‘Public health’ has consistently been utilised by those in power to impose what would otherwise be an unwelcome level of control on the populace. The threat to one’s health appears to elicit a fear so great that all manner of madnesses will be endured in hope of warding off dreaded diseases, whether those diseases are real, or indeed imagined by the demons in charge who seek to enslave us all. We have only to go back five years for evidence of this. In a bid to evade a supposed disease called Covid, people followed one-way systems around supermarkets, covered their faces with rags, and stuck testing sticks up their nostrils. Ultimately, they allowed themselves to be injected with an unknown and untested substance, the effects of which are now, five years on, becoming horrifically all too clear. Covid is just one of many such fear fests we have been subjected to. Prior to Covid, there were warnings of impending doom from SARS and Ebola, to name a few, and subsequently the dangled threat of Mpox (formerly called ‘monkeypox’), though none have packed quite the punch of Covid.
Those of us who were sceptical about Covid, and whose judgement therefore was not clouded by fear, saw simply enormous governmental overreach happening before our eyes, and watched in horror as the compliant masses handed their freedom over willingly, without considering if, or when, they might get it back. The entire official Covid response appeared orchestrated, as though Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s bumbling was a scripted act. It felt like a soap opera, played out via 24-hour news channels, morning talk shows, radio phone-ins, and, of course, the five o’clock daily briefings, which left the public on a new cliffhanger each day. It was a time of great confusion and fear for many, and when the first lockdown in the UK was announced on 23 March 2020, Boris & co. justified this totalitarian action with the predictions of doom that had resulted from computer modelling carried out at Imperial College London by Prof Neil Ferguson.
Two decades earlier, in 2001, the farming industry had been hit with a major crisis, when a Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD) outbreak was declared spanning several counties in the UK. First confirmed at an abattoir in Essex in February that year, by September, more than 10 million animals had been slaughtered countrywide, and the industry had been brought to its knees. The tourism and hospitality industries in those same regions were equally devastated, when walking routes and footpaths were closed to the public, and towns and villages were put into quarantine, all supposedly to curb the spread of the disease. Incredibly, it was the same Prof Neil Ferguson who provided computer modelling which predicted mass disaster from the FMD outbreak, unless his recommendations of mass slaughter were implemented.
In any case, it is safe to say that in the handling of Covid and FMD by those who put themselves in charge of matters was less than satisfactory. In fact, it was downright appalling. But was the damaging mismanagement of these two alleged public health emergencies, two decades apart, by accident or design? The many similarities between the way the two situations were handled, not least the question of input from Prof Neil Ferguson, cannot be ignored, and are worth exploring in more detail, as they may provide some answers to this pertinent and urgent question.
Computer Modelling As Justification
The contiguous cull policy implemented for FMD on the back of Ferguson’s computer modelling led to the slaughter of entire herds and flocks on 9,515 farms, despite only 2,030 farms confirmed to have infected animals. It was a hugely contentious policy, according to which all animals within a 3 km radius of an infected farm were slaughtered. That it was informed by modelling in a computer lab, as opposed to by listening to farmers and experts in the field, was perhaps one of the most telling aspects of the entire tragedy. That this same computer modelling done by Ferguson was, according to some experts, “severely flawed” makes the outcomes all the more painful for those so devastatingly affected. The response to FMD has been heavily criticised by farmers and agricultural experts in the decades since, with many questioning the true potential motives.
Horrifyingly, the FMD crisis came only a few years on from a previous farming crisis from which the industry was only just recovering. In the late 1980s, the public were told that there was a bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) outbreak in the UK, and that it represented a significant risk to humans who may consume contaminated beef. Subsequently, when several young people fell ill and died with what appeared to be Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease (sCJD), a rare brain disease usually affecting those over 60, a link was made by scientists between the disease and contaminated cow meat, and a new variant was named, vCJD, colloquially known as Mad Cow Disease. Beyond the age difference, the symptoms of sCJD and vCJD appear indistinguishable. 177 deaths have been attributed to vCJD, supposedly contracted by the victims after consuming meat from an animal with BSE. Over 4 million animals were slaughtered, despite only around 180,000 animals being confirmed as infected, which obviously impacted the farming industry hugely, and caused significant financial hardship to many farmers. What was the justification? Almost unbelievably, it was Prof Neil Ferguson’s modelling which predicted 136,000 deaths from vCJD.
