• This topic has 3 replies, 4 voices, and was last updated 1 month ago by Gone. This post has been viewed 155 times
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #182545
    Paul Christopher Stone
    UK Column Annual Membership

    SPIN ARTICLE
    This article from Dinosaur Media SKY News is trying to create a dangerous narrative.
    What do you think?

    At Mark Fletcher’s office there was so much tension, that we were offered a cup of tea on two or three of the visits and the
    picture taken was also taken by someone from his office. Hats off to them, he has got good staff and they have been spot on.

    Two of my pictures are used in this spin piece and I can’t remember them asking for permission. The second is the Mark Fletcher one.

    Regards,
    Paul Christopher Stone
    ‘Kris’

    https://news.sky.com/story/how-do-i-find-where-he-lives-how-online-groups-plot-confrontations-with-mps-over-covid-rules-12440222

    Attachments:
    #182578
    Lord charles
    UK Column Monthly Membership

    the best bit is the ever present proclamation “Why you can trust sky News ”
    Nothing could be further from the truth, and yes of course this very article is proof that you could never trust sky , the Agenda in this article is barely hidden , Just another enabling piece of Journalistic propaganda to introduce the next theft of peoples right to privacy – the obvious target by the Government is Telegram, because there are too many people waking up and being woken up by articles of irrefutable truths on Telegram.

    2 users thanked author for this post.
    #182581
    JC
    UK Column Annual Membership

    the obvious target by the Government is Telegram, because there are too many people waking up and being woken up by articles of irrefutable truths on Telegram.

    Nice to think we’re creating extra work for those lovely people in SAGE and the Nuts, sorry, Nudge Unit.😂😂

    1 user thanked author for this post.
    #182582
    Gone
    UK Column Annual Membership

    Of course the subtly implied or blatant spin that’ll be coating any story of MPs being confronted by anyone with highly pertinent questions citing equally pertinent referential information is really obvious.
    All MPs = at risk and in need of protection.
    Confronters = tinfoil hatted conspiracy theorists, radicalised extremists, potential killer terrorists or variations of all of these.

    1 user thanked author for this post.
Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

©2021 UK Column

Log in with your credentials

Forgot your details?