History is a cyclic poem written by time upon the memories of man.
- Percy Bysshe Shelley
A gloomy and muggy summer weighs Great Britain down, punctuated by frequent and turbulent rain storms. Our weather seems appropriate, as the menacing clouds of a great and terrifying international storm gather around us. Can this be how our forbears felt when confronted with the horrific calamities of their times, a “war to end all wars” of death and carnage on a scale undreamed before?
If we are to believe the puerile media, a great recovery is “just around the corner”. The credulous and statistically inclined might just be fooled by such talk, if they were to base their perception of economic prosperity on the stock markets, which are just now rebounding with a perplexing vigour that belies the stark reality of the physical economic breakdown crisis that is now gathering speed, behind the charts and graphs of the perennial merchants of economic mumbo jumbo. But despite such frantic and misplaced optimism, productive jobs continue to be lost at an alarming rate, with wages and working conditions marching briskly along behind them, to the extent that even the largely toothless British Unions are beginning to stand up for their members and demand industrial action. As the famous adage goes, “there are lies, damned lies, and then, there are statistics”.
Meanwhile, the plight of UK PLC seems increasingly uncertain, as Peter “Prince of Darkness” Mandelson sinks his Europhile claws ever deeper into the levers of power, corrupting and unwinding great swathes of our sovereignty with every slimy touch of his malignant hands. Will he complete his mission of collapsing Sterling to pave the way for our final surrender to the EURO, and economic servitude to supra-national regulatory agencies who report to Brussels, rather than our national Parliament? And what of the “alternative” Tory proposals to disband the FSA, and hand all regulatory authority over to the proverbial men behind the curtain at the Bank of England, the great mothership of global usury? Either way, debt slavery to an ever increasing mass of illegitimate speculative claims against the public purse beckons.
But enough of this moribund national introspection, let us instead turn our attention to events inside the American “consumer of last resort”, where, despite all the recent hyperbole about “hope” and “change”, all is very far from well indeed.
Shockingly, in the last week of July, the Inspector General of the TARP told the US Congress that, in contrast to the $700 billion figure that was presented to the public as the cost of the Wall St bailout, in fact, when taking into account all of the sources being used to sustain the collapsing derivatives bubble, the figure is now up to a staggering $23 TRILLION. With such incomprehensible statistics, regardless of the myopic and trivial garbage we hear from the national and global media on a daily basis, there can no longer be any debate as to the fact that we are facing a planet wide collapse into a new dark age, as the US Dollar is crushed under a hyperbolic tsunami of speculative debt.
As of now, the majority of the US States are in technical, if not entirely yet literal bankruptcy, hurriedly forcing through emergency budget cuts that involve drastic measures such as the furlough of essential public sector workers, IOUs and other accounting tricks, as with the recent California budget that was passed at the 11th hour after intense negotiations. But despite such insane and desperate shenanigans, the absolute outer limit for such fiscal deck chair rearrangement is October, the end of the third financial Quarter. With official statistics reporting close to 10% unemployed, and unofficial ones at more like 30%, the States are increasingly caught in a vice between the twin jaws of collapsing state revenues due to escalating unemployment and increasing costs of lending as federal stimulus flows dries up and they are forced to borrow operating funds from the private money markets.
But why, you ask, am I focusing all of my attention on conditions inside the United States, when there is equal or worse desperation here at home in the UK? Well, as the quote at the beginning of this article implies, there is a historical parallel with what is happening to America, and what happened to the Weimar Republic under the weight of the manifestly unserviceable war debt that was imposed by the Allies at Versailles. Then, it was the lie that Germany had been the sole “cause” of the catastrophe of WW1, rather than the geopolitical machinations of the British oligarchy, which feared a land based network of trans-continental railroads as a threat to their Imperial control of world trade by means of their monopolistic maritime power. Today, the City of London, in collusion with the openly fascist regime that has installed itself under President “Nero” Obama, is out to bankrupt the United States of America, collapse the nation into riots and civil strife, and use the resulting chaos to impose a dictatorship on that country.
