<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: These Are The Issues Now On The Agenda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ukcolumn.org/2009/06/02/these-are-the-issues-now-on-the-agenda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ukcolumn.org/2009/06/02/these-are-the-issues-now-on-the-agenda/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:09:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:35:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5360</guid>
		<description>The EEC was the brainchild of Hitler.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The EEC was the brainchild of Hitler.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:45:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5359</guid>
		<description>You are an anti-semitic half-wit, The Jooooos did it!, is the jesuits call. Trained by the Jesuits by any chance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are an anti-semitic half-wit, The Jooooos did it!, is the jesuits call. Trained by the Jesuits by any chance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: greg</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 10:25:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5357</guid>
		<description>Ron Paul is a Vatican shill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron Paul is a Vatican shill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 09:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5329</guid>
		<description>Hi All.

methusala.
They are going all out to attack those who move against the agenda, take heart, you are obviously doing the right thing...

I see Gordon Brown has colludded with the Queen to block FOI...They are making a mockery of the act itself...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All.</p>
<p>methusala.<br />
They are going all out to attack those who move against the agenda, take heart, you are obviously doing the right thing&#8230;</p>
<p>I see Gordon Brown has colludded with the Queen to block FOI&#8230;They are making a mockery of the act itself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kblanking</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>kblanking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 10:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5323</guid>
		<description>The British Constitution is part-written or uncodified.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The British Constitution is part-written or uncodified.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GFP</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>GFP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 08:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5321</guid>
		<description>I have a great affection for your Great Uncle, one of my &#039;Most Favourite Essays&#039; 
is his &#039; Mowing of a Field&quot;!  It was part of my GCE &#039;O&#039; Level English Literature syllabus
- a bit different to the sausage machine, everyone-does-the-same, &quot;Death of a Salesman&quot;
type of thing the States&#039; organising now!  So lucky you having such a great Essayist as
a great uncle!  

Actually I believe he wrote a rather amusing comment, something like:

The Irish should move to Holland and the Dutch should move to Ireland.
The Dutch, being an industrious nation, would produce enough food to feed the world(?) 
The Irish, being an indolent race, would let the dykes fall into disrepair and would be drowned.  (I love the Irish, so no malice intended by me, nor HB, I am sure).

I am quoting from very long ago memory,so probably rather inaccurate!

Cheers

GFP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a great affection for your Great Uncle, one of my &#8216;Most Favourite Essays&#8217;<br />
is his &#8216; Mowing of a Field&#8221;!  It was part of my GCE &#8216;O&#8217; Level English Literature syllabus<br />
- a bit different to the sausage machine, everyone-does-the-same, &#8220;Death of a Salesman&#8221;<br />
type of thing the States&#8217; organising now!  So lucky you having such a great Essayist as<br />
a great uncle!  </p>
<p>Actually I believe he wrote a rather amusing comment, something like:</p>
<p>The Irish should move to Holland and the Dutch should move to Ireland.<br />
The Dutch, being an industrious nation, would produce enough food to feed the world(?)<br />
The Irish, being an indolent race, would let the dykes fall into disrepair and would be drowned.  (I love the Irish, so no malice intended by me, nor HB, I am sure).</p>
<p>I am quoting from very long ago memory,so probably rather inaccurate!</p>
<p>Cheers</p>
<p>GFP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: methusala</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>methusala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5318</guid>
		<description>im pretty sure our rights will vanish in the new constitution, that way any complaints we have will be illegal and worthy of  prolonged internment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im pretty sure our rights will vanish in the new constitution, that way any complaints we have will be illegal and worthy of  prolonged internment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: methusala</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>methusala</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5317</guid>
		<description>im having problems as well life</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>im having problems as well life</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5312</guid>
		<description>Hi All.

Just in case.
After updating the galagtic alignment 2012 page on my sites,  11 June 2009, I recieved a strange call from BT, claiming I owe them money...I have just handed them £420 to bring me right up to date. I put this here as each time I update this page i get big problems...

Not bad for a conspiracy theorist...
PS Editor, I tried to place this on the correct post as a reply but it did not publish..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All.</p>
<p>Just in case.<br />
After updating the galagtic alignment 2012 page on my sites,  11 June 2009, I recieved a strange call from BT, claiming I owe them money&#8230;I have just handed them £420 to bring me right up to date. I put this here as each time I update this page i get big problems&#8230;</p>
<p>Not bad for a conspiracy theorist&#8230;<br />
PS Editor, I tried to place this on the correct post as a reply but it did not publish..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 22:12:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5308</guid>
		<description>Hi All.

