The Online Censorship Push and Suppression of Digital Media

[etchMember]

Hi all.
If you were in the chatbox the other day, you may have read this post that I initially submitted to reddit.

Outsourcing of our signals intelligence chips to China basically compromised our digital security until present day. Allowing them to fuck around saying “Russian hackers” this and “Radical [foreign] Content” that. Thanks to our very own Mr. redhand, for his talk with Tony Gosling, for clarifying this information:

This conveniently aligns with Apples introduction of the smartphone, as we know it. This brought hundreds of millions more people online and into the freedom trap. Around that time also, wikileaks was being brought into the public eye, passed to the hands of the people. Most notably and publicly, Kim Dotcom and his friend Aaron Schwartz.

This video is absolute essential viewing to understand how dirty and evil the censorship squad are.

With the emergence of youtube, people getting online and exposure to all this content. Kim Dotcom’s services like Megaupload posing massive threats to the establishments corrupt record industries and paedo-wood. Reddit grew and grew, particularly in the states.

It was getting well beyond any of the deep state or shadow governments control. So they did what they do best and compromised these things.

Eventually, they got Aaron Schwartz, on something of a technicality in 2011. After a lot of intruding and following him, taunting him and ruining his life. See linked documentary ^

Personally, I think this is where they got more access to Reddit. This was a play, to gain more control over the web and reddits ever-expanding massive influence. Maybe he gave them information about the algorithms or source code. Maybe they just intruded. Who will ever know. Schwartz wouldn’t have let Reddit become what it is now, imo. Obama’s AMA was the test run – almost immediately. They flooded the place with vote-manipulating and shill accounts right then. Western bots and troll accounts. Acting for the democrats, deep state, shadow gov or whoever else we don’t want representing us. Simply blaming the fact that “People wanted to talk to president!”

I don’t buy it at all. It was literally proven during the Cambridge Analytica and SCL scandal that this shit went on and even that Obama/DNC was indeed datamining. We also have Soros-backed groups doing the exact same thing, now in our /r/unitedkingdom subreddit. They made sure that comment got to the top and locked the thread. Praise the dead hero, who was probably killed because he thought about speaking out. </tinfoil hat>

Around the same time, they PsyOp’d the fuck out of Assange and confined him in that building. He was a distraction tactic, a tax sink. They just completely defamed the guy from every angle to make everyone hate the idea of whistleblowing.

So all this conveniently coincides with the attack on online piracy. MegaBox was a huge threat to the record industry. It threatened to pay artists 90% of their sales. Plus megaupload was a cloud service unlike anything they could even attempt to create at that point in time. See: Kim Dotcom: Caught In The Web (trailer below)

Also somewhat essential viewing; you can find this on amazon prime. Or mega… 😉

So they seized and stole it all. They stole Kim’s data. In an illegal FBI raid, using military force. They used it for themselves. Plus they used it to dredge the internet for any content which contained those signatures and removed it.

Now, this leads us right up to where we are today. Secular society, political correctness, identity politics.. etc. It’s all part of their plan. Turn the internet into a degenarate cess-pool and then police it. As our own reporters have said, how do they police cyber bullying? Not the advice I was always told of “turn off your device and go outside”. No. Don’t turn to good people in the community or distance yourself from this psychological trauma. Stay the fuck on your phone and shut up. Report them and make it somebody elses problem. Literally the policing tacitc they use. Just turn it into another brainwashing tool. But… I don’t think people, the workers, the hackers… Will let this happen.
Never forget:

The Worldwide Web is a public domain resource. It is no establishments job to police this.

Thanks for reading. Any questions I’m happy to answer.

http://www.savethelink.org | RIP, Never forget: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpvcc9C8SbM | https://saveyourinternet.eu/

3 users thanked author for this post.

Martin Edwards, purple hoax, jennywren55

[jennywren55Member]

Thank you etch I found that very interesting just as an aside it looks like Assange is or was part of the cult the family they all dressed alike and had blonde hair ,the amount of information on the web is a small fraction of what is on the dark web the gin is loose on the world how do we put it back in the bottle , the vast libraries of the world and the secret knowledge hidden in libraries all over the world including the Bodleian ,as you cannot research further back than 1547 ,are under lock and key so for the rest of us we have to dig deeper their greatest fear at the moment is that we share ours when they do not KOR F

[etchMember]

Thanks jenny, I’m pleased it was of some help to make this all a bit clearer.

Indeed. It could be true. I’ve never met the guy to ask him. Which is why I also wonder if maybe his involvement is what compromised these two great individuals’ work.
But there is a 300+ strong team working solely to defame the guy as well. Do understand the story from this side; our side, the public.

It’s a bit fucked but as far as politics go.. I think he now prefers his new friends. The ones fighting for his freedom and who helped shape wikileaks into something for the public (and not just another government tool). I can’t comment on CIA links and indirect OpenSociety funding or any of that. By no means was wikileaks ever just Julian.

It’s just important to remember that those two individuals were attacked because of their involvement in wikileaks. It wasn’t about piracy or copyright or any of that charade. It was always entirely about censorship. Those guys were pushing the boundaries of what wikileaks was set up for.