And what lies beyond the collapse of the United States, were such a diabolical plot to succeed? A world central bank and single currency, based on carbon credits, a vastly reduced population (witness the global push for legalized Euthanasia amongst other anti-population “green” policies), herded into population centres, micro-chipped, monitored and tracked on a 24/7 basis to ensure compliance with the (naturally, entirely benevolent) diktats of the new fascist world government. At the slightest hint of rebellion, the offenders’ “carbon credit” chip will be disabled, and he or she will be cast into social limbo to suffer a slow and agonizing death by starvation.
Sounds far-fetched? Well if you have not already done so, try picking up a copy of HG Wells’ The Open Conspiracy and/or The New World Order and take a good hard look at what is happening around you today. This conspiracy is not new, and is now nearing end game, unless the American people finally wake up to the nature of the enemy they, and all of humanity are fighting, and take back control of their country from the traitors on Wall St and their pet politicians in the Congress.
The Federal Reserve is bankrupt, and must be replaced by a new national Bank, under the relevant, far sighted provisions of the US Federal Constitution. Under such an initiative, and with agreement of the other major economic powers of the planet, the European financial oligarchy and their New Dark Age policy can be out-flanked, snatching victory from the jaws of defeat, at the point of maximum danger for civilization.
When men have nothing else to lose, in the service of freedom, and defence of their own lives and of those dearest to them, what other pragmatic course of action is there to take? For this is a crisis that will admit no error or deviation from what must be done to save us all from hell – a hell that was hatched from the greed of evil financial parasites and the weakness and foolishness of politicians who failed to understand the simple economic principle that what goes up, must one day come down, and my word is this system ever coming down around us now…
The hour is indeed late, but there is still time for the next cycle of our historical poem to be one of beauty and hope, a true Renaissance, and no more talk of a dystopian New World Order of slavery and despair.
People of Great Britain, you have nothing to lose but your chains, join our fight for a new international credit system NOW, before it is too late!
“.. the great mothership of global usury”
A fantastic line. I’ve watched Lyndon LaRouche speeches on video recently and he certainly seems to be the only American politician speaking sense on this issue. According to his site the crash is almost imminent. It almost takes my breath away when considering the staggering level of evil on display with this act of financial destruction. I may previously have scoffed when people used the word Satanic to describe the people involved. Not any more.
I took some time out to make an attempt to grasp the basics of banking and the monetary system and decided to try and write the script for a short film on the subject. Unfortunately it’s turned out far too long to do a video on my non-existent budget. I’ll post it on a separate thread in the hope that anyone with a greater understanding can review and either explain where I’ve made any mistakes or missed out any pertinent details. Even better if someone can come up with a shorter version I could still attempt a short viral video that may help raise awareness.
Back on the subject of Lyndon LaRouche I see his latest [url=http://www.larouchepac.com/webcasts/20090801.html/]webcast[/url] (which I plan to watch later) is entitled ‘the Fall of the House of Windsor’. I can’t help remembering John Harris in his ‘State of the Nation 2′ speech talking about how we need to protect the Queen. His opinion being that all the negative stuff that’s been written about here is part of a conspiracy to destroy the sovereign and that if she goes it’s ‘game over’. Well, who to believe? LaRouche or John Harris. I’m afraid that even if I take the middle ground, as expressed on here, that the Queen is largely in the dark over what’s happening and that the major players are the Royal males, I still can’t see a future for the Monarchy. How does this play in terms of the BCG’s vision?[hr]
For anyone who’s interested I’ve just posted my essay on a new thread called ‘the Great Banking Swindle’.
[quote='Revolution Harry' pid='618' dateline='1249502674']
Back on the subject of Lyndon LaRouche I see his latest [url=http://www.larouchepac.com/webcasts/20090801.html/]webcast[/url] (which I plan to watch later) is entitled ‘the Fall of the House of Windsor’. I can’t help remembering John Harris in his ‘State of the Nation 2′ speech talking about how we need to protect the Queen. His opinion being that all the negative stuff that’s been written about here is part of a conspiracy to destroy the sovereign and that if she goes it’s ‘game over’. Well, who to believe? LaRouche or John Harris. I’m afraid that even if I take the middle ground, as expressed on here, that the Queen is largely in the dark over what’s happening and that the major players are the Royal males, I still can’t see a future for the Monarchy. How does this play in terms of the BCG’s vision?[hr]
For anyone who’s interested I’ve just posted my essay on a new thread called ‘the Great Banking Swindle’.
