At long last the new edition of the UK Column newspaper has been published and is being sent to subscribers as we speak. You can click on the image below to download the pdf, but please consider subscribing for the real physical paper. There is no set fee for a subscription – please donate what you can using the Paypal link on the front page of the website.
May edition of the UK Column newspaper
This post is tagged UK Column, UK Column Print Edition
Man told to “act out murdering wife and mother” on training in Exeter
“This Country is controlled by invisible forces” – Bangkok Resistance
“the Devil is in the Vatican” – Pope’s Chief Exorcist
Helped out of prison – by man in Guy Fawkes mask
Anger over ‘graphic sex cartoon’ shown to 7 year olds
9/11 Truther shot dead outside Pentagon
Sinister forces – “A New Social Order”
Being outraged by pornography now a mental disorder
New False Flag attempt to damage activists?
Robert Green In Stonehaven Court Now
‘Climategate’ independent investigation funded by Climategate Uni
Internet Censorship protest shuts down government websites
Police ‘Drone’ makes first UK arrest
Police to “drag residents from their beds” to lecture them
(More details will be added in due course.)
10th Mar
13th Mar
20th Mar
10th Apr
It’s good to point out that those one million rebellious Britains don’t ‘not vote’. Remember what a post democratic society entails. They want us not to vote, and that is why they portray political parties so badly and never focus on issues. If you vote for a party that wants out of the EU then it is double the bang.
So far the story is positive, and even the BBC is treating anti-EU parties fairly. OK there is still bias but things seem to have improved considerably from 5 years ago. The situation is not so ‘us and them’ anymore either, and many in the press are doing the honourable thing and standing up for Britain. If you see someone in the press stand up for this country then just write and thank them. That’s all it takes, just a nice word to encourage them along.
Your latest Edition looks fabulous, as Joanna Lumley would say !
Dig Deep, get all the information and as they used to say “PUBLISH AND BE DAMNED”
The more the “People” know what is going on AND decide that “enough is enough” the stronger we become.
Good Work “
Tom,
I notice more and more people are querying the ‘Truth’ as told by the various goverments. Some are even quoting alternative sites to visit in the MSM opinion columns.
Things may be looking up.
Lets hope so.
In 2006 I was ordered by a family court judge in Stafford to have psychiatric treatment.
This treatment was ordered without a doctor of any kind being involved or examining me.
The judge ordered me to have the psychiatric treatment because I had refused to send my son on visitation to a rapist.
I am a child abuse survivor, from the Staffordshire Pindown children’s home – Chadswell Assessment Centre, and I do suffer rom PTSD, but the NLP “treatment” I was ordered to have was to “cure” me of Parental Alienation Syndrome – which was invented by the American paedophile psychologist Richard Gardner.
I am in fact perfectly sane.
We live in a police state already.
The full true story of who is behind this nwo heist is told by the very learned Joseph P Farrell. Visit project camelot and scroll down the interviews, all the nazi web has been researched by him for many years at Oxford. The nazi party has and does live on, secretly developing it’s weapons and it’s dogma to the point where the treacherous scum we call politicians roll over and crush us for their own skins. The wealth of international banksters has been borrowed nazi money and now it’s payback time and Brits and Yanks are going to suffer most.
This tells you all you need to know:-
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=5851104821474981851&hl=en
That’s a good newspaper, well done to all concerned !
Have started reading this newspaper and would make 2 comments so far:-
1. Excellent work!
2. I need to get out of the UK. This is now getting very scary, especially the piece about dissidents potentially being sectioned. We really are entering Soviet/Nazi territory and personally I don’t feel safe anymore.
A favour please? Can anyone tell me if there is a country anywhere in the world where it’s safer?
I’m asking because I think I need to get out before it’s too late. I’d love to stay here and fight with you but I’m a single parent and my children come first – I need to know they are safe and I don’t think they will be if we stay here.
This doesn’t feel right to me and I feel like we’re sitting ducks. As I’m writing this I’m watching RT (Russian TV on Sky) and they’re talking about events following the 2nd world war and in particular the nuking of Hiroshima. This is who we’re dealing with and these are the sort of things they do – nobody is safe with this lot in control. There must be somewhere on this planet where one can avoid the fall-out. Ideas anyone?
Hi Sharon’
Sorry no suggestions on places of safety; but if fall out is your concern you could order some K103 which is potassium iodate. It fills the receptors in the thyroid that absorb radioactive iodine which is what causes cancer from fall out.