There were even further so-called crises in which Ferguson’s predictions were sought, and in which he was involved in catastrophising with his elaborate modelling and huge overestimations, including a prediction of up to 200 million deaths from a Bird Flu epidemic and 65,000 from a Swine Flu one. None of these were borne out in reality. So why were governments across the world so keen to implement such severe action in 2020 based upon this same professor’s Covid modelling? One could be forgiven for wondering if he was commissioned specifically to produce reports that would ensure certain predictions in order to justify the unpalatable measures and policies the powers that he wished to implement. Boris Johnson and his crooked band wasted little time in jumping upon the justification of Ferguson’s computer modelling, and imposing their tyranny, when they locked down the nation, closed all businesses and schools, and put citizens under a form of house arrest. Two decades earlier, Tony Blair also cited Ferguson’s work when he was equally quick to implement the now infamous ‘slaughter on suspicion’ contiguous cull policy. Many farmers, as well as two prominent lawyers, maintain that the contiguous cull was illegal, and that it did not fit with existing advice and protocols established after a 1967 outbreak.
Flouting of Rules
When the public learned of parties that had taken place at 10 Downing Street during the Covid lockdowns of 2020 and 2021, there was collective outrage. Many felt foolish that they had complied with the rules so rigidly, while the very people imposing the restrictions had not. It occurred to many that this surely meant that those in charge knew there was nothing to fear. Partygate, as it was dubbed, mirrored a similar incident during the FMD outbreak. At the height of the crisis in 2001, distraught farmers could do nothing but watch, heartbroken, as their beloved animals were callously and unnecessarily slaughtered. Those who relied on the hospitality and tourism in the affected areas for their living watched as well, equally devastated. Yet, while these ordinary people suffered, large groups of gentries were exempted from the closures, and were granted access to closed land, as grouse shooting was permitted on the Yorkshire Moors. Despite the footpaths and moors being closed to the public, wreaking havoc on the local economy, different rules, it seems, applied to the wealthy, and they were permitted continued rights to enjoy their deadly pursuit. Farmers were understandably angry, as were members of the public, who had been doing all they could to follow rules.
Large Scale Projects Were Implemented and Paid for, Then Abandoned
In 2020, seven hastily constructed ‘Nightingale’ hospitals were opened up and down the country at an enormous £530 million cost to the public to handle the alleged tidal wave of Covid patients we were told were expected. However, it soon became apparent to sceptics, who already knew that existing hospitals were exceptionally quiet and had been effectively closed to anything except Covid, that these new hospitals were nothing more than ‘good optics’ for a lead-swinging UK Government (and its handlers). Indeed, the hospitals were closed after little more than a year, having treated a paltry number of patients, estimated to be as low as 54 people in the London site. It was a huge, and costly, waste of money.
Similarly, the FMD crisis had its very own ‘Nightingale’ situation, in the name of a project at Ash Moor, near Petrockstowe in Devon. Ministers chose this site to dig an enormous burial pit for carcasses of slaughtered animals at a cost in excess of £7 million. The Government purchased the land from a French company by whom it was owned, and dug 18 burial pits, each the size of a football pitch. However, the pits were never used. Instead, the dreadful practice of burning the dead animals on huge pyres was deployed, causing horrendous emotional distress to farmers, their families, and local people alike, and which only added to the burdens so tragically suffered.
Ignoring Experts
In 2001, when the FMD crisis was raging, Prof Ian Mercer CBE confirmed in the Crisis and Opportunity: Devon Foot and Mouth Inquiry 2001 Final Report that the State Veterinary Service (SVS), the UK Government body then responsible for animal health and welfare, was called upon to manage the outbreak. However, the veterinarians from SVS were not locals to the areas in which they were being deployed, which spanned the length and breadth of the country, and were therefore unfamiliar with the local herds and flocks, and the differing practices of movement of animals in particular areas. Local vets, who clearly possessed more understanding of local practices, farmers and animals, were not called upon for their expertise—not even in an assistive capacity—to the SVS. Mercer further confirmed that some local retired vets even volunteered their services, but were turned down, despite many having experience of managing previous, albeit smaller, FMD outbreaks. And it was widely reported that then-Prime Minister Tony Blair banned anyone who raised these questions, or indeed disagreed with any aspect of his handling of the enquiry from cabinet meetings and briefings.