Given the reality as far as the EU goes, the constitutional changes will have to be in line with complete absortion into the EU super state of regions. When you have each regional assembley in the UK and Europe having its own Foriegn Office.....Parlaiment and our democracy are to be dissolved.

The Queen did this very thing in Canada December last year, and instituted martial law. Things have changed dramatically in Canada since that move.

I fear we are miss-understanding the actual physical expression of martial law in its first stage, for me it has always been one of all out troops on streets, when in reality it is a system that still manages to remain in plain sight and just out of range... until...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All.</p>
<p>Given the reality as far as the EU goes, the constitutional changes will have to be in line with complete absortion into the EU super state of regions. When you have each regional assembley in the UK and Europe having its own Foriegn Office&#8230;..Parlaiment and our democracy are to be dissolved.</p>
<p>The Queen did this very thing in Canada December last year, and instituted martial law. Things have changed dramatically in Canada since that move.</p>
<p>I fear we are miss-understanding the actual physical expression of martial law in its first stage, for me it has always been one of all out troops on streets, when in reality it is a system that still manages to remain in plain sight and just out of range&#8230; until&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zadocthepriest</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Zadocthepriest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5306</guid>
		<description>If only - The US constitution is over 200 years old and is under greater attack now than ever in their history.  Free speech areas what are they?  - Areas where protest is permitted.  Is&#039;t the whole of theUS a free speech area?  Not since G.W.Bush was in office. So there&#039;s the first ammendment gone.  Right to bear arms?  And why not?  (The serfs in this country have had their spines ripped out for decades)  According to Obama&#039;s interpretation of the second ammendment a US citizen has a right to bear arms if he is a member of the police or the military.  That is i am sure not what the founding fathers had in mind when they penned that document headed WE THE PEOPLE.  According to those who would wish to change that document or imprint their own ate on it - &quot;The US constitution is a living document and therefore subject to change&quot;.  

My point?  If we ever got a bill of rights what do you really think it would look like?  Short of a real revolution with guns and bullets and blood - i doubt it would be worth the paper it would be written on.  Who was it said that the tree of liberty somtimes needs to be watered with the blood of true patriots?  

**** the politicians and the NWO i&#039;m at the front of the line so pass the ammo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If only &#8211; The US constitution is over 200 years old and is under greater attack now than ever in their history.  Free speech areas what are they?  &#8211; Areas where protest is permitted.  Is&#8217;t the whole of theUS a free speech area?  Not since G.W.Bush was in office. So there&#8217;s the first ammendment gone.  Right to bear arms?  And why not?  (The serfs in this country have had their spines ripped out for decades)  According to Obama&#8217;s interpretation of the second ammendment a US citizen has a right to bear arms if he is a member of the police or the military.  That is i am sure not what the founding fathers had in mind when they penned that document headed WE THE PEOPLE.  According to those who would wish to change that document or imprint their own ate on it &#8211; &#8220;The US constitution is a living document and therefore subject to change&#8221;.  </p>
<p>My point?  If we ever got a bill of rights what do you really think it would look like?  Short of a real revolution with guns and bullets and blood &#8211; i doubt it would be worth the paper it would be written on.  Who was it said that the tree of liberty somtimes needs to be watered with the blood of true patriots?  </p>
<p>**** the politicians and the NWO i&#8217;m at the front of the line so pass the ammo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zadocthepriest</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Zadocthepriest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5305</guid>
		<description>Ron paul is a great American, God bless him.  His book Revolution - a manifesto is an inspiration.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron paul is a great American, God bless him.  His book Revolution &#8211; a manifesto is an inspiration.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: festus</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>festus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5303</guid>
		<description>Hi everybody

I&#039;m new to this site. My maion beef is mainly in the field of anti-biopsychiatry.