Sharon, I lived on a little island off the coast of australia it was beautiful amd although I think the NWO is likely to be imposed on Australia too (unless we stop ‘em!) I think the island I lived on was much easier to be self sustainable, we grew bananas, pineapples, tomatoes etc. Its my dream to move back to that island and build a walled (hidden) garden growing all my food. Also I went fishing each day and caught lobsters, mackerel, tuna, mudcrabs, all sorts. So therefore money is quite irrelevent there. I hardly had to work any hours to survive there, it was paradise, literally! Also being on a small island there are many caves and hills so there would be place to hide if it got that bad. A bit like how you had the ‘Forest Brothers’ who escaped the KGB and they went and hid in the forests! Thats gonna be me!!!
These are some photos I took while I lived on the island. You are welcome to join me if I go, the more the merrier!!! Theres quite a few Brits on the island who, like me, fell in love with the place and decided never to return to life in UK!
I am hoping to move back there as soon as I can, hopefully by the end of this year or early next year. I pray that it wont be too late by then.
http://www.getaroundisland.com/page17.htm
Feel free to email me at holographic_universe@hotmail.com and I can give you my proper email address (thats my cryptic one without my name LOL) so we can talk further cos its really good to join forces and plus none of my girl friends seem to care about what going on which drives me mad cos I feel like saying “everything is NOT gonna
just work itself out….!!!” Arghhhh. So difficult trying to wake people up. Anyway would be great to discuss these things with someone so if you would like to get in touch then feel free!
Hi Liz,
I did reply – I sent you an email to the address you provided. Look forward to hearing from you.
Regards
Sharon
Thoght the same thing 5yrs ago, so found an island in the med, beautiful place, the south is infested with un-vibey people, but the very north is lovely, real paradise..could have stayed foreever, but ran out of money, now back in blighty, skint!
I am pleased we have this publication but it has two MAJOR FAULTS.
1. You cant run articles on Christianity, Religion Jesus etc. This puts people off. Avoid religion at ALL COSTS. You are trying to achieve 1million people in lawful rebellion, this will only hinder that.
More importantly…
2. Kill the anti-gay undertones. This isn’t the first time I have noticed them. Its not very ‘free and open’ and if people cant see what I am hightlighting I would go back anc read it again. There are some bad connotations being made and again this will not help in reaching 1 million in lawful rebellion.
I see opinions coming across rather than a non biased portrayal of facts.
Then I would recommend this newpaper to EVERYONE and post it on as many forums, websites, as possible.
MM
Marko,
Thanks for the comments. In response:
1. I am personally not Christian. Others at the UK Column are, and they wish to present that. I don’t have a problem with that, why do you? I think its about time we all grew up a bit on this issue. If you are not Christian, don’t read the page. Better still, do read the page, and see whether there’s anything in it that challenges you.
2. Do you have an example?
By the way, the UK Column is not the British Constitution Group. Yes, there are some UK Column staff working on the British Constitution Group project, and we all support its aims, but there is a much broader group of people behind the British Constitution Group.
Thanks for the swift reply.
1. I was raised Catholic, Christian and it has nothing to do with that specific religion. Its got everything to do with how people perceive what it is we are trying to achieve. Many people will be interested and want to get involved, but they will be put off as soon as they see any mention of religion. I think people should be able to speak about anything that they want, but many potential new comers will think twice if religion is involved. Sadly, many people are like that.
A classic example is the amount of stories that break out from indepenent news channels that get slated as soon as they appear on a religous site or forum. Its got nothing to do with a specific religion, its the perception this gives out to other people. People are very cautious, I am not by the way, but I know many who are.
I am not bothered by it, but I am always looking at things with an open mind and with a broader perspective and I know many people who would be interested in the movement, but just as quickly put off it it had any religious tie in’s.
2. This to me is obvious as 3 other people have mentioned it to me independently. Re read the articles in the sense that you are a member of that demographic and tell me it doesnt make you feel a bit singled out or made to feel it’s wrong.
there are connotations in there and again this is not only me and I am not here to put a downer on the publication as I really like it and I want it to succeed, which is why I am being brave enough to highlight the above for others to debate.
I dont want to give the opposition any scope to come back at us or taint the hard work that is put into bringing this publication together.
If I thought it was just me I’d have left it at that, but others are seeing it.
MM
Marko,
Why are you worried about what other people will think? Surely it is up to the other people you worry about to express their views on this or any other subject? If they don’t like what we print, they won’t read the paper. Simple as that.
