3 Comments to “A View Worth Hearing”

1. John Morton | May 27th, 2008 at 1:53 pm
   

   Some useful insights here, but I do not agree with his views on the foundation of America.

   Yes, many of the founders were Masons, but that does not imply some satanic conspiracy. In fact the US was unquestionably founded as a rebellion against the European oligarchy and it’s bestialised idea of mankind as just another animal on the plantation.

   This point of view was further reinforced in recent weeks by no less than Prince Philip, the depopulator in chief of that evil institution, the Club of Rome.

   A Republic dedicated to the general welfare of it’s citizens and their posterity is what the founding fathers gave America, and the world.

   It is our job to ensure that this idea does not fail, but instead is spread to all corners of the world, ensuring the defeat of the Imperial system that has taken over our planet and is now aiming to destroy the sovereign nation state system completely.

2. david_grothier | August 3rd, 2008 at 6:12 pm
   

   The following as lengthy as it is. Affect each of us as there is not a family in the UK beyond the reach of these terrble issues. I am always available for further details on any of the below Daviddegrothier1@yahoo.com

   ‘All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing’ – Edmund Burke

   Admirable words, but surely there are plenty of them floating around and have been for several millennia, and covering a variety of topics.

   But obviously there are many more of these sayings, and the majority of them devoted to the failings of the human race. Philosophising upon man’s inhumanity to man, his cruelty, and deviousness. must of course be as almost old as man himself. I guess even the

   Neanderthals must have had a grunt or two on the subject, and if any of the newer generations, who are usually so disinterested in these matters ever doubt it, I have just finished a re-watching of my Schindler’s List video, ( I do this for time to time to keep my perspective focused), I suggest that they do the same as it a foreboding example of what man is really capable of given certain circumstances.

   As I look at the despair in the UK today, ( and its undeniable that there are so many depressed faces), I sadly realise that there must be many millions of good men doing absolutely nothing in order to stoutly avast the evil forces that make our daily lives a meaningless drudgery.

   I have no doubt what so ever that our nation is in the grip of the both hands of an evil to equal that of Nazi Germany.

   There are so many injustices taking place in what is supposed to be, at least of the face of it, a free and democratic nation. And what makes the whole situation even more desperate is that you never really know exactly who is who, and what their agendas, (many hidden) may really be. Certainly such agendas are not there to improve British society nor stop its increasing breakneck decline further into the abyss of abject misery under the influence of the vacuity of our hubristic government

   However, I find that you cannot support your views too loudly or indeed too enthusiastically in Britain today as you will surely be branded a trouble maker, nuisance or even a terrorist under the increasing draconian British laws, which are nothing more than the ·”illegal” instruments of government to continually curtail and erode your rights. Or, as it has already happened in Britain, if the authorities want to play even dirtier, you could even find yourself sectioned under the Mental Heath Act: (a more cost effective, efficient and discrete alterative method of detaining you at queenie’s pleasure).

   Maybe most people are aware of these penalties, and perhaps that’s why the good remain in preferred silence of what they see and hear: they tend to see no evil, hear, no evil and not speak about any evil, until they themselves may become its victim, by which time they are trapped. Or it could be that we the people of this nation have simply come to accept that evil corruption and scandal is the norm in our way of life. Certainly in my “aware” years, staring with Profumo, I can’t recall a corruption related scandal free year since then. Although both Christine and Mandy, (from just down the other valley), were tough acts to follow and from those days things seem to get even more crass. And the public have just accepted that out politicians, police and civil servants are just bent and simply got on with life,

   So getting the message out to the nation may prove to be a two fold problem, apart from the renowned general apathy of the citizensheeeeeeeeeep, for reasons above–-“ Its just another scandal chaps––whose round is it next?” etc, there could be an actual and genuine fear of reprisal from the state for voicing an opinion in objection once the nation is made fully aware. . But such collective voicings are rare, sadly, very rare indeed

   There have been many really upsetting and concerning incidents in Britain where I felt that awareness should have alerted the general public and I thought that it was very odd indeed that people had not taken to the streets in protest!

