As of 9 March 2025, Mark Carney has officially been installed as interim Prime Minister of Canada, having replaced a beleaguered Justin Trudeau, whose usefulness to the ruling oligarchy is all used up.
Throughout his ten-year tenure as Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau demonstrated a consistent incompetence and detachment from the people of Canada whom he has assailed and insulted on numerous occasions, but is Mark Carney an improvement, or something much more dangerous?
To answer this, it will be useful to briefly review the role of Mark Carney, and then review his life’s mission and the broader commitments of those masters whom he serves.
A Brief Sketch of Mark Carney
When Mark Carney stepped down from the position of Governor of the Bank of Canada (which he ran from 2008-2013) to become the second foreign-born Governor of the Bank of England since that private central bank was created in 1694, it was made clearly known that this Oxford-trained Canadian technocrat had been vetted by some very high-level powers.
After training for years as a Goldman Sachs investment banker during the 1990s (at a time which his bank played a driving role in controlling the sale of Russian bonds that helped destroy that state), and after his bank helped fuel the growth of those bubbles that nearly brought down the world economy in 2008, Carney was brought into the Governorship of the Bank of Canada to take on the role as the 'clean, conservative-minded Canadian central banker navigating through the chaos’ which his former employer helped create.
It was at this time that Carney became a member of the Rockefeller Foundation’s Group of 30, a Foundation Board member of the World Economic Forum, the Sovereign Order of the Knights of Malta, and a leading participant at Bilderberg and Davos events.
While still the Bank of Canada’s Governor, Carney was handed the keys to the BIS’s Financial Stability Board (FSB) by fellow Goldman Sachs man Mario Draghi in 2011, where he managed global derivates regulation (aka: fuse of the international weapon of mass financial destruction now bursting at the seams). For those who don’t know, derivatives are not the legitimate creative financial instruments which Greenspan had proclaimed them to be in 1987, but are, in fact, the time bomb that has been built into our banking system over 35 years which has grown to become a hyperinflationary cancer valued at over 20 times the world GDP.
On 26 February 2020, Carney joined Sir David Attenborough in launching the COP26 Green Private Finance Agenda:
‘The objective of the COP26 Private Finance Agenda is for every professional financial decision to take climate change into account. The right framework for reporting, risk management and returns will embed these considerations and help finance a whole economy transition. To achieve net zero, every company, bank, insurer and investor will need to adjust their business models for a low carbon world’.
The Green Bankers Climate Compact which Carney pioneered would ensure that companies that are considered ‘dirty’ would never receive loans from banks, and any insurance they received would come at impossibly high premiums as punishment for their climate-offending ways. As a shining role model for ‘good green behaviour’, Carney has cited that his former employer Goldman Sachs has already ruled out any future financing for oil drilling, thermal coal projects, or Arctic development.
In his paper “EU Taxonomy Is Binary - We Need 50 Shades of Green”, Carney stated that all dirty (brown) companies with poor climate grades will either not receive loans or receive loans at such high levels of interest that they will be artificially bankrupted (taxing polluters to death).
As Carney said in September 2019, ‘Firms that anticipate these developments will be rewarded handsomely. Those that don’t will cease to exist’ [emphasis added].
On 10 August 2020, Mark Carney returned to Canada to take control of a post-Covid programme uniting its pandemic and climate responses under a new centralised command structure called the Canadian Pandemic Recovery Plan. It set the stage for those Green New Deal reforms laid out during the World Economic Forum’s COVID-19: The Great Reset Summit on 14 July 2020. It is useful to recall that none other than now-King Charles III, a leading patron of the World Economic Forum, was the figure selected to usher in The Great Reset onto the world with his June 2020 tweet about #TheGreatReset.
On his official website, then-Prince Charles launched the project, saying, ‘Today, through HRH’s Sustainable Markets Initiative and the World Economic Forum, The Prince of Wales launched a new global initiative, The Great Reset’.
Under the influence of Mark Carney and King Charles, the Bank of England, and some of the dirtiest banks in the Rothschild-City of London web of finance have promoted 'green financial instruments', led by Green Bonds, to redirect pension plans and mutual funds towards green projects that no one in their right minds would ever invest in willfully [emphasis added]. Carney also worked closely with Lynne Forrester de Rothschild, King Charles III, and Pope Francis to integrate The Council for Inclusive Capitalism with The Vatican in December 2020.
Just when it seemed that Carney’s star could not rise higher, the Canadian technocrat was appointed President of the Royal Institute for International Affairs (aka: Chatham House). For those still unaware, Chatham House is the controlling hand of the Council on Foreign Relations which Hillary Clinton coined 'The Mothership’ in 2011. This mothership and global array of think tanks was created by the Rhodes Trust and took over the functions of the Rhodes-Milner Roundtable movement established with the explicit aim of restoring the British Empire as the throne of a one world government and recapturing the lost colonies of the United States.
In his 1877 will, even Cecil Rhodes called for modelling a new Church of the British Empire around ‘the Jesuit constitution’, and the Fabian Society directly modelled its techniques on this method of permeation theory to gain influence over all levers of culture, taste, and politics.
As I documented in Origins of the Deep State in North America Part 1 and Part 2, it was this Roundtable Movement that directed the growth of a new breed of technocrat both in Canada and the USA which also pioneered the conversion of the formerly industrial capitalist systems into an anti-growth, green orientation.
The Ecological, Social, Governance Index (ESGI) which Carney has promoted, has now been set up across 51% of Germany’s banks, including the derivatives bomb waiting to blow named Deutschebank. Leading bankers supporting the ESGI, like Mark Carney of the Bank of England, have said that over 6.5 trillion Euros could be mobilized under this new index (which currently accounts for about $160 billion).
