This is Part 3 of a three-part series between UK Column and Prof Gloria Moss. In Part 1, Prof Diane Rasmussen McAdie spoke with her about the higher education crisis that has recently unfolded in the UK and across the West. In Part 2, Gloria and Ben Rubin spoke about biological, psychological and visuospatial differences between the sexes as evidenced by Gloria's extensive research into the topic.
Part 3 took a dark but necessary turn: the exploration of the evil, transhumanist agenda that has existed within human societies for centuries, which appears to be accelerating in the current age due to the availability of technologies that can enable humans to become part machine. Following is an edited version of the notes that Gloria provided to UK Column, which are essential to share along with the discussion due to the alarming, perhaps unbelievable, points explored.
The Origins of Transhumanism
Transhumanism starts from the presumption that man is not perfect. We chart here the broad chronology of this idea, starting with two ancient sources. The Bible’s Book of Revelations 13:18 states that Man has the Mark of the Beast: 666. In modern-day terms, the carbon atom that Man is made from (Man being a carbon-based lifeform) is made up of six protons, six electrons, and six neutrons: 666.
According to The Gnostics’ The Secret Gospel of John, from the 2nd century AD, the Light Source created 10 Aeons who created ‘Kindness’ which created the 1st perfect human. The Light Source then created the ‘4 Illuminates’, who created the 12 Eternal Dimensions. One of the 12 Dimensions, Sofia, became unbalanced, and was expelled into a dark dimension, becoming paranoid, egotistical, and aggressive. The Demiurge force in Sofia then made a lower energy dark creation, the material universe, and also created a hierarchy of controlling forces, or rulers, Archons. The Demiurge and the Archons attempted to create a slave worker version of the human created by the Light Source. These slave workers could be benevolent or psychopathic.
The higher dimensional force retaliated by imbuing these slave workers with thinking and spiritual power and the Archons, their rulers, then used diverse means to control and suppress them: (a) false religious beliefs, (b) eradication of higher knowledge in all subjects, (c) mindless entertainment, and (d) genetic manipulation.
Gnostic thinking regarding the composition of the human population said that less than 1% of humans are born with a fixed connection to the light multiverse. They have an innate sense of right and wrong and are creative ‘Lightworkers‘. At the other end, less than 1% are born or receive a fixed counterfeit spirit. They suffer from paranoia, total service to self, and are psychopathic and non-creative. These are vibrationally opposite poles. According to Martin Colborne, those in the middle are what we might call ‘empty vessels’. They have no innate spiritual orientation of right and wrong and remain materially orientated. Unlike the Lightworkers or counterfeit spirits, the empty vessels are not fixed in intuitive belief and can absorb the light or dark of the groups around them. Currently, the empty vessels are more heavily influenced by the Counterfeit Spirits than by the Light mutiverse.
By way of a footnote to this, it is worth noting that research shows males to be more invested in depicting machines than females, and more vested in having distant relationships with people than females. So may this lead them to be more easily co-opted by the Counterfeit Spirits in developing the Transhuman? Here is the evidence for these two statements about males and females.
Love Affair with Machines
From Gloria’s earlier research on gender, sex, and drawings/paintings (see her book Gender, Design and Marketing), we learn that boys are vastly more interested in depicting machines than females. Three landmark studies show this:
- Ballard, 1912: drawings of 20,000 London children aged 6-10: > 20% of boys’ drawings were of ships, and 9% of girls’.
- McCarty, 1924: looked at 31,000 drawings of children ages 4-8. 100% of boys depicted vehicles and tools, as opposed to 22% of girls.
- Hargreaves, 1977: highly significant difference in the extent to which boys and girls drew mechanical objects.
Distal Relationships with People
In the literature on leadership, men are widely documented as having a preference for a transactional style of leadership over transformational leadership. This preference is manifested in the style that they like to use over others, and the style that they prefer to have exercised over themselves. Transactional leadership views leadership as a series of transactions with little contact with followers, hence the competence of ‘management by exception’, or only intervening when things go wrong.
Skipping Several Centuries
Transhumanism represents the Masonic aim of assisting humanity in evolving to merge with a ‘cosmic consciousness’. A similar idea emerged from the Fabians. Are they continuing the work of the Archons?
When Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein in 1918, she was in Switzerland with Lord Byron, whose father was a Freemason. Was her novel a critique of the merger of the human and the artificial?
H. G. Wells (1866-1946) was a Fabian and the author of 1940’s The New World Order, a non-fiction work which outlines plans for a socialist one world government. It includes a human rights declaration which served as the basis for the United Nations’ ‘Universal Declaration of Human Rights’. Wells may have been one of the first people thinking about genetic modification and transhumanism for his 1896 book The Island of Dr. Moreau, which concerns a mad scientist creating human-animal hybrids.
Aldous Huxley’s 1932 dystopian novel Brave New World is a must-read for anyone attempting to understand the transhumanist agenda. Did he and fellow Fabian Society member George Orwell merely fictionalise the globalist transhumanist plans of their fellow Fabians? Aldous Huxley studied at Eton College and Oxford University. He met Bertrand Russell at Oxford, and entered the Fabian Society through him. Aldous Huxley tutored George Orwell at Eton, and Orwell’s novel 1984 was published in 1949.
Let’s briefly consider thinking on gender, before focusing more exclusively on transhumanism, a term coined in 1950 by Julian Huxley, the brother of Aldous Huxley, in his book New Bottles for New Wine.
Gender
Simone de Beauvoir’s book The Second Sex (1949) stated: “One is not born but becomes a woman”. Simone de Beauvoir and Jean-Paul Sartre were advocates of the Front de libération des Pédophiles (FLIP).
Dr John Money’s theories about ‘gender’ led to transgender ideology. He stated that biology does not matter in relation to gender and that people are born ‘gender-neutral’. He was a public supporter of paedophilia and incest and a deviant child abuser. References to Dr Money can be found in Richard House’s review of Dr Miriam Grossman’s book Lost in Trans Nation: A Child Psychiatrist’s Guide Out of the Madness.
From questioning the validity of biological sex, and the formulation of Transgender Ideology and Practice (TGIP), it is a small stretch to then move to Transhumanism, as we can see from the writings of Martine (formerly Martin) Rothblatt in 1996’s The Apartheid of Sex: A Manifesto on the Freedom of Gender: “The genitals don’t determine your sex … You can choose … whichever gender you want … There is a gender fluidity that crosses the entire continuum from male to female … Separate male and female genders is a constructed fiction”. Martine then went on in 2011 to write From Transgender to Transhuman: A Manifesto on the Freedom of Form, where we find these thoughts linking transgender with transhumanist ideals: “in transcending biology, technology offers an explosion of sexual identities ... [and] human identities ... [leading to] transhumanism ... [and] hybrid human-computer species”.
TGIP is estimated to be worth $1.9 billion by 2032. Figures at London’s Tavistock Gender Identity Disorder Service for gender-affirming care show that in 2009–10, there were 77 patients, but by 2021–2022, the number had exploded by 4,555% to 3,585. In 2013, the DSM-5 estimated the rate of adult ‘gender dysphoria’ (the term that replaced ‘Gender Identity Disorder’, or GID) to be between just 0.002 and 0.014%, or 14 people per 1000.
Beyond transgenderism, we are seeing reports of children being allowed to identify as animals in the UK, citing 'species dysphoria' as the reason.
Let us focus now on transhumanistic thinking, which is an obviously unfortunate progression from transgender thinking.
Transhumanism
In 1962, Aldous Huxley gave a talk at Berkeley entitled ‘The Ultimate Revolution — A Blueprint to Enslave the Masses’. According to Huxley, all revolutions have aimed at changing the environment to change the individual. By modifying the surroundings, you affect the human being. He said that we can contemplate the ultimate, final revolution, where Man can act directly on the mind-body of fellow Man in a non-violent way. This was important in his view, since if you are going to control populations for any length of time, you need some measure of consent so that people “love their servitude”.