   The biggy for me, as those who know me will attest to, was the Bristol Babies Scandal. I really felt that if there was ever just cause for riots then there would never have been no better claim to captivate the international media’s attention than an outraged British public on the warpath for justice for our babies who were systematically butchered, for years, ( I prefer an accurate description of what really happen, I will leave the niceties to those who revel in the use of such prose), until a few doctors become so sickened and outraged over the barbaric needless continuance of pathetic surgery practices, that they blew the whistle.

   Had they not, then it was clear from Prof Kennedy’s Enquire, that the merciless killings would have continued.

   We today most fortunate in that we have probably the greatest gift to inter-personnel communications, the internet. For the time being at least, we can easily communicate our concerns with other like minded people.

   It was through the internet that I was fortunate enough to encounter Brian Garrish, and John Harries. Brian helped me to see what I had questioned for a long time and could not quite put together and John made me rethink many things. ( A partial result of which is reproduced below and there will be more to come).

   On Pages 6 and 7 of The UK COLUMN there are two respective stories, the parties are both well known to me, and consequently I know of their personal grief and suffering over many, many long hard years.

   I would respectfully ask of you all to re-read these two UK COLUMN Features and try to get behind the stories, and get a grip on the bureaucratic machinery behind the Bye and Lewis cases and assess the number of people involved in denying these ordinary people, just like you and me, the justice they so obviously deserve.
   Joan and Derrick Bye have fought long and hard for justice for their beloved daughter. They have fought for 30 years, yes people 30 long hard years and have still been denied justice –Do you think this is right?

   Do you think this cant happen to you? Well trust me people it will if the right or rather wrong circumstances arise and its happening now to parent throughout the UK.

   Take the case of William Powell ( well worth contacting for those truly concerned (willcpowell@talktalk.net), who lost his son Robbie. Will has exposed, and did so with hard facts the extent of just how evil and corrupt Britain is .

   I trust that one day William will get his story fully published as it will shock you all into violently puking when you think that this Sovereign Nation, with a constitutional monarch, and a woman at that, can allow such atrocities to continually happen to parents still deep in grief. Its absolutely barbaric what the administration of this country is capable of, and does to protect, its negligent doctors over the rights off the parents

   And please consider if they can do these monstrous things in these cases, then they are capable of anything in the interest of self protection–-even the killing of David Kelly!.

   Such deceptive machinery is massive, and to the ordinary person almost unbelievable that its there at all, but its there alright, infested with evil and purposely designed to deny your basic rights.

   Please let give you all a further example I made the follow complaint to South Wales Police Force. I don’t expect them to act on as it could easily open the flood gates for many other in the same situation. However when I made my complaint, with prudence, I tool the precaution of copying it to a number of others, including legal academics and international constitutional observers and what I now regard as the Joke (justice) Ministry, thereby ensuring that a record was created.

   My complaint, although specific to my circumstances, actually goes further than the individual and concerns matters that are happening to the ordinary British citizen here in Britain today. I am far from unique in simply wanting justice, there are man many parents our there who have endure very much the same as me.

   Anyhow here is my complain as made to South Wales Police, please note the number of wanton abuses of constitutional rights with a whole load of malice aforethought. You decide if those concerned should be brought to justice.

   Derrick and Joan Bye, Will and Diane Powell, my family and the many other bereaved parents–-we all know that nothing can ever bring back our beloved children’s. We have all discussed this many, many times. However we also agree to continue with what we all clearly see as a fight, and it’s a real fight as the enemy is real and ruthless and know that they are protect and unaccountable, because that’s what the evilness of the current system allows them to be. So we fight for you children and you rights, our loved ones are mercilessly lost to us–don’t let it happen to yours–-in the name of GOD please don’t!