The creation of these green bonds ran hand-in-hand with the bail-in mechanisms which have now been implemented across the transatlantic nations in order to steal trillions of dollars from pension funds, RRSPs, and mutual funds the next time a bail-out is needed to prop up the too-big-to-fails, which currently sit atop a $1.2 trillion derivatives bubble waiting to blow.
Could a Benevolent Green Dictatorship Be a Good Thing?
The devil’s advocate speaks:
We presume that these central banks, oligarchs and hedge fund managers just care about the environment?
So what if they are trying to modify humanity’s behaviour to save the environment?
After all, humanity itself is a selfish, gluttonous pollution-making machine, and is it not better for everyone if those enlightened elites just transform the world economy so that we consume less, and think more about the future?
If this line of thinking approximates something you have felt inside yourself, then you’ve been brainwashed.
Of course, the world has turned into a consumerist cult over the past few decades, which has sacrificed long-term thinking for short-term gain, and of course we need a reorganisation of the system. Greta Thunberg and the Green New Dealers are not wrong about that stuff. That is all fine and dandy.
But if you think that going along with the types of reform that aspires to put dollar values on reducing carbon footprints or spreading low quality (and very expensive) windmills and solar panels across the globe with the expectation that somehow these sources of energy will not cause a vast collapse of industrial capacity of civilisation (and an associated loss of capacity to sustain human life), then you are fooling yourself.
One kilowatt of windmill energy is only the same as one kilowatt of nuclear power when applied to a mathematical equation, but not in real life. When applied to capital-intensive work functions needed to melt industrial steel, run machine tools, power a vast agro-industrial complex, high-speed rail system or implement things like Belt and Road Initiatives, green energy sources do not come even close to cutting the iron.
The issue has always been population control.
The oligarchs running the grand green reset of the world have always had population control in mind. This was explicit when The Club of Rome’s Sir Alexander King announced the publication of the 1972 study dubbed The Limits to Growth written by two computer scientists, Jay Forrester and Dennis Meadows, at MIT. By 1973, the Limits to Growth programme, which foresaw total population crises by the year 2000 unless drastic action was immediately taken, was adopted by the newly-formed World Economic Forum.
Sir Alexander admitted that his Club of Rome was never truly about solving pollution issues, but rather population control, which he admitted in a 1990 foreword to the Club of Rome’s blueprint for the 20th century, when he wrote:
'In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill… All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself'.
The same Dennis Meadows who oversaw Alexander King’s Limits to Growth study recently delivered his belief that the world’s elite should only tolerate a population of 1 to 2 billion souls, under a benevolent dictatorship, of course.
Sir Alexander was, after all, just following the lead of UNESCO Founder and British Eugenics Society President Sir Julian Huxley, who wrote in 1946:
‘Political unification in some sort of world government will be required… Even though… any radical eugenic policy will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care, and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake so that much that now is unthinkable may at least become thinkable’.
It was only a few years later that Huxley would co-found the World Wildlife Fund alongside Prince Philip Mountbatten and Prince Bernhardt of the Netherlands. All three were present at Bernhardt’s founding meeting of the Bilderberg Group to advance this grand conversion of society into a wilful self-extermination in 1954, and while Huxley was not present in 1970, the other two oligarchs co-founded a financial endowment called The 1001: A Nature Trust, alongside 999 other wealthy misanthropes, to fund the blossoming environmental movement.
It was while serving as President of the British World Wildlife Fund that the late Prince Philip Mountbatten stated in a 1981 interview with People magazine:
‘Human population growth is probably the single most serious long-term threat to survival. We’re in for a major disaster if it isn’t curbed—not just for the natural world, but for the human world. The more people there are, the more resources they’ll consume, the more pollution they’ll create, the more fighting they’ll do. We have no option. If it isn’t controlled voluntarily, it will be controlled involuntarily’.
Prior to chairing the Rio Summit in 1992 that inaugurated the term Sustainable Development and Agenda 21, Maurice Strong (a 1001 Nature Trust founder, Bilderberger, and VP of the World Wildlife Fund under Prince Philip) mused over the controlled disintegration of society when he said:
‘What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about’?
The oligarchs that are currently trying to reform humanity today do not care about the environment. Prince Philip and Bernhard have been recorded to have killed more endangered species on safari than most people have killed mosquitos. They just don’t like people. Especially thinking people—thinking people who question how and why arbitrary rules are applied to justify wars, poverty and oligarchism which destroys lives both now and in the future.
If those new standards shaping economic value advanced by the late Maurice Strong, Prince Bernhardt, or Mark Carney are permitted to become the foundation of North American law under a Green New Deal, then any type of industrial or scientific activity which increases agro-industrial production (and the increased power of sustaining life) will be made all but illegal.
This means that every company working along China’s Belt and Road Initiative in Eurasia, the Middle East, and Africa would not exist in Carney’s world while any western company which could actually participate positively in the multipolar dynamic would be cut off all credit and die. From this vantage point, review the fate of companies like SNC Lavalin, which provided key assistance to Gaddafi in constructing the Great Manmade Water Project destroyed by NATO in 2011.
After companies have proven their greenness, simply being approved for bank loans will not be enough to carry out their business. Here Carney and his colleagues at Canada’s Infrastructure Investment Bank plan to issue green bonds which today amount to only 5% of all global bond issuances but which Carney hopes will soon attain the ‘$3.5 trillion in energy sector investments [needed] every year for decades’ which are required to ‘keep warming below 1.5 degrees’.
It is only by rejecting this depopulation ethos that Canadians, Americans, and humanity at large stands a chance of recovering our once-great traditions by embracing long-term thinking, problem solving, war avoidance, and embracing abundance for future generations instead of a dystopic future of scarcity, war, and eco-tyranny.