Just to say I find the quality of argumentation and constructive comment herein to be a cut above many sites I&#039;ve seen. Currently I&#039;m reading Julia Middleton&#039;s &#039;Beyond Authority&#039; and I&#039;ve got much catching up to do to reach a more precise awareness concerning what&#039;s really being done to our country and what might yet be done to restore/ safeguard our rights as we know them.  I too all along have suspected that the expenses debacle was contrived as a means to far-fetchedly/ overreachingly introduce &#039;constitutional changes/reforms&#039;. Does anyone here have a clear idea concerning what form these constitutional changes are most likely to take and what political vision may currently be involved?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everybody</p>
<p>I&#8217;m new to this site. My maion beef is mainly in the field of anti-biopsychiatry.</p>
<p>Just to say I find the quality of argumentation and constructive comment herein to be a cut above many sites I&#8217;ve seen. Currently I&#8217;m reading Julia Middleton&#8217;s &#8216;Beyond Authority&#8217; and I&#8217;ve got much catching up to do to reach a more precise awareness concerning what&#8217;s really being done to our country and what might yet be done to restore/ safeguard our rights as we know them.  I too all along have suspected that the expenses debacle was contrived as a means to far-fetchedly/ overreachingly introduce &#8216;constitutional changes/reforms&#8217;. Does anyone here have a clear idea concerning what form these constitutional changes are most likely to take and what political vision may currently be involved?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Test</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Test</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5289</guid>
		<description>Aye</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aye</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 20:49:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5288</guid>
		<description>Hi All.
Just an after thought, I also include Freemasons, because i know you are good people, unfortunately, as with the religious institutions, your leaders are not as you are....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All.<br />
Just an after thought, I also include Freemasons, because i know you are good people, unfortunately, as with the religious institutions, your leaders are not as you are&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Life</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Life</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:47:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5284</guid>
		<description>Hi All.

I agree with your sentiments Robert.

What we had under common law, was the means to cordial society, a chieftain structure with the chief role to absolve disagreements among the people. The chief only took power in a time of war, and the chief was the sole diplomat between all other tribes.

This was the system in Sweden, a system so successful, many countries would ask that the Swedes come in and create the same in their lands, not rule or govern, but to show the way of balanced existence.

This system was the basis of the African tribes, matriarchal in their expression, not patriarchal. It was found in the native tribes of the Americas, North and South.

So we have a common ground under which the old matriarchal systems took their root. This system was the old Atlantean, NORDIC system, the peoples who left Atlantis around 52-36000 years ago. They made civilisation in Egypt also.

This is the teaching of my ancestors, whom I re-connected too after initiating under the true doctrines of all the symbolism found in all religions. In Egypt when the Hyksos took over from the Akkadian empire, the root of all that is evil, they mixed their Satanic mystery school with that of the Egyptian, and at the request of Nebuchadnezzar, who needed the sacred doctrines of the Hyksos to make his new tower ( belief system), to work. From this shadow coming together, of these Temple of the Sun which had taken over Atlantis,  came the Hebrew mystery school doctrine the Kabbalah, and the Talmud. This is what is meant when the Biblical tales talk of &#039;cutting one off from his people&#039;, they mean your ancestors by destroying the true doctrines and creating a lesser one or two or three.

The Talmud is the doctrine to ensure the demon takes its food from man, in the first instant to instil the blood rites which connects with the children of the shadows (abyss) and brings them fourth, then the paedophilia and rape within the Talmud which feeds the demon with the energy burst they require, and from this we get war, the destruction of our connection to nature (true paganism), and thus we lost the bridge to the heavenly spirits and source, NATURE IS THE BRIDGE.

When one studies Michael Tsarion and Jordan Maxwell, one is only playing with the shadow meaning to the symbolism, they want you to hate the new world order so they can instigate martial law.

Under the grail symbolism, the male which comes out of the female, is tasked to find his personal path set before his birth... to become the hero. In consciously taking on his initiation rite path, he undergoes the path into the labyrinth of the underworld. the underworld has many castles through which the hero must travel, the castle of sensuality, wealth, protection, power, etc, all these castles want the hero to forget his quest and remain with them, because they have failed on the quest.

This is symbolic of breaking down all the egoic aspects to man, for only the true immortal aspect to all man will leave all the castle behind to continue his journey to find the holy grail.

The final castle has the greatest of Kings, but this king is impotent, symbolised in his wound to the groin, the King cannot make manifest the spiritual realm into his kingdom, even though he is the greatest of men

The wounded king is so because he cannot give up his kingdom, thus he cannot enter the realm of the highest spirit. Parsifal of the grail stories is said to fail in his quest because he fails to ask the right questions of the grail . The hero  loves Guinevere, she can also see in him that he may just complete the quest, and gives him her energy, thus Camelot is broken. Success!!! 

So the grail story as we are given it, misses the real end, purposefully, to keep the idea of king alive and at the top, with the idea, Camelot must return as a kingdom.