   Formal Complaint.
   Emailed Saturday, July 26, 2008 9:38 AM

   Supt Mark Lynch. Cc Supt Ken Isaac.
   For the attention of the Chief Constable South Wales Police Force:
   Subject––––––––––––Formal Complaint Conspiracy to

   Perverting the Course of Justice and Perjury.

   Dear Mark

   I trust you continue to be well.

   I would be grateful if you would kindly asses, acknowledge, and then pass on the following further complaints your Chief Constable.

   You will recall that when we met some five years, or so, ago I made it clear that I was not on a witch hunt against the doctors involved in the untimely death of my child. I told you and your colleague, whose name alludes me, that I simply wanted to ensure the proper level of accountability to bereaved parents, and to the pubic in general, trusting to try to help ensure better heath care standards which would avoid similar tragedies that my family, and many others have suffered.

   Furthermore, I went on to specifically state that it would have been much better situation all round if the then Chief Executive Officer (CEO), of Swansea NHS Trust (SNHST), David M Williams, had been honest and forthright from the outset in complying with my request for complete unrestricted veracity in the matter of over beloved Stephie’s death. Had veracity been forthcoming ––– we could have laid our child to rest there and then and saved so much of the ensuing heartache and pain.

   Instead, David M Williams, chose a mendacious path, deliberately in order to cover the truth over, and did so at great expense to the public purse and damage to my family. (this I contend is fraud, and an abuse of public office and trust).

   The results of this you are aware of motivated me into legal action. However even though I won my civil action, David M Williams walked away scot free ( as most public officials do in any event), as he knew all along that his dishonest actions would never be called to account.( This has to be wrong in any democratic society especially when we are all accountable to the Rule of Law)

   However, I believe that David M Williams, just as the doctors involved, together with the coroner J R Morgan, were all guilty of a Conspiracy to Pervert the course of Justice.

   I have, as both you, and Ken are fully aware, been very patient with your investigations and assurances to date. However as the time has dragged on, now five and a half years, it was obviously apparent that I was not going to get anywhere with my original complaints, made in cause of justice for my child. Today it is sad but unfortunately true that abuses of justice are now obviously too deeply entrenched in British society that many of the public have lost and are losing confidence in the administration, hence the pathetic state of this once great and proud nation!

   Issues such as mine will never come to light and to rightfully justice unless exposed for what they really are,( a deliberate attempted to cover up negligent deaths aided by certain state organisations and public bodies) and formally complained about in such a manner as to ensure the need for a full and proper investigation which is concluding with a full report from the investigating body. This report should be placed in the public domain and clearly state why proceedings were, or were not, commenced against those who are the subject of such complaint..

   On that basis my complaints are produce below, and in absence of your long awaited report. I wish to formally make fresh allegations of a Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice and Perjury.

   Understandably, and I trust you will appreciate, the need to ensure that my complaints, which are in the best public interest, are further generally publicised at the time of the submission of them to South Wales Police, as it is essential to create further awareness of these formal complaints, which will serve, I trust to improve the level of public service delivered on all fronts.

   There is absolutely nothing personal, of any form, in my decision to ensure a wider audience to my formal complains, it is simply that the nature of these complaints are far above any of the personalities involved therein. I am only concerned with ensuring better patient protection and better lucidity for bereaved parents.

   The allegations of perjury of course, as your are aware, was committed during the Inquest into the death of my child, conducted by Mr R J Morgan the then Swansea coroner, by the doctors involved in her alleged treatment, at Singleton Hospital, Swansea