It is ridiculous to suggest that we should change what we print in order to be popular. It is popular opinion which has led to people’s inability to act when they need to. It is popular opinion which is behind such insanity as political correctness. Why would we pander to popular opinion?
We print this paper and produce this website for the very reason that popular opinion is the thing that has got us in this mess in the first place. If we can’t move the majority away from it, we can’t win this fight.
So, I don’t accept your criticism. Instead its about time the silent or complicit majority abandoned popular opinion as well, and stood up beside us to fight this fight, and then, as Mark Welsh said elsewhere, we could re-educate, re-invest, re-industrialise and productionise this entire country and have approx zero unemployment, in no time.
As for your second point, I am not a member of that demographic, so how can I read it as such? I suspect only those who have been on Common Purpose training could do that … If you can cite a specific example, I will respond to that. Otherwise I can’t make a rational comment, other than to say nonsense. Sorry.
For an editor you seem very opinionated and biased.
‘if they don’t like what we print, they won’t read the paper. Simple as that.’ So as someone who helps to put the paper together, you don’t care what people think or take their comments on board? In fact, you haven’t even addressed my comments in a professional capacity, you’ve been down right rude!
that means you only care about what you think so long as everyone else thinks the same and if they don’t you dont care. hmmmm very fair and open and democratic dont you think?
“It is ridiculous to suggest that we should change what we print in order to be popular. It is popular opinion which has led to people’s inability to act when they need to”
No it’s not ‘popular opinion’ its manipulation actually. Do you have a fear of being popular and as far as i can see i didn’t mention this, you have brought this up, not me.
You cant see the bigger picture can you? It’s not about religion, so why even get into it. Anyone with half a brain cell can see how this divides and causes problems, the very reason why you are arguing with me over a comment i made and the very reason people who are taking their first steps into our world would run the other way. But you don’t care because you dont want to be ‘popular’.
“We print this paper and produce this website for the very reason that popular opinion is the thing that has got us in this mess in the first place”
ITS NOT! its manipulation by the few powerful elite. It doesn’t matter whats popular or not, they have all the power at the moment. There is a shift in attitude and people are waking up and this might scare them, but it doesn’t stop them.
This paper should be about THE TRUTH! thats it. forget popularity or public opinion or anything else. it should also be IMPARTIAL.
“As for your second point, I am not a member of that demographic, so how can I read it as such? I suspect only those who have been on Common Purpose training could do that … If you can cite a specific example, I will respond to that. Otherwise I can’t make a rational comment, other than to say nonsense”
So you are telling me you cant see yourself in some else’s shoes? You cant imagine what it would be like to be, say a muslim, and see it dragged through the press as the most evil thing and that everyone of them is terrorist? You cant see how making remarks about someone’s sexual orientation is offensive to them? YOU ARE AN IDIOT. Seriously! Only CP can do that? No, only a human being with respect for others can be able to do that. in case you haven’t noticed they pick people who are not like that to train them to think like that while still holding their original prejudices. Surely you’ve figured that out by now?
You want examples eh? heres what other people thought about what i said:
“I agree with the points made here, excellant mag and i think if it was viewed by more people then the powers that be would have a greater problem in hiding things the way they do. Just needs to stay on the important issues, religon and gay remarks just throws you off the really important issues at hand.”
“Just Finished reading – TOTALLY AGREE WITH THESE COMMENTS”
The comment about Alan Duncan, JOKINGLY, mentioning killing Miss Prejean for stating that marriage should be between a man and a women and then saying “Mr Duncan is a homosexual and married to his partner James Dunseath. What a brave women for speaking her mind (YEA FORGET THE FACT THAT HER COMMENTS MIGHT BE INSULTING, HARDLY PROMOTING FREEDOM IN A DEMOCRATIC SOCIETY WHERE WE ARE ALL EQUAL, IS IT?)
“Faced with a choice between Miss Prejean and offensive Tory Duncan the real lady wins”.
If you cant see how that would be insulting, when SHE was the offensive one and he made a joke about it, then you have a problem.
Jump all over this comment that was a joke to have a go at the Torys, and yes they deserve to be shown for the puppets that they are, but ignore the Real offensive remark that she made.
Get a grip. I wont even start on the comments about Academy Schools. I might not agree with teaching sexuality in school, because you should be taught safe sex only and the rest comes naturally, but you paint this picture of anything other than straight being bad.