[/quote]
Believe both, in a sense.
I don’t agree that we should support the Queen. We should deselect her, just as we have others. We should support the Monarchy. In fact, we must, because it is the Monarchy which is the other party to the constitutional contract. If we don’t fight for that institution, we will end up with Brown’s new “Bill of Rights” – written by politicians, for politicians, suspendable on a whim, and containing more on people’s obligations, rather than their rights.
We should deselect the Queen – she and her brood are as corrupt as they come, and quite possibly Satanic. Certainly Philip’s desire to be reincarnated as a virus is Satanic, and is clearly expressed in the policies of his WWF.
LaRouche is quite rightly pointing out the House of Windsor’s role in global organised crime. They bring shame on this country, in my opinion.
I think Mike has answered the question with sufficient clarity.
My personal opinion, outside of the constitutional implications of it, is that the concept of Monarchy is a relic of history and should be consigned to history.
It is time Great Britain grew up and learned from our cousins in America. Why can we not have a presidential system and Republican institutions, as they do?
Why should we be forced to tolerate a bunch of inbreeds who cling to their power jealously without heed to the suffering of billions of people on this planet who are falling under the control of their demonic policies.
Sadly, absent a political revolution, which MUST come on the heels of a true Renaissance of culture, we will get only worse evils if we tamper with the structure of our constitution in a crisis as grave as the one we have today.
For all the evils of Monarchy, I do not doubt that they will, in the end, resist an absolute tyrrany of the Parliamentary government, if sufficient numbers of British people stand up and say “ENOUGH!” at one time.
John has personal reasons to love and revere our Queen, but I have no such feelings for the Windsor family and would replace them all in a heartbeat, if better representatives of the British people, who have 21st century ideas for our nation and world, were available to take their place.
A well crafted and thought provoking article which triggered another sleepless night.
[quote='mike' pid='620' dateline='1249537538']
[quote='Revolution Harry' pid='618' dateline='1249502674']
Back on the subject of Lyndon LaRouche I see his latest [url=http://www.larouchepac.com/webcasts/20090801.html/]webcast[/url] (which I plan to watch later) is entitled ‘the Fall of the House of Windsor’. I can’t help remembering John Harris in his ‘State of the Nation 2′ speech talking about how we need to protect the Queen. His opinion being that all the negative stuff that’s been written about here is part of a conspiracy to destroy the sovereign and that if she goes it’s ‘game over’. Well, who to believe? LaRouche or John Harris. I’m afraid that even if I take the middle ground, as expressed on here, that the Queen is largely in the dark over what’s happening and that the major players are the Royal males, I still can’t see a future for the Monarchy. How does this play in terms of the BCG’s vision?[hr]
For anyone who’s interested I’ve just posted my essay on a new thread called ‘the Great Banking Swindle’.
[/quote]
Believe both, in a sense.
I don’t agree that we should support the Queen. We should deselect her, just as we have others. We should support the Monarchy. In fact, we must, because it is the Monarchy which is the other party to the constitutional contract. If we don’t fight for that institution, we will end up with Brown’s new “Bill of Rights” – written by politicians, for politicians, suspendable on a whim, and containing more on people’s obligations, rather than their rights.
We should deselect the Queen – she and her brood are as corrupt as they come, and quite possibly Satanic. Certainly Philip’s desire to be reincarnated as a virus is Satanic, and is clearly expressed in the policies of his WWF.
LaRouche is quite rightly pointing out the House of Windsor’s role in global organised crime. They bring shame on this country, in my opinion.
[/quote]
If we support the monarchy but deselect the Queen and her brood then who, in your scenario, would become the new monarch? Some other branch of the bloodline, possibly from Europe? It’s difficult to see who that might be. Skip a generation and go straight to William? We’ve no idea how far down the route to indoctrination into the ‘Windsor’ system he’s already gone. Would he really be any better? He’d also be a figure head around which the forces that have enslaved us may try to regroup.