   The allegation of Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice, involves R J MORGAN, the former coroner, and David M Williams, the latter I allege initially conspired with two so called independent specialist paediatric witnesses from the outset, in order to ensure a favourable report from them which would deny the negligence of the SNHST doctors, which was subsequently admitted to as a result of my civil action. The supposedly independent paediatric witnesses were secured at expense to the public purse, by Welsh Health Legal Services, a publicly funded organisation set up specifically to afford doctors legal protection where negligence is alleged. ( I would suggest that South Wales Police investigate these two hastily prepared reports, as I contend that no credible experienced paediatricians would have repapered such reports had they known in advance that there would ultimately have been an admission of negligence. These two reports I further content were an integral part of the process of Conspirering to Pervert the Course of Justice) I am fully aware that a medical opinion is just that. an opinion but it strike me as strange that the two opinions gained by Williams via the Welsh Health Legal Services favoured the SNHST, who in turn later ignored such opinions and “voluntarily submitted to a judgement of negligence–-I find that there something is very wrong here, very wrong indeed, Supt Lynch.

   David M Williams, as CEO of SNHST would also have had full knowledge of what evidence his doctors would be giving at the Inquest into death of my child, and was therefore a further, I claim an integral element in the conspiracy to commit perjury during the inquest.. Also it has now been clearly revealed, that in order for all the doctors involved in my original perjury allegation as report to South Wales Police Force, there was obviously, and had to be, a premeditated conspiracy in order for them all to align consistency and fluency in their versions of events in order to conform with that of each others’ versions.

   This is an issue which I feel that may have been inappropriately overlooked during the initial investigation carried out by South Wales Police force.

   In relation to the coroner, Mr J. R. Morgan, (whom I feel through his position has been purposely “left off the hook”), and Public Justice Offences Charging Standards, are not the following factors relevant as they are to all public justice offences when assessing the relative seriousness of the conduct?.

   Do not the police have to consider whether the conduct:-

   1. was spontaneous and unplanned or deliberate and elaborately planned;

   2. was momentary and irresolute or prolonged and determined;

   3. was motivated by misplaced loyalty to a relative/friend or was part of a concerted effort to avoid, pervert, or defeat justice;

   4. was intended to result in trivial or serious harm to the administration of justice;

   5. actually resulted in trivial or serious harm to the administration of justice ( as the acceptance of perjured evidence most certainly was)..

   I believe that Mr Morgan was a central part of the Conspiracy to Pervert the course of Justice. For that reason, it is so obvious now why he made no effort to query the evidence given by the doctors during the inquest, which clearly under the Coroners Act 1988, he was required to do, and indeed had a definite clearly defined duty to do so, and therefore should have done so. Yet even when conflicting evidence was given during the closing stages of the inquest by Dr Scanikop, Morgan still made no attempt to be inquisitorial in order to properly determine the cause of death, which he was of course, as stated above, there to do, and required to do so under his duties required by the Coroners Act 1988.

   And even though the evidence of the doctors involved, especially that of Drs Kontos and Matthes conflicted with the facts of the day in question, and was rightly pointed out to Morgan, as perjury during the afternoon sitting of the Inquest, Morgan chose to take no action.

   The question that’s needs to be asked and answered fully is one of WHY? A coroner’s duties are specifically prescribed in the Coroners Act 1988 in as much as, Section 11(2) The coroner shall, at the first sitting of the inquest, examine on oath concerning the death all persons who tender evidence as to the facts of the death and all persons having knowledge of those facts whom he considers it expedient to examine.

   The coroner made no attempt to examine the evidence tended, he simply accepted what was said as it was said. Furthermore a Coroner’s Inquest is a public forum, yet the right to electronically record or manually note the proceedings was strictly forbidden! I believe this to be a further illegal action on the part of a coroner in a public inquest where the press would be free to attend.

   When the civil case was won and Morgan was informed of the now “unquestionable perjury”, he still chose to take no action. Instead he clearly stated that he was not, “MINDED TO DO SO.”

   Therefore, by his own metaphoric hand Morgan has exposed himself to a just recourse under criminal law, for he had abused the fundamentals of the British Constitution, and as the eminent jurist, Sir Edward Coke stated a crime against the Constitution–– IS THE CRIME OF TREASON!