He referred to Orwell’s 1984, showing a future society where control is exercised by violent control over mind and body. Huxley stated that scientific dictatorships of the future will be closer to the pattern of Brave New World because it is “more efficient”. You are likely to have a much more lasting and controlled society than in the Orwell-type society. In Huxley's view, dictators will become more interested in the type of techniques employed in Brave New World, and this will be the ultimate revolution, one that he refers to as “scientific dictatorship”. Huxley spoke of techniques for inducing consent and people loving their servitude, including Pavlovian conditioning as well as hypnosis.
Huxley also discussed how human populations can be categorised according to their suggestibility. The non-suggestible preserve us from dictatorship. Any demagogue who can organise the 20% of suggestible people can overturn their government.
The next landmark was the 2005 establishment of the Machine Intelligence Research Institute (MIRI), formerly the Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence, of which Ray Kurzweil was a director. He was head of engineering at Google and the modern prophet of transhumanism, believing that we are partly organic tissue and partly mechanical parts, a merger of biology and technology. MIRI’s advisory board also includes the Swedish philosopher and leader of the transhumanist movement, Dr Nick Bostrom, now at Oxford University who has written about personality pills and superintelligent machines. He co-founded the World Transhumanist Association, now called Humanity+. Another man associated with MIRI is Peter Thiel, co-founder of PayPal and Palantir Technologies, and a man with many government contracts. In June 2025, he was asked in an interview on AI and transgenderism whether he thought the human race should survive during a public discussion on artificial intelligence and transhumanism, and after a long pause he eventually replied, “Yes... but —”.
Ten years later, in 2015, we find Yuval Noah Harari’s book Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow describes how humans have survived starvation, plagues, and wars, and how the next stage beckons.
His argument? He takes the view that having reduced starvation, disease and violence, and as a consequence, having reduced mortality, we will now aim to overcome old age and even death itself. Having saved people from abject misery, we will now aim to make them positively happy. And having raised humanity above the beastly level of survival struggles, we will now aim to upgrade humans into gods, and turn Homo sapiens into Homo deus., ie divinity … will be necessary to change our biochemistry and re-engineer our bodies and minds … the second great project of the twenty-first century — to ensure global happiness — will involve re-engineering Homo sapiens so that it can enjoy everlasting pleasure.
He describes death as a “technical problem” and states that, in seeking bliss and immortality, humans are in fact trying to upgrade themselves into gods. Not just because these are divine qualities, but because in order to overcome old age and misery, humans will first have to acquire godlike control of their own biological substratum. The upgrading of humans into gods may follow any of three paths: biological engineering, cyborg engineering, and the engineering of non-organic beings. Using the Cyborg route, he said, “Cyborg engineering will go a step further, merging the organic body with nonorganic devices such as bionic hands, artificial eyes, or millions of nano-robots that will navigate our bloodstream, diagnose problems and repair damage”. With the engineering of non-organic beings, neural networks will be replaced by intelligent software which could surf both the virtual and non-virtual worlds, free from the limitations of organic chemistry.
In making these statements, he is making a number of assumptions, all of which are problematic:
- Famines and plagues were all natural in origin, and not the result of actions by malevolent forces.
- Homo sapiens is part of an evolutionary process.
- Health can be ensured by transforming mainstream medicine. He completely overlooks the pernicious effect of disallowing certain treatment protocols and failing to reform mainstream medicine.
Elon Musk established Neuralink in 2016. Years ago, he said that Neurolink could predict what your brain is thinking and could write on your brain. It uses brain computer-interface technology (BCI).
Just a year later in 2017 came Klaus Schwab’s book The Fourth Industrial Revolution that speaks of the fusion between biological and technological systems to create a whole new world.
Following on swiftly, in 2018 we find Petra Desutter’s TED talk ‘Telebabies’ that describes Aldous Huxley as a "visionary" on the basis that he foresaw that technological reproduction could replace "old-fashioned reproduction". Desutter said that although Brave New World was written in 1932, this future is happening now. She referred to Professor of Bioethics Julian Sanulescu, as a “very smart guy”; one who describes genetic manipulation/enhancement of babies as “the moral duty”. She stated that it will be possible to create a child using DNA from three or four people with “old-fashioned fertilisation” running counter to the new science of homosexual genetic fertilisation, something facilitated by stem cell technology and paving the way for “rainbow families”. She discusses “gene editing” and “taking over our own evolution”, both transhumanist strategies, stating that if AI wants to take over, humans will need to enhance their genes. By way of illustration, we are told how the miostatin gene could be altered to allow people to manipulate muscle mass. She mentions in an uncritical way the film Gattaca in which designer babies are created to order but counsels that pregnancy outside the uterus is not possible yet.