The Lord of the Rings plays into this false doctrine also by presenting the idea we are at the time for the return of the King.


So what is the grail?

It is the place from whence we are born...it is the realm of the goddess in her highest form, because from the womb of the feminine energy is the universe born.

Can one see why the female is destroyed in the three religions of the line of kings?
They are the un-initiated failures of the spiritual quest, they are the shadow, who because they are refused the key to the kingdom of the heavens and LIFE itself... they hate spirit, they destroy mans chance to travel the quest for the grail.

Everything you know is but the shadow speaking, this is why good men join the sick parade and worship at the feet of sickness then wonder why they are not fulfilled in the spirit.
The Christian symbolism is this symbolism, Did not the King die....the pagan doctrines without the blood rites are also this symbolism.

Jesus did not die, his right to the Kingship died as he left the madness to continue his journey and teaching, the story is symbolic, but if you do not understand the story, the literal interpretation is then all you have, and as we know there are many who will happily pull you along by the neck with it ,for it gives them power......

Now it is time for all who claim to be Christian, Jew and Muslim, to understand my words and let us remove the sickness from power in this nation, and cease playing around with new systems that only mimic the shadow.

Thats revolution my friends.....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi All.</p>
<p>I agree with your sentiments Robert.</p>
<p>What we had under common law, was the means to cordial society, a chieftain structure with the chief role to absolve disagreements among the people. The chief only took power in a time of war, and the chief was the sole diplomat between all other tribes.</p>
<p>This was the system in Sweden, a system so successful, many countries would ask that the Swedes come in and create the same in their lands, not rule or govern, but to show the way of balanced existence.</p>
<p>This system was the basis of the African tribes, matriarchal in their expression, not patriarchal. It was found in the native tribes of the Americas, North and South.</p>
<p>So we have a common ground under which the old matriarchal systems took their root. This system was the old Atlantean, NORDIC system, the peoples who left Atlantis around 52-36000 years ago. They made civilisation in Egypt also.</p>
<p>This is the teaching of my ancestors, whom I re-connected too after initiating under the true doctrines of all the symbolism found in all religions. In Egypt when the Hyksos took over from the Akkadian empire, the root of all that is evil, they mixed their Satanic mystery school with that of the Egyptian, and at the request of Nebuchadnezzar, who needed the sacred doctrines of the Hyksos to make his new tower ( belief system), to work. From this shadow coming together, of these Temple of the Sun which had taken over Atlantis,  came the Hebrew mystery school doctrine the Kabbalah, and the Talmud. This is what is meant when the Biblical tales talk of &#8216;cutting one off from his people&#8217;, they mean your ancestors by destroying the true doctrines and creating a lesser one or two or three.</p>
<p>The Talmud is the doctrine to ensure the demon takes its food from man, in the first instant to instil the blood rites which connects with the children of the shadows (abyss) and brings them fourth, then the paedophilia and rape within the Talmud which feeds the demon with the energy burst they require, and from this we get war, the destruction of our connection to nature (true paganism), and thus we lost the bridge to the heavenly spirits and source, NATURE IS THE BRIDGE.</p>
<p>When one studies Michael Tsarion and Jordan Maxwell, one is only playing with the shadow meaning to the symbolism, they want you to hate the new world order so they can instigate martial law.</p>
<p>Under the grail symbolism, the male which comes out of the female, is tasked to find his personal path set before his birth&#8230; to become the hero. In consciously taking on his initiation rite path, he undergoes the path into the labyrinth of the underworld. the underworld has many castles through which the hero must travel, the castle of sensuality, wealth, protection, power, etc, all these castles want the hero to forget his quest and remain with them, because they have failed on the quest.</p>
<p>This is symbolic of breaking down all the egoic aspects to man, for only the true immortal aspect to all man will leave all the castle behind to continue his journey to find the holy grail.</p>
<p>The final castle has the greatest of Kings, but this king is impotent, symbolised in his wound to the groin, the King cannot make manifest the spiritual realm into his kingdom, even though he is the greatest of men</p>
<p>The wounded king is so because he cannot give up his kingdom, thus he cannot enter the realm of the highest spirit. Parsifal of the grail stories is said to fail in his quest because he fails to ask the right questions of the grail . The hero  loves Guinevere, she can also see in him that he may just complete the quest, and gives him her energy, thus Camelot is broken. Success!!! </p>
<p>So the grail story as we are given it, misses the real end, purposefully, to keep the idea of king alive and at the top, with the idea, Camelot must return as a kingdom.</p>
<p>The Lord of the Rings plays into this false doctrine also by presenting the idea we are at the time for the return of the King.</p>
<p>So what is the grail?</p>
<p>It is the place from whence we are born&#8230;it is the realm of the goddess in her highest form, because from the womb of the feminine energy is the universe born.</p>
<p>Can one see why the female is destroyed in the three religions of the line of kings?<br />
They are the un-initiated failures of the spiritual quest, they are the shadow, who because they are refused the key to the kingdom of the heavens and LIFE itself&#8230; they hate spirit, they destroy mans chance to travel the quest for the grail.</p>
<p>Everything you know is but the shadow speaking, this is why good men join the sick parade and worship at the feet of sickness then wonder why they are not fulfilled in the spirit.<br />
The Christian symbolism is this symbolism, Did not the King die&#8230;.the pagan doctrines without the blood rites are also this symbolism.</p>
<p>Jesus did not die, his right to the Kingship died as he left the madness to continue his journey and teaching, the story is symbolic, but if you do not understand the story, the literal interpretation is then all you have, and as we know there are many who will happily pull you along by the neck with it ,for it gives them power&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Now it is time for all who claim to be Christian, Jew and Muslim, to understand my words and let us remove the sickness from power in this nation, and cease playing around with new systems that only mimic the shadow.</p>
<p>Thats revolution my friends&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fremen</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Fremen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 16:40:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5281</guid>
		<description>&quot;Now the Book of Revelation makes sense! No wonder they want to rid the world of Christianity!&quot;