   Article 45. Of the Magna Carta 1215 states––––

   We will not make men justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs unless they are such as know the law of the realm, and are minded to observe it rightly.
   Morgan was clearly aware of perjury, and his duties under the Coroners Act 1988, yet it was he, and he alone, that by his own choice and words, was not “MINDED” to observe the “law rightly”– as he was clearly required to do!.

   No man is above the Rule of Law which we in this country live under. Yet Morgan thought and acted as if he was!

   To allow Mr Morgan to contravene the internationally respected Magna Carta, (without just recourse to full accountability), which is one of the founding constitutional principles of many of the world’s great a free democracies, would be a grave travesty of justice and would undoubtedly bring Britain into further and deeper disrupt.

   Mr Morgan, when sitting as corner at the inquest into the death of my child was made fully aware that my child had recently had open heart surgery at Bristol Hospital for Sick Children (an Atrial septal defect, ASD) and was further aware of the lack of proper treatment and care during the whole course of the day of May 21st 1997 at Singleton Hospital Swansea. (I actually witnessed the lack of concern by the Ward Staff).

   All of whom I have mentioned the fact that my child, under these circumstances, received no life saving treatment during almost 14 hours of being in what was designated a special paediatric Unit ward at Singleton Hospital Swansea, they have responded with shock, disgust, disbelief and have generally been appalled that this could happen in a British NHS hospital. Yet Mr Morgan thought nothing of pursuing this matter under evidence, as I contend any reasonably competent coroner would have been expect to do. Mr Morgan was more concerned in protecting the doctors involved than pursuing enquiries as to the actual cause of death as he was required by law to do!

   This really is the most unacceptable of conduct and simply cannot and must not be allowed to stand unchallenged, as to do so would make a complete mockery of what credibility British Justice has left.
   Mr Morgan is undoubtedly in my opinion clearly accountable under the penalties contained within the Coroners Act 1998, Sec(5) A coroner who is guilty of corruption, wilful neglect of his duty or misbehaviour in the discharge of his duty shall be guilty of an offence and liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years or to a fine or to both.
   T
   urning to Archbold for guidance on public justice offences I find that–– In cases of any seriousness, a prosecution will usually take place unless there are public interest factors tending against prosecution which clearly outweigh those tending in favour.

   Although there may be public interest factors against prosecution in a particular case, prosecutions for public justice offences should usually go ahead and those factors should be put to the court for consideration when sentence is being passed.

   The perjury in this instance is not a matter that needs to be further debated as clearly, for all involved to vehemently deny negligence at the inquest, and to do so under oath, then at a later stage as a direct result of my civil action, and with “none” of the material facts altered, to move to voluntarily admit to their negligent death of my child––- then clearly the evidence given under oath, was perjuriously given in the hope of getting away with the negligent death!

   This is a grave wrong indeed, and one that must be righted, for if left to stand the long term repercussions of this abuse of Justice will terminally undermine the Laws of Perjury, notwithstanding the indecent insult to any credence left within an already jaded British Justice system!

   The perjury tendered at the inquest was well rehearsed in order for the individual evidence to have continuity with the other individual evidence given. To rehearse evidence which is subsequently, and I remind you, voluntarily admitted to be perjuriously given, ( it would not be possible to deny negligence under oath and to later admit to the negligence under question without such evidence given under oath not to be deemed perjury, would you not agree?), leads to a malicious aforethought for the purpose of a Conspiracy to Pervert the Course Justice.

   Perverting the course of justice covers a wide range of conduct. Perverting the course of justice is a serious interference with the administration of justice. I have outlined factors in the Charging Principle above, which helps to identify the seriousness of the conduct of the witnesses under oath, David M Williams, and indeed to Coroner Mr R J Morgan himself, all of whom I alleged were an integral part of the Conspiracy to Pervert the Course of Justice, both during the Inquest, and in the case of Mr R J Morgan, subsequently when made formally aware if the of the civil admission of negligence.

   To me, it has become perfectly clear as to why Mr Morgan was, “Not Minded” to look again at the conduct of his inquest, as to do so would have obviously incriminated himself!