Fast-forward to 2020, and Johnson & co. displayed this very same hubris by ignoring experts, such as the 47,839 medical practitioners and the 16,176 medical and public health scientists, from all around the world, who signed the Great Barrington Declaration, opposing the tyrannical lockdown measures employed by so many countries. The Declaration was not just ignored, but worse, was actively dismissed as conspiracy and misinformation. Social media companies and mainstream media assisted governments by censoring opponents of the Covid measures, and many eminent people who opposed lockdowns, masks, and vaccines were smeared and had their reputations trashed, to prevent them from speaking out.
Manipulation and Control of the Narrative
Another curious similarity between the two crises is the way that the supposed contagious and deadly viruses appeared to bend to the will of those in charge. Our friend Neil Ferguson pops up again here, for his 2001 modelling for FMD, by a massive stroke of coincidence, predicted that the epidemic would come to a screaming halt on 7 June 2001, the exact date that local elections, which Tony Blair was adamant must happen, were due to take place. Again, it is almost as if, perhaps, Prof Ferguson was told what the required result of his modelling must be, and so programmed his computer accordingly.
Covid, it seems, was equally controllable by ministers, as we learned from some leaked WhatsApp messages between then Health Secretary, Matt Hancock, and his adviser. After revealing that he wished to “frighten the pants off everyone with the new strain” of Covid, Hancock’s adviser enthusiastically responded that this was indeed the way to achieve “proper behaviour change”. “When do we deploy the new variant?” is what our dishonest Health Secretary wanted to know. Of course, sceptics had long known that this was the game they had been playing, confirmed when, after dangling the possibility of a family Christmas to the nation at the end of almost a year of on-and-off lockdowns, Boris Johnson pulled the plug just a few days before the big day, citing a “new strain” of the virus. Who knew Covid was also the Grinch?
Lying by Numbers
Lying about numbers is second nature to power-hungry elites and politicians alike, and at times of crisis, this becomes one of their most vital skills. It should be seen as no coincidence that Bill Gates endorses the book How to Lie With Statistics by Darrell Huff. From the very start of the so-called Covid crisis, the public were bombarded with statistics on numbers of deaths, numbers of ‘cases’, and numbers of hospitalisations. The aim was clearly to overstate the numbers, to scare us all into submission by manufacturing the lie that Covid was a hugely contagious and lethal disease, and that unless we stuck to the rules, we were all doomed. Scandalous practices were introduced to boost the numbers, including recording any death within 28 days of a positive Covid test as a Covid death. Even someone hit by a bus could be marked as a Covid death under this ridiculous and misleading data collection method.
Lying about numbers came into play in 2001, too, although downplaying was the aim back then. Official Government figures put the number of slaughtered animals at 4 million. Those better placed to tell the truth, i.e. the farmers and others in the industry, knew this to be a huge understatement. The figure, they assert, was closer to 11 million. As usual, smoke and mirrors were used to massage the statistics. Deplorable tactics were used, such as not counting newly birthed calves, but instead only recording the slaughter of their mothers.
Looking at the similarities of these two crises, both allegedly arising from unknown sources and posing a threat to public health and spaced almost two decades apart, it becomes apparent that the devastation caused by governmental response and intervention was not wrought by hapless politicians caught like deer in the headlights, as many still believe. The idea that all the mismanagement and immense harms caused were the result of knee-jerk reactions by panicked ministers is hard to believe. Instead, a picture of deliberate, orchestrated destruction emerges. The same playbook, being used time and again, from FMD to Covid, and every ‘crisis’ in between. Convince the public that they are in imminent danger, from viruses or environmental catastrophe, and you gain control of the population and the ability to manipulate people’s behaviour.
Once one recognises this pattern of problem/reaction/solution, one sees it everywhere, and events from history, viewed through this lens of understanding, take on new significance. What becomes clear is that with many of the so-called crises that have taken place, there is a significant similarity and overlap, which calls into question the randomness and isolated nature of each one. An interconnectivity exists, and evidence emerges of all roads leading to an agenda: one world government and population control—in short, a New World Order. In order to facilitate this New World Order, the three-letter organisations, puppet masters to all Western governments, have crafted Agenda 2030.