Theres plenty of ways i could have tackled that story without sounding insulting.
but hey, me and the other guys must be wrong, and you must be right that it’s all innocent and not offensive. What sounds more CP to you?
MM
I’m replying to this post and the one below by Mark/Marko.
Sorry to say that I have to agree with Mark/Marko. When I first made a comment on the newspaper I had only read the first two pages and, as I stated above I thought they were excellent. However, when I got to the bit about the gay tory MP story and the religious article I had the same thoughts as Mark.
I agree that trying to be popular isn’t the best way of going about things but that isn’t the point. Look at your objectives – you need people on side and I’m not suggesting you achieve that at any cost but leaving out religion and anti-gay sentiment will bring more people to the cause. It’s just the way things are. The religious side makes for easy criticism and will cause people to dismiss ALL of the paper because they will think it lacks credibility. Right or wrong that’s how people think.
I don’t think now is the time for idealism, more important issues are at stake.
Regards
Thank you Sharon, thats all I was trying to say. I gave my examples, I’ve let other people read it and they have ALL come back with the same criticisms. My comments could have been met with a simple ‘Ok thanks for your thoughts, can you please elaborate’. But that’s clearly not what I got.
I know how important this is, thats why we have to do it right. I know how easily insulted the editor might feel because he’s no doubt spent tireless hours over it. This is why I emailed him privately, but he preferred a debate on here.
Its not an attacked, its an observation made by many people. i would take out that Tory section and just try and be more balanced when talking about things in future. There is no mention of being gay as being acceptable, just statements of it ‘not being the norm’.
Its the 21st century, we are all fighting the same cause.
Mark,
To clarify, I am the editor of the website, not of the newspaper. That honour goes to Brian Gerrish.
“that means you only care about what you think so long as everyone else thinks the same and if they don’t you dont care. hmmmm very fair and open and democratic dont you think?”
No, what it means is that your argument that we should leave something out because people might be offended is wrong as far as we are concerned. That’s all.
“You cant see the bigger picture can you? It’s not about religion, so why even get into it. Anyone with half a brain cell can see how this divides and causes problems”
The manipulation and misrepresentation of religion does that. Not the religion itself. That’s why more and more people are leaving churches of all denominations and going back to having their own groups holding meetings in their own homes.
“ITS NOT! [popular opinion] its manipulation by the few powerful elite.”
Yes, absolutely. But a fairly key technique of the manipulation is via the medium of popular opinion as expressed in the mainstream media. Its a brainwashing exercise, as I think you will probably agree.
“You want examples eh? heres what other people thought about what i said”
Which other people? Will they come here for a discussion?
“he made a joke about it”
Was it a joke? Did you see HIGNFY? Didn’t seem like a joke to me. Seemed like he said what he felt and then tried to make a joke out of it.
This business of offense … it seems a bit strange to me. Who’s problem is it if someone says something and offense is taken. Are you saying on one hand that we are manipulated by elites, and on the other that we should not speak our minds because someone might take offense? Isn’t this political correctness? Behavioral manipulation at its worst?
As I said earlier, I am not religious. Yet I do not have a problem with the religious page because I am happy to accept that some of my colleagues have different beliefs. I am happy to read and listen to what they have to say, because in my experience, they often say something that challenges me. I don’t get offended by being challenged. I’m not scared of the fact they have a different world view to me. We share enough common ground that we can work together, and work closely at that.
well said
‘The manipulation and misrepresentation of religion does that. Not the religion itself. That’s why more and more people are leaving churches of all denominations and going back to having their own groups holding meetings in their own homes…’
It’s so encouraging to read this. Finn Hagan’s column on p. 12 of the latest UK Column mentioned it too. We left organised church four years ago because we were sick of the compromise, wishy-washyness, Spiritless, emasculated kind of life which was bing put forward by the leadership as that that Jesus Christ has to offer. We were no longer impressed and finally decided, after a lot of prolonged soul-searching and inner conflict to strike out into the wilderness and follow the Way shown us. It’s been tough, but we wouldn’t go back for anything. The worst days outside organised religion are better than the best inside.
Read ‘So You Don’t Want to Go to Church Anymore?’ by Jake Colsen. Blow all the cobwebs away.
Hello Mark
First of all thank you for reading the paper and being kind enough to email in. I have been a volunteer editor of the UK Column newspaper for some time and my policy has always been that the Column will speak out on issues without worrying about the politically correct society we live in. Political Correctness is cultural marxism and is designed to make us fearful and control our minds – so as to facilitate the imposition of the New Order. It is highly divisive and dangerous, especially for children and young people.