I think it is time to ‘grow up’ and move to system without a monarchy.
[quote='Revolution Harry' pid='632' dateline='1249587443']
If we support the monarchy but deselect the Queen and her brood then who, in your scenario, would become the new monarch? Some other branch of the bloodline, possibly from Europe? It’s difficult to see who that might be. Skip a generation and go straight to William? We’ve no idea how far down the route to indoctrination into the ‘Windsor’ system he’s already gone. Would he really be any better? He’d also be a figure head around which the forces that have enslaved us may try to regroup.
I think it is time to ‘grow up’ and move to system without a monarchy.
[/quote]
Well, that might ultimately be what happens. But that would cause a constitutional crisis of such proportions that its unlikely you could avoid a civil war. One step at a time and all that.
There is no requirement whatsoever to select a monarch from “the bloodline.” The monarch is who we choose it to be. But in any case, whoever it is, the point is made – do what we say, or you’re out. No more bended knee. That’s for history. Just do your job.
I have read there is a plan to restore the Stuart dynasty to rule over the UK. After the EU takes over, of course ! And I think this is very likely. History suggests this may well happen.
I agree that it’s time to grow up and move to a system without a monarchy. Goodness ! If we can’t even do this what sort of nation are we ?
[quote='Robert' pid='647' dateline='1249671016']
I agree that it’s time to grow up and move to a system without a monarchy. Goodness ! If we can’t even do this what sort of nation are we ?
[/quote]
We’re a nation with a long history – one that most people will be reluctant to let go, even when its not too good for them. As a first step, we can get things working with what we’ve got, and so for me, getting rid of the Bank of England is a much higher priority than the Monarchy.
[quote='John Morton' pid='623' dateline='1249555809']Why can we not have a presidential system and Republican institutions?[/quote]
That what you’re getting – it’s called the EU.
Considering her age the wish to ‘deselect the Queen’ would seem to be destined to be redundant. Also, changing the ‘bloodline’ has only ever been done by the elite for the benefit of the elite, and in modern historical times with ill-effect. The overthrow of James II by the Whigs may still be contentious in some quarters but none can deny the effects of the cancerous growth of the English Parliament which resulted, and which led inexorably to our present deplorable condition. If the Conservative Party had not overthrown Edward VIII we might not be having this discussion. There were other solutions in both cases. In Edward VIII’s case the answer was morganatic marriage, I would suggest the solution in this case is the introduction of the main feature of ’salic law’ agnatic succession.
However, changing the bloodline changes nothing. The real problem is parliament, the EU is just parliament writ large. I say we need to ‘grow up’ and move to a system without parliament. Destroy parliament and the parliamentary system and global government will lose its foundation stone in this nation.
[quote='Vortigern' pid='660' dateline='1249815743']
I say we need to ‘grow up’ and move to a system without parliament. Destroy parliament and the parliamentary system and global government will lose its foundation stone in this nation.
[/quote]
What kind of system do you have in mind? What happens when you destroy Parliament?
Great summary of the current threats Mike.
The Anglo American warmongers and their usurious masters behind the scenes have since 9/11 slaughtered 1.9 million souls in Iraq, Pakistan and Afghanistan. This is the first stage in their plan for global warfare, coming soon.
The theft of trillions and the collapse of the western economies with its concomitant domino impact on the rest of the world will engender global famine and internecine warfare. Coming soon.
The last 60 years have seen startling growth in cancer deaths, new killers like HIV/AIDS and many more sicknesses. This new flu, and likely its vaccine, will bring more death. A new highly dangerous strain will emerge, they tell us, soon.
I often remark that the conjunction of War Famine Pestilence and Death on such a scale is reminiscent of the prophetic End Times. It is interesting to view the drawing together of these threats to the existence of mankind, rapidly approaching a dreadful confluence, then to consider the apathy and disinterest of the sheeple.
There isn’t an elephant in the room, there’s an enormous rabid bull elephant in must, bristling with weapons of destruction, weeping sickness and disease from its pores, eating everything in the house and now turning its baleful red eye on them. Meanwhile, they turn over the channel to watch “Britain’s Got Talent” (”But No Future”).