Most of us here know that organised religion has been used to control people as well as politics for thousands of years.

 

So what Bible Law do you not agree with specifically, either Spiritual or physical ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Now the Book of Revelation makes sense! No wonder they want to rid the world of Christianity!&#8221;</p>
<p>Most of us here know that organised religion has been used to control people as well as politics for thousands of years.</p>
<p>So what Bible Law do you not agree with specifically, either Spiritual or physical ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Newman</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 14:44:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=1006#comment-5276</guid>
		<description>This nation gave birth to John Wycliffe, to John Bunyan, to John Wesley and was for centuries a haven of toleration in matters of faith and religion. But it&#039;s today assaulted by all kinds of counterfeits. A fact which will surely, and soon, give rise to a brutal dictatorship in England.  The rule, in plain fact, of Romanism in all its corrupt forms, ranging from an enforceable political union with a Europe which is, itself, a marriage of church and state. And an England today presided over by a slothful dynasty, an unelected monarchy to which all political parties and their MP&#039;s pay their allegiance. A monarchy which, from the time of Magna Carta onwards, has prostrated itself before mamon and been sworn to upholding a marriage of church and state. An error that dates back to late Roman times. And  which, still today, postures as being the &#039;sovereign&#039; of England in place of our true national sovereignty. A system of government, in fact, whose head has been member of a ruling dynasty for a millenium, no less. An England whose entire landmass is today still owned by hidden &#039;lords&#039;, the details of which are kept from  general knowledge of the population. So that the illusion of land ownership of England is believed in by those who profit from it most and whose details are kept from view. Since even the landmass of England, every square foot, is today in the ultimate control of the unelected monarchy and its feudal lords. Or worse. 

I see no future in a political sense to this mess. Nothing short of a declaration of England by its people as an independent and sovereign nation, the final end of land &#039;ownership&#039;  in England and a declaration by an English government that in future all English land ownership is a thing of the past. That the estates of England should be administered by stewards and NOT by falsely named &#039;owners&#039; of English land. Since we are not communists or socialists but men who accept that we are stewards of this land and NOT its owners. 

You will of course continue to give the benefit of the doubt to monarchy and to the invasion that is popery. And it will continue to fleece you. It will stay silent as the EU takes over this nation. Having already  joined the EU in its corporate name of the &#039;UK&#039;, although the people of this nation, nor those of Scotland, Wales or Ulster were ever consulted. No mandate for this &#039;United Kingdom&#039; ever came from the people also. And so, twice in our history the people were defrauded, by the Parliament itself. Because, of course, these things were done in your name by Parliament and by its unelected head. The same Parliament who, today, have again convinced you that our national soereignty has been sent to Strasbourg in a suitcase. And you believe this myth, that national sovereignty can be bought, sold, exported, traded away, lost, surrendered, or negotiated on. When it cannot. 

