Smarting from a summer of virulently anti-capitalist, anti-globalist, anti-well-just-about-everything sentiment, the Gods of the free market pantheon gathered at a recent half day seminar on the causes of the financial crisis to discuss and debate their preferred solutions amongst friendly (present) company (accepted).
Opening the proceedings was a well delivered and typically urbane speech by Lord Nigel Lawson, former Chancellor of the Exchequer, and notable climate change heretic, er sorry, I mean skeptic. After a spirited if somewhat shrill defence of the wonders of globalisation, free markets and international finance capitalism, he moved on to admit that some fundamental errors of judgement were indeed made in our way to the current calamity. In particular, he mentioned the repeal of the 1933 Glass-Steagal Act as a major factor in the spread of the crisis from the speculative activities of financial institutions, into the mainstream commercial and high street banking sectors. This, he said, more than any other factor, led to the impossible logic of “too big to fail” and “bailout or die”, which has characterised the government’s response to the crisis up until the present time. With that much said, he then went on to argue in response to a question from the audience that the government could not arbitrarily set the parameters of what constitutes an institution that has become “too big to fail” as that would be an illegitimate political intervention into the private market by state actors!
But putting that small contradiction to one side for moment, one interesting fact he did reveal was that following the decision to de-regulate the London Stock Exchange in 1986, the “law of unintended consequences” quickly led to a situation where “characteristically more conservative” City of London Banking institutions were forced to break down similar chinese walls in their capital markets operations in order to compete with (my choise of words) greedy Wall St banks who were taking advantage of the newly opened door to swoop in and buy up huge swathes of British equity. Obviously, nobody really thought about that, or, perhaps they did. I will leave it to you to decide.
The rest of the itinerary focused on various different attempts to defend globalisation, open markets and economic liberalism as the “greatest engine of human progress and happiness ever invented”. Without doubt, while free enterprise, innovation and long term physical and financial economic growth are all very good things, ultra laissez-faire economic globalisation and free trade have certainly produced one thing: the greatest financial and economic collapse in world history. A collapse that is about to burst into our lives with the force of a nuclear weapon. Make no mistake, we are now in the death throes of the present financial system and in a matter of days or weeks from now, panic and chaos will break out as what is left of the system disintegrates in hyperinflationary explosion. This is already evident in the rate of collapse of the US dollar against almost all major world currencies, and the sudden and dramatic rise it the price of gold.
This is a truly terrifying prospect, but there is a glimmer of light in the fact that some even among the elite on the ultra-liberal, anti-nationalist ”right wing” is openly talking about a reversion to a Glass-Steagal standard in international banking regulatory affairs. This is extremely significant in that it would appear to indicate that a powerful faction of the Anglo-American establishment is sounding the retreat, circling the wagons and picking specific tactical battle fields on which to fight a long war, as opposed to moving in directly for the kill via the total collapse of the global financial and monetary system, and a breakdown of civilization into a new dark age.
On the surface at least, Legatum appears dedicated to some pretty laudable political, economic and social objectives, but then, for a private equity “foundation” based offshore in Dubai and publicly dedictaed to demonstrably insane economic theories, do we really believe the hype? We should watch what they do and say very closely over the coming months of intensified international crisis.
This post is tagged Finance, Glass Steagal, Legatum
[quote='mike' pid='1359' dateline='1255342924']
Smarting from a summer of virulently anti-capitalist, anti-globalist, anti-well-just-about-everything sentiment, the Gods of the free market pantheon gathered at a recent half day seminar on the causes of the financial crisis to discuss and debate their preferred solutions amongst friendly (present) company (accepted).
[url=http://www.ukcolumn.org/2009/10/12/recedentia-leg…ds-the-retreat/]Read the rest >>[/url]
[/quote]
The other source of info I have heard talking about the repeal of the Glass Steagal Act being so significant in the financial crisis, is from the website : [url=http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=home]Centre for Research on Globalisation[/url] – a lecture by Michel Chossudovsky:
[url=http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=11852]The Global Finacial Crisis[/url]
It says in Wikipedia, that “The banking industry had been seeking the repeal of Glass-Steagall since at least the 1980s.” But:
“The bill that ultimately repealed the Act was introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (Republican of Texas) and in the House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa) in 1999……The legislation was signed into law by President Bill Clinton on November 12, 1999. [14] ”
Communitarian President Bill Clinton – why am I not surprised? And the fiscal chaos we have here all evolves around Communitarians Gordon Brown and Tony Blair!
But UK MS newspapers all still call Gordon Brown “the BEST Chancellor we have ever had in Britain! And now he is a great Prime Minister! Huh?
“The bill that ultimately repealed the Act was introduced in the Senate by Phil Gramm (Republican of Texas) and in the House of Representatives by Jim Leach (R-Iowa) in 1999. The bills were passed by a Republican majority, basically following party lines by a 54-44 vote in the Senate[12] and by a bi-partisian 343-86 vote in the House of Representatives.[13″
Will the Clintons, Obama, Brown, Blair, Phil Gramm , Bill Leach and all those who voted for this repeal of the Glass-Steagall Act be punished, will their assetts be stripped from them to help the poor of America, and here in Britain? No. Why? Because we allow and accept -for some insane reason, that it is OK for governments and corporations to be a “CORPORATE PERSON” legally, so these individuals usually take no personal responsibility for terrible risks taken and terrible mistakes made. The corporate person is blamed, it’s all his fault! (This is a person who has no brain, no body, no feelings and is not real. That makes sense!)
http://www.monitor.net/monitor/9606a/corporateperson.html
Here, Professor Steve Russell describes,
“Corporations, like governments, are immortal..”
Yes they are similar now aren’t they?
And isn’t it interesting that, as corporations have become more like governments, governments are behaving like more like corporations with MPs, Senators, their advisors and spin doctors taking no personal responsibility for their reckless actions?
The wealth that Communitarians like Major, Mandelson, Blair, Brown, the Clintons, the Bushes, and all those in the banking industry who have caused this situation, should be confiscated from them. They should make amends for their damaging decisions and actions in kind, and not be able to hide behind the corporate body while becoming rich beyond their wildest dreams.
I advise all to think about joining or starting a LETS – Local Exchange Trading Systems or Schemes, which are local community-based mutual aid networks in which people exchange all kinds of goods and services with one another, without the need for money. http://www.letslinkuk.net
We can swap our vegetables, old furniture, shoes and baby clothes like serfs while “our masters” count the piles of silver and gold they’ve conned and bullied out of us!