Next, we find the publication of books demeaning motherhood by The Wellcome Trust, the UK’s largest provider of non-governmental funding for scientific research in Britain. It has £16 billion of funding to spend by 2032 “to advance scientific discovery and take on the world’s most urgent health issues”. Books it has published that demonise conventional birth and motherhood include 2021’s After the Storm: Postnatal Depression and the Utter Weirdness of New Motherhood by Emma Unsworth, which refers to the “alienation, desperation and exhaustion” experienced after birth. Eve: The Disobedient Future of Birth, by Claire Horn (2023) that refers to the “tyranny of biology”, asserting that the “real tyranny is our inability to relinquish archaic ideas of sex and gender”, the view that there are only two sexes is “so entrenched”, and “the idea that artificial wombs could be used to redress gendered inequity in reproductive labour is compelling”.
Coinciding with these books, at a 2022 meeting of the World Economic Forum, Nokia CEO Pekka Lundmark publicly declared that by 2030, the most common interface of smartphone technology will be "built directly" into the physical body and that, by then, cellphones will be virtually obsolete.
Approaching the present day, we heard University of Toronto Professor Emeritus Sir Geoffrey Hinton, a British-Canadian computer scientist, cognitive scientist, and cognitive psychologist known as "the Godfather of AI" for his work on artificial neural networks collected the Nobel Prize for Physics in 2024. Between 2013-2023, he had worked at the Google Brain project, and in 2023, Hinton resigned from Google, citing concerns about the potential for advanced AI systems to develop goals that are not aligned with human values. He has estimated a 10% to 20% risk that AI could contribute to human extinction within the next 30 years. In his acceptance speech for the Nobel Physics Prize, he spoke of the need for forceful attention from governments and international organizations towards “research on how to prevent these new beings from wanting to take control”.
For Further Reading
Resources that were not discussed in the interview due to time constraints follow.
According to ‘Epstein’s Secret Investments in AI Human Bio-Engineering for Profitable Population Control', Epstein was not only involved in trafficking. He was funding AI-related research between 1998 and 2002, with Harvard receiving $200,000 from him. This was to support the research of Stephen Kosslyn, an expert in the field of psychology and AI, integrating the two with the understanding that both use ‘imagery’ powerfully. A report from Harvard University shows that Kosslyn had known Epstein for about nine years and supported his application as a visiting fellow in the department of psychology in September 2005. Epstein had no academic credentials.
The article ‘6G Rollout: The User as Programmable Substrate’ explores the link between 6G and transhumanism. It quotes James Martinez, media ecologist and the last living original MKULTRA whistleblower, who served on the Board of Advisors for the Freedom of Thought Foundation in 1994:
With the advent of 6G, thoughts will be trackable, emotional states measurable, and decisions will be predictable and influenced algorithmically. This is not science fiction—culturally this is being framed as a disability aid or commercial convenience, but in media ecology, the interface is ideology. Once we ‘think’ through a machine, our consciousness is redefined by its architecture and thereby ends our divine individual self. Permanently...
J. B. S. Haldane published a book with H. G. Wells and Julian Huxley called Reshaping Man's Heritage in 1944; it contains transhumanist elements. Haldane, a Communist, also published Daedalus; or, Science and the Future, in 1924. A 2023 talk at Ideas Matter’s ‘The Academy’ Conference featured a talk entitled ‘The First Transhumanist: Haldane's Daedalus 100 Years on’ by Sandy Starr, which explained the heavy transhumanist element in that work.
Donald Ewen Cameron, the psychiatrist who oversaw the MKULTRA mind control experiments, had his Allan Memorial Institute research centre bankrolled by the Rockefellers, as did Alfred Kinsey of sex research fame.
Yuval Noah Harari described his vision of an “emotionless being” in Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind and Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow.