The problem is the solution. It was and is the declaration of English national sovereignty, a final and democratic end to all vestiges of feudalism. An end to the scandal and the curse on our nation that is a marriage of church and state. An end to the iniquity of English land ownership and the Constitutional recognition that we are, at best, the stewards of this land which God us to live in.  The declaration of English national independence and the writing of a Constitution for England by we, its own people. The election of a parliament of men chosen as individuals to serve it. And not of political parties. 

Since the political system, itself, is riddled with corruption. 

Westminster, the monarchy, the system of party politics, the invasion of evil forces loyal to a &#039;New World Order&#039;, the rise of globalism, and of occultist influences within our national and local governments - all these things are ended by the assertion of our national independence. And by nothing else. 

Nothing short of a declaration of English national independence, the calling of men together to draw up its Constitution and to oversee the election of an English government can save this nation as a whole from reaping what others have sowed. 

Our national sovereignty and idependence is not obtained by election but simply by asserting it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This nation gave birth to John Wycliffe, to John Bunyan, to John Wesley and was for centuries a haven of toleration in matters of faith and religion. But it&#8217;s today assaulted by all kinds of counterfeits. A fact which will surely, and soon, give rise to a brutal dictatorship in England.  The rule, in plain fact, of Romanism in all its corrupt forms, ranging from an enforceable political union with a Europe which is, itself, a marriage of church and state. And an England today presided over by a slothful dynasty, an unelected monarchy to which all political parties and their MP&#8217;s pay their allegiance. A monarchy which, from the time of Magna Carta onwards, has prostrated itself before mamon and been sworn to upholding a marriage of church and state. An error that dates back to late Roman times. And  which, still today, postures as being the &#8217;sovereign&#8217; of England in place of our true national sovereignty. A system of government, in fact, whose head has been member of a ruling dynasty for a millenium, no less. An England whose entire landmass is today still owned by hidden &#8216;lords&#8217;, the details of which are kept from  general knowledge of the population. So that the illusion of land ownership of England is believed in by those who profit from it most and whose details are kept from view. Since even the landmass of England, every square foot, is today in the ultimate control of the unelected monarchy and its feudal lords. Or worse. </p>
<p>I see no future in a political sense to this mess. Nothing short of a declaration of England by its people as an independent and sovereign nation, the final end of land &#8216;ownership&#8217;  in England and a declaration by an English government that in future all English land ownership is a thing of the past. That the estates of England should be administered by stewards and NOT by falsely named &#8216;owners&#8217; of English land. Since we are not communists or socialists but men who accept that we are stewards of this land and NOT its owners. </p>
<p>You will of course continue to give the benefit of the doubt to monarchy and to the invasion that is popery. And it will continue to fleece you. It will stay silent as the EU takes over this nation. Having already  joined the EU in its corporate name of the &#8216;UK&#8217;, although the people of this nation, nor those of Scotland, Wales or Ulster were ever consulted. No mandate for this &#8216;United Kingdom&#8217; ever came from the people also. And so, twice in our history the people were defrauded, by the Parliament itself. Because, of course, these things were done in your name by Parliament and by its unelected head. The same Parliament who, today, have again convinced you that our national soereignty has been sent to Strasbourg in a suitcase. And you believe this myth, that national sovereignty can be bought, sold, exported, traded away, lost, surrendered, or negotiated on. When it cannot. </p>
<p>The problem is the solution. It was and is the declaration of English national sovereignty, a final and democratic end to all vestiges of feudalism. An end to the scandal and the curse on our nation that is a marriage of church and state. An end to the iniquity of English land ownership and the Constitutional recognition that we are, at best, the stewards of this land which God us to live in.  The declaration of English national independence and the writing of a Constitution for England by we, its own people. The election of a parliament of men chosen as individuals to serve it. And not of political parties. </p>
<p>Since the political system, itself, is riddled with corruption. </p>
<p>Westminster, the monarchy, the system of party politics, the invasion of evil forces loyal to a &#8216;New World Order&#8217;, the rise of globalism, and of occultist influences within our national and local governments &#8211; all these things are ended by the assertion of our national independence. And by nothing else. </p>
<p>Nothing short of a declaration of English national independence, the calling of men together to draw up its Constitution and to oversee the election of an English government can save this nation as a whole from reaping what others have sowed. </p>
<p>Our national sovereignty and idependence is not obtained by election but simply by asserting it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