There has never been a time in the history of mankind when the flow of events pointed more certainly to the outcomes anticipated and yet the people were less engaged. This lack of engagement and suspension of reason, engendered by 60 years of post war propaganda and mind control in many forms is a modern day Judas Goat; their ignorance leads them into the slaughterhouse. Like children, they bury their heads under the sheets if you tell them a boogeyman is coming.
Well, the boogeyman is here.
I’m finding it difficult to arrive at alternative conclusions after reading these signs, interpreting the ebb and flow of current events and predicting the outcome, mindful of the hidden hands guiding the world’s history in the making. These same hidden hands gave us fascism, WW2, communist Russia, the Cold War, the War on Terror, the Great Depression (then and now). They think nothing of plunging the planet into global armageddon, think nothing of subjugating peoples and setting up death camps, always find willing servants amongst us to serve as Gestapo, Stasi, jackbooted villains of opression.
One example of hegelian reasoning going on: They have planned for years to give us this flu. High amounts of vitamin D are very effective at preventing this illness. High levels of vitamin D are obtained from the sun. They have been telling us to keep out of the sun for years, citing skin cancer. Many dark skinned people suffer from very low vitamin D (these eugenicist swine are race selective in their plans…) High vitamin D levels also combat cancer, hence the lower incidence of cancer mortality as the equator is approached, higher as you move towards the poles.
Love is the answer to all “how should we govern ourselves” questions. Begin with love and all else will follow. This one idea is the only effective response to the threats of evil that surround us, for only good can defeat evil.
Vortigern
If you think the EU is a presidential system you do not understand the EU, or presidential systems in general.
[quote='John Morton' pid='673' dateline='1249910272']
Vortigern
If you think the EU is a presidential system you do not understand the EU, or presidential systems in general.
[/quote]
Explain?[hr]
[quote='mike' pid='662' dateline='1249840661']
[quote='Vortigern' pid='660' dateline='1249815743']
I say we need to ‘grow up’ and move to a system without parliament. Destroy parliament and the parliamentary system and global government will lose its foundation stone in this nation.
[/quote]
What kind of system do you have in mind? What happens when you destroy Parliament?
[/quote]
I would rather a variety of institutions, either in parallel or arranged in hierarchy, including a monarch at top and a multitude of real local government below, rather than the centralisation and domination by parliament. So when when evil does again rear its head, as alas human nature being what it is it will do, then the whole body will not be infected and corrupted as has occured under the present system.
I am aware that it can be argued, as Oborne has so forcefully done, that the problem is the political class which transcends institutions. Clearly political parties would also have to be abolished (though in the ‘post-democratic’ state they already seem to be an irrelevancy) and I think if there is enough localisation it would be impossible for such a class to form and achieve dominance through every sphere of political activity everywhere all at the same time.
We must remember that our history is a history of institutional change, not conservation as some believe. At the moment things have changed for the worse. Who knows, perhaps the best we can hope for is a change to the not-as-worse, but we should always keep in mind that change is not only possible but inevitable. Bismarck said something along the lines that you cannot change the course of history merely steer and hope to land at a good harbour.
[quote='mike' pid='652' dateline='1249716146']
[quote='Robert' pid='647' dateline='1249671016']
I agree that it’s time to grow up and move to a system without a monarchy. Goodness ! If we can’t even do this what sort of nation are we ?
[/quote]
We’re a nation with a long history – one that most people will be reluctant to let go, even when its not too good for them. As a first step, we can get things working with what we’ve got, and so for me, getting rid of the Bank of England is a much higher priority than the Monarchy.
[/quote][hr]
Robert you are bang on, if this was done we would not have to worry about the Monarchy, but these Royalists will not go easy if the postings on this page are anything to go by
[quote='Quietman' pid='689' dateline='1250071083']
Robert you are bang on, if this was done we would not have to worry about the Monarchy, but these Royalists will not go easy if the postings on this page are anything to go by
[/quote]
If you’re referring to me, you’re missing the point. I am not a Royalist, far from it. Read the front page of the [url=https://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/]British Constitution Group website[/url], along with the section on the Constitution to get a flavour of my position. If we get rid of the Monarchy, we get rid of one of the parties to the Constitutional contract. Not clever.