   The offence of Perverting the course of justice is committed when an accused:-does an act or series of acts, which has or have a tendency to pervert; and which is or are intended to pervert; the course of public justice. Clear these elements were actively present during Mr Morgan’s inquest.

   I will, until advised to the contrary, assume that the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) was requested to advise the South Wales Police on my original complaint of perjury committed by the doctors involved in the death of my child. The CPS were also involved in the decision not to bring charges arising from my allegations of Manslaughter through Gross Negligence.

   You have already made me aware there is a decision not to bring prosecutions for my initial allegation of perjury committed at the Inquest into my child’s death. However, I contend that not to do so for such serious offices, or indeed any offence, would be in direct violation of Art 45 of the MAGNA CARTA which requires that–––––––––––.

   We will not make men justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs unless they are such as know the law of the realm, and are minded to observe it rightly.

   Therefore to observe the law “rightly” as stated in our time honoured and internationally respected Magna Carta, would imply that those who break the law are brought to justice, and that the bringing of law breakers to justice is not indeed an arbitrary requirement but a definite one fixed by statute in the Magna Carta. Furthermore, it is not a reasonable assumption that those who are “not minded” to observe, ensure, protect and enforce the laws of the land, have no standing in the said law, to be a part of the justice system?

   In finding such person of poor standing within our legal system indicates to me the wider implication that the process of appointing such persons is inherently flawed and not constructed in the best interest of the citizens of this nation nor its justice.( {this is a separate matter, one for alternative deliberation and not here}, and one for gravest of concerns as it become a question of a neglectfulness mismanagement of the legal infrastructure of the administration of UK justice involving the appointment of morally unqualified personal).

   It had been painfully obvious to me for some considerable time that certain law administrative agencies such as the CPS, are clearly guilty of the unconstitutional practice of a selective application of the law. Constitutionally this practice is illegal, as was, in my opinion, the CPS’s decision not to bring a prosecution arising from my complaint of Manslaughter through Gross Negligence of my child, as my allegations had most of the elements required for a prosecution under the tests stipulated by Lord Justice Mackay in R v Adomako [1994] 3 All ER 79; [1995] 1 AC 171, and were further supported by influential Commonwealth legal enquiry tribunal findings as delivered by Mr. Justice René P. Foisy, Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench, on a failure to observe the stipulated procedures which resulted in death through gross negligence on Canadian National Railways, 1986/7.

   It was through a failure to follow specified procedures laid down in the Specialist Paediatric Ward of Singleton Hospital Swansea by the head of the Unit Jean Mattes, that ultimately led to the death of my child!

   I have been forbidden by the CPS to have these failures brought into open court and examined by an judge sitting with a jury of my peers–-WHY? The CPS have acted as both judge and jury in this matter and that is WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! As this is an abuse of my Constitutional and Human Right––-why then has this been allowed to happen to me, as the representative of my dearly loved deceased child, under the English/Welsh legal system and the Constitution of this country?

   This is obviously a blatant abuse of my Constitutional and Human Rights solely as I remain firmly committed to my original statement that no child should ever be allowed to be admitted into a British NHS Hospital under any circumstances, and be allowed to linger for almost 14 hours, not receiving life saving treatment, only then to die through a lack of proper professional care! This is an abominable situation, which it is made even more distasteful and horrible when one considers that a 10p telephone call to Bristol Hospital for Sick Children could have saved our beloved little girl, who had so mush zest for life..