Also, as you mention the history books.. Well.. You might want to take a look at this other thread!

http://www.savethelink.org | RIP, Never forget: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpvcc9C8SbM | https://saveyourinternet.eu/

1 user thanked author for this post.

purple hoax

[etchMember]

Just want to talk about the DNC hack. Where the world was fully introduced to the idea of “Russian Hacking”.
Of course, we all know that “Russian hackers” do not exist – in this light. Even if they did exist, the hack is not physically possible to have came from Russia. So it was never Russia.

First of all. Remember that only about 12 machines were even connected and accessible via the internet. I remember the monumental screwup when this came out after their hacking cover story and they scrambled to hide it.

So after they covered that up, they said some bullshit about “Oh, but every voting machine comes with remote access software, that have potential to be connected to the internet in some way”. Which is bolllocks. Even if it’s not bollocks…
IT’S THEIR FAULT FOR NOT READING THE DOCUMENTATION AND REALISING THEY CAME PREINSTALLED WITH OEM REMOTE ACCESS SOFTWARE – A MASSIVE SECURITY RISK FOR ANY VOTING MACHINE.
They should have disabled this software, or just not bought *the most over-priced* machines, with none of this bells and whistles nonsense pre-installed.

As this whole thing unraveled, everything they tried to say was almost instantly shot down as lies. Even when they tried to pin it on Gucciffer as the Russian hacker.. He himself released his own statement saying he has no such ties or interests and yet, people still trust the establishment over the individual. As usual.

Here’s the scoop and reason this theory checks out:

DNC files were copied at a speed of 22.6MB/s, a speed virtually impossible to achieve from halfway across the world. Especially in Russia, whose average download speed is about 7.4MB/s, from the US whose average speed was about 18MB/s.

22.6MB/s is about USB transfer speed and roughly half the speed of a local SSD transfer. It’s very extremely fast; a connection would need to be at least 25MB/s on both ends to maintain that level of speed reliably.

The only way Russia could have hacked the DNC at that speed is either:

• physically being inside the building (easiest and most believable option – which we are not told is what happened).

– OR –

• They tunnelled under the DNC, replaced all the internet wiring and built their own data exchange point – building the same equally high tech infrastructure in their “Russian bunker”. They then built and launched two super high technology satellites (better than anything Japan had – leading technological empire of the world) to transfer this data back to Russia at those insanely high speeds.

This second option is just not feasible but that is essentially what people are believing. If you know anything about how computers and the internet work, it doesn’t add up. At all. It’s absolutely laughable tbh because that’s the only way PHYSICS and SCIENCE would actually allow it to be Russian Hackers. Tell me. Have YOU ever had a download finish at USB transfer speed?
The answer is most likely no, unless you’ve been to Japan. Particularly back in 2016.

So anyway… The theory goes that the insider was Seth Rich.
This checks out in numerous ways. After all, he was murdered before he could give any statement or interviews, or any further evidence that he did it.
Someone investigating his murder was killed. Someone else investigating was supposed to be killed but he survived.

Most interestingly though… Anytime I try to confront a brainwashed establishment minion about this.. They start saying the Seth Rich thing was a “Far-Right conspiracy”. Implying the usual hateful connotations of race-hating alt-righter.
This is not at all true. This theory was proposed initially by hacking and programming genius… Wikileaks insider, none other than Kim Dotcom himself. If you trust anyone about the source of this hack, trust him.

In absolutely no way at all is Kim Dotcom associated with the Far-Right or any radical poilitcal ideologies. He’s just some neutral German guy, living in Australia now. Who the Deep State hates. That’s why you will NEVER EVER hear his name tied to this in mainstream media. Kim is the one with the real evidence and real proof here. They are breaking the law on multiple counts by ignoring him and trying to entrap him. So far they have yet to release ANY proof of ANY Russian hack. ANYTHING AT ALL. Server logs, IP logs, Server caches files, anything. There are all kinds of things they could show, which would clearly and explicitly point to Russia – if it was Russia. Instead, they didn’t have a public investigation. It was done entirely in private, the report never to see the light of day. They can’t show you the evidence or server logs. They can’t show you any of this because if they do, it will quite clearly say that it was a local USB file transfer.

Furthermore.. Any talk of Russian Hackers interfering in brexit is UTTER SHIT. We KNOW for a FACT those campaigns were run by SCL. Probably by our own governments. They probably conveniently used Russian operatives – knowing their dirty tactics. Also Brexit was paper ballots. Our elections are paper ballots. Russian hacking in this country is literally an absurdly ridiculous horribly offensive myth.

http://www.savethelink.org | RIP, Never forget: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpvcc9C8SbM | https://saveyourinternet.eu/

Attachments:

You must be logged in to view attached files.

1 user thanked author for this post.

purple hoax

[purple hoaxMember]

@etch

As much as I’ve come to dislike the term, you are ‘Awesome’. ^^^

Cheers !

"A source reported ..." is Greek for "Fake News"

1 user thanked author for this post.

etch

[Author]

Posts