I am not a Royalist. I am a realist. One step at a time is the way we need to proceed if we are to hold this country together.
I do not want to maintain the Windsors. I do want to maintain the Crown – an institution we should be running, but which has been subverted. I do want to maintain the Constitution, because it is ours, and the only way it should be changed is by referendum.
Unless the present Monarch is prepared to do her job, we should get rid of her. Choose someone else. Get on with taking back the sovereignty we should have, as the People. Particularly our economic sovereignty. I put getting shot of the Bank of England well ahead of getting rid of the Monarchy.
[quote='mike' pid='694' dateline='1250098716']
I put getting shot of the Bank of England well ahead of getting rid of the Monarchy.
[/quote]
I agree. The institution in most need of dismantling is the Bank of England and with it the ‘Venetian’ monetary system.
I recently came across an [url=http://www.intmensorg.info/matrix.htm/]article[/url] by a retired American judge that some may find interesting. It covers things from an American perspective but still has some information pertinent to this country. Here are a few snippets.
“One thing the Founding Fathers did not know, was that all of the Kings lands and all future acquisitions such as the AMERICAS, had been given and pledged by King John to Pope Innocent III and the Holy Roman Church, by the Treaty of 1213.”
“We are presently living under the Babylonian Talmud, which was introduced to England in 1066 and has been enforced by the Pope, various Kings and every religious Order since. ”
“Prior to 1066, many of the Kings subjects [Lords and Dukes] held allodial deeds to land, which are land grants from the King or past Kings and which prevented the present King or his agents from taxing, trespassing or enforcing his will upon those subjects. Land protected by an allodial deed and improved by a home made the subjects, Sovereigns in their own right and the king of his castle. In 1066, William the Conqueror defeated England and stole the Kings Title, his lands and the lands belonging to his subjects. From William I (1066) to King John (1199), England found itself in dire straights because it was bankrupt! During this span of time, parishioners routinely passed their land onto their family or to the church without the Kings permission. So the King invoked the ancient, “Law of Mortmain,” also known as “the dead man’s hand,” which is our modern day probate law. The Pope and the Vatican objected to the “Law of Mortmain” because the King owed the Vatican a lot of gold he had borrowed and this law now prevented the church from receiving gifts of land. In 1208, England was placed under Papal interdiction (prohibition) and King John was excommunicated. King John was ignorant of the teachings of the Bible and was made to believe by Pope Innocent III, that the Pontiff was the “Vicar of Christ;” the ultimate owner of everything on earth, and the only one who could grant the King absolution for his sins; providing the King make a suitable gesture of repentance to the Pope and the Holy Roman Church!
The word “VICAR” is defined in Webster’s 1828 English Dictionary, to mean, “A person deputized or authorized to perform the function of another, a substitute in office,” and thereafter, all of the Popes since Pope Innocent III, pretend to be Jesus Christ on earth. In his attempt to regain his stature, King John offered the Pope and the Holy Roman Church his Kingdom, plus 1000 gold marks each year as payment of a lease on the land, and he accepted the Pope’s appointed representative [appointed ruler] and swore submission and loyalty to Pope Innocent III and the Holy Roman Church. In 1213, a Treaty was entered into between the King and the Pope. The Treaty made the King a tenant of his former Kingdom and a trustee to the Pope and the Holy Roman Church. The Kings ancestors were later appointed Treasurer of the Vatican Bank and continue to serve in that capacity to date. [See: Treaty of 1213; and the Papal Bulls of 1455 to 1492; and The Selected Letters of Pope Innocent III concerning England from 1198 - 1216, Thomas Nelson and Sons, Ltd. 1956]. In 1215, the Barons of England reacted to the loss of their rights and privileges they once enjoyed before the 1213 Treaty, and so they revolted against King John and stormed the castle. Under the threat of death, they forced him to sign a document that recognized their stature and spelled out their individual rights! The document was named the Magna Carta.”