   Article 40 of the Magna Carta 1215 states––- To none will we sell, to none deny or delay, right or justice.
   This implies that my allegation of Manslaughter through Gross Negligence should have been heard in a court of law, with a jury of my peers sitting, and I should not have been faced with the arbitrary unconstitutional, unchallengeable decision ( ie made with no right of appeal) not to appear before said judge and jury which was made by non judicial persons/organisation such as the CPS

   English/Welsh common law recognises the right to a jury trial to be a fundamental civil right

   Also trial by jury became a pretty explicit right in one of the most influential clauses of the Magna Carta which reads in its original form
   Nullus liber homo capiatur, vel imprisonetur, aut desseisetur de libero tenemento, vel libertatibus, vel liberis consuetudinibus suis, sut utlagetur, aut exuletur, aut aliquo modo destruatur, nec super eum ibimus, nec super eum mittemus, nisi per legale judicium parium suorum, vel per legem terrae.

   It is translated as follows–-No free man shall be captured, and or imprisoned, or disseised of his freehold, and or of his liberties, or of his free customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or in any way destroyed, nor will we proceed against him by force or proceed against him by arms, but by the lawful judgment of his peers, and or by the law of the land.”

   On behalf of our dearly love deceased child, I claim that right, the right that her unwarranted and subsequently admitted negligent death be brought before a judge, sitting with my peers as a jury of 12 just and free persons of this land to decide upon my allegation that her tragic death was a case of Manslaughter through gross Negligence.
   To be denied this would be to deprive both my deceased child, my family and me of our enshrined constitutional rights!

   Finally, I would bring to the attention of South Wales Police Force and make it clearly understood : I don’t not make these complaints lightly and without the most deepest and serious of aforethought. However, I have found that in discussion with many other bereaved parents in similar circumstance as I am, that the circumstances are indeed similar, in fact too similar, not to concluded that there is the existence of an evil conspiracy, with Britain to protect negligent doctors at all costs over the rights of those children and others that they negligently kill, also at the expense of the further suffering of the bereaved.

   This I agree, may well be a highly contentious issue, especially as I believe there are many coroners in the J R Morgan mould, hence the current call for reform of that office. However evidence is mounting to support my supposition, which if eventually proven will have the most profound impact on the administration of the UK justice, and policing system

   In conclusion may I respectfully draw your attention to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948)

   Article 8:

   Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the constitution or by law.

   Sincerely David Grothier.

3. david_grothier | August 6th, 2008 at 10:04 am
   

   In reply to the numerous emails,for which I thank you all, please be assured there is more that is happening.

   More abuses of your “right to know,” and regrettably more child deaths and cover ups.

   Both the Byes and the Powells have a wealth of further information, and if you are concerned I suggest, with respect that you contact them.

   We as bereaved parents or not unique, as right up and down this despotic country these things are happening with an all too familiar regularity. And when they do the corrupt administration kicks in to protect the NHS Trusts and their negligent killer doctors.

   The depth of corruption within the administration is vast, and these days can be linked directly to Common Purpose, as I have found out.

   But while these things continue to happen, they stifle any hopes of an improved quality of health care–-and a proficient accountably to the people–-and the system continues to erode your rights to justice.

   Based on what I have discovered, and the need for Coroner reform

   http://www.justice.gov.uk/publications/draft-coroners.htm

   is was quite elementary to discover that the office of the coroner is one of a highly dubious nature and of disservice to the communities–-The Byes have more on this.

   But above all people, these things can and do affect you, and if you love your children, grandchildren, nieces and nephews, and all children, and have looked into their trusting eyes–then for the Love of them and God, be on your guard.. For if you fall into the same trap as me, the Byes, the Powells and many others–-you really will feel a sense of helplessness.

   We here on this web site are guardingly proud of our sacred rights enshrined forever in the Magna Carta––-

   Why then are there those in the administration of justice in Britain, who would purposely seek to deprive us of such rights and continually abuse the laws of the land? Laws that they are they to protect and serve with honesty and diligence.

   In view of the following from the Magna Carta, the CPS, many UK police forces, and the newly formed Ministry of Justice need to be disbanded!

   Article 45. Of the Magna Carta 1215 states––––
   We will not make men justices, constables, sheriffs, or bailiffs unless they are such as know the law of the realm, and are minded to observe it rightly.

Leave a Comment