From time to time people do say what they think we should and should not print. Some say we are too brash, some say we are too hard on politicians, this party or that party, or we should have more gardening and cooking articles. Some say we should have more pictures and shorter articles “like other papers”. But we are not like other papers. We are working our socks off to tell people what is really happening and trying to wake them up to the emergence of a vicious police state.
Over the 3 years we have been publishing, the paper has steadily grown in size and distribution, and we almost cannot cope with the number of people communicating with us each day asking what they can and should do to stop the police state. On that basis what we are printing is working. The word is spreading and fast.
That includes the truth. The truth is not impartial, far from it. The truth hurts. Whether it is understanding how we have been betrayed by banks, religion, politicians or the British Empire, or it is understanding what we have always believed is wrong, or it is understanding our own weaknesses and faults. Or knowing that children are being trafficked by the state, and being sexually assaulted by those supposedly protecting them. Or understanding that there is morality and there is immorality.
We have excellent relations with Muslims and those of other faiths – so that issue is just not a problem.
Neither is the fact that we have a Christian page. The police state regime establishing itself in this country and world wide is evil at best and satanic at worst. If you don’t believe in evil, or the evil actions of men, then you live in a world of deception. The counter to evil and satanism is faith in a loving God, love for each other, and for Christians, faith in Jesus Christ. This is not the same as religion or the church, both of which are corrupted.
The Christian page is important and as Mike has said, please don’t read it if you prefer not to. Have you ever wondered why the socialist state always tries to suppress Christianity? It is because that since they are on the side of evil, they are afraid of it.
New Subj: Alan Duncan is an interesting case. Are you saying to me that if Miss America had “jokingly” said she would kill Mr Duncan because he is a homosexual, there would not have been howls of outrage from the homosexual community? His comment was appalling and, having watched the programme myself, certainly not funny. I do not value his values in the slightest as a man or as a politician.
We value you as a reader and supporter however, and the UK Column has and does take onboard comments from our readers. Will we soften our message to bring a ’softer’ wider readership onboard?…..the answer is no. Time is too short and the ’soft’ people are too frightened to act. They are cowed by political correctness. There is no other paper like the UK Column, telling people the truth as to the regime emerging from the shadows. I very much hope that you will stay with us, but respect your decision if you choose to go. Rgds Brian G
Hi Brian,
I thank you for a constructive response, it is very much appreciated.
I know exactly where you are coming from and fully understand the very valid points that you make.
The point I am trying to get across is that a lot of people will use those articles and remarks to make the hard work and efforts look hypocritical of what it is you are setting out to do.
Of course the truth hurts, but it’s always important to understand your audience. I know not everyone can be accommodated for, but i wouldn’t have bothered to raise these issues if other people had not independently confirmed the same thing, otherwise I would only be doing it based on my perception of the information.
Sharon noted my point on religion. Its not about a specific religious group, not at all. its about a majority of people being put off because it has such a delicate area and a very complex one at that. I just think that by covering it in the newspaper it will hinder things. yes this is down to a lot of peoples ignorance, but so many fear religion and spirituality.
i agree completely with your statement on the spirituality and religion not being ‘the church’, but not enough ‘joes on the street’ will make this distinction.
these people clearly are evil out for an evil means.
Alan Duncan obviously shouldn’t have made such stupid remarks, but to go full swing and say what she said was right and ok, is not the answer. They were both wrong, but that article did not address that, only his stupidity for saying it. Do you see where I am coming from?
Reporting the truth is the most important thing, but it is easy to get caught up in the emotion of it all and not realise that a certain perception is being made and put out there that other people can pick up on.
the important thing in all of this, is that people can see the comments and know that it was not meant to be put across in that manner. But a lot of people did think that when reading it, so surely the outcome of all of this has been an important and worthwhile one?
i am certainly not going to stop being a supporter because of a debate over an article, not at all. If anything, the very fact you have taken the time to reply shows the level of commitment that you have and shows you care about your supporters.
For me its nothing to do with PC, or being branded CP. it’s all about respect for other people and clearly you have demonstrated that in your response.
Its easy to see how easily people can become offended by someones comments. Had i have received your reply first, it wouldn’t have dragged on like it has!
I believe its very important to appeal to everyone, regardless of age, sex, sexuality, religion etc and if some topics are close to the bone, it should be noted that you are not painting everyone