A global climate crisis has been a long-running prophecy of public health doom, and the one, it could be argued, that will ultimately be used to complete the takeover of the world. Teenagers in the 1980s were indoctrinated to believe that should they use too much hairspray, a gaping hole in the ozone layer would cause all of humanity to burn itself into extinction by the year 2000. The brainwashing has been so successful that the fact of humanity’s continued existence has done little to dull the zeal of the alarmists, who remain convinced that the human race is facing certain imminent catastrophe. Unless we pay more tax to the Government, of course. The alleged threat to our climate has provoked elderly grandmothers and spoilt young brats alike to glue themselves to roads in apparent protest and to throw soup over famous paintings in a bid to awaken us all to the world’s supposed plight. There is ample evidence that a climate catastrophe is most certainly not imminent, and that humanity has little to do with the changing climate. David Belamy was an early victim of cancel culture for saying just that. And yet, governments across the Western world are pushing the climate alarmist narrative hard, and the gullible are buying it.
Agenda 2030 is a call to action, demanding much of the citizens of the world yet little from the elites, all in the name of ‘sustainable development’. It hangs like a spectre over us, our everyday lives blighted by constant propaganda about the urgency of its aims. Corporations are, of course, completely captured, their advertisements peppered with buzz words like ‘sustainability’, ‘clean energy’, and ‘growth’. From car manufacturers to clothing brands and tech beasts to beauty giants, every sector of industry is now awash with on-message virtue signalling, inviting the public to believe that corporate profits are less important to these conglomerates than the planet. It’s utter nonsense, of course, but in this corporatised world, truth is apparently of little value. These huge corporations wield enormous influence over a consumer-obsessed public, and therefore they are important tools in the brainwashing process.
We are locked, it seems, in a battle for control, with each so-called crisis another puzzle piece in the globalists’ push towards total technocracy. Covid served a purpose to prime us for lockdowns, for fewer forms of interaction with other humans, for medical interventions, and for something like a universal basic income, with furlough payments conditioning people to the idea of being paid for not working, as well as a culling of the elderly, of course. FMD was a way to exert ultimate control over farming, and therefore the food supply. It gave a reason for the implementation of tighter controls over the farming industry in order that we are reliant on those merciful (read merciless) ‘powers that be’ for our very existence. Ultimately, we are now seeing this in earnest, with the changes to inheritance tax rules for farmers, meaning it will be impossible for many farmers to pass on their farms to their children, despite them having been in the same families for generations. The land will inevitably be bought by conglomerates, and food production will slip further away from us, the people, and into the hands of the corporate giants. As far back as 2001, subsidies were available to farmers in various forms for not farming land. This continues apace to this day, with Sustainable (there’s that word again) Farming Incentives (SFI). Additionally, many farmers have been persuaded to sell or rent their land for unsightly solar farms, another virtue-signalling but useless enterprise, albeit one that fulfils the Agenda 2030 requirements.
In any battle for control, the obvious crucial commodity is food. It is the ultimate necessity for survival, next to water. Perhaps water will be the next in line for full technocratic control. Right now, while waxing lyrical to the public about maintaining food security and supply chains, governments in countries across the West appear in fact to be systematically destroying this essential life source. Farmers represent two obstacles to a One World Government. One, they are often independent businesses, and two, they ensure food security. The New World Order requires us all to be tied into the corporate machine, feeding the coffers of the elite, with the rest of us at their mercy.
The pitfalls of trying to wake people up to the Machiavellian tactics of governments (working on behalf of the real power, obviously) are many. Elitist puppet masters are playing the long game. It is perhaps why many fail to connect the dots. The Covid and FMD crises occurred two decades apart, yet both were part of the push towards Agenda 2030. After Covid, the slogan we heard everywhere across the world was ‘Build Back Better’. We were told this meant a ‘reset’ (another word to be wary of), where systems would be rebuilt for the better. They know best, you see. I found it interesting that an inquiry into FMD in Devon back in 2001, the document mentioned above, was entitled “Crisis and Opportunity”. It was another curious mirroring and a rebadging of tragedy for the entire farming industry into an opportunity for rebuilding.
Bill Gates, whose grubby mitts are all over so many of the crises we are subjected to, is now the largest farmland owner in the United States, a fact that should shock us all. I think we can safely say that his many visits to the UK are not simply for the great golfing. Be alarmed. But for the right reasons. We must fight back against this take over of our lives, and at all costs, fight for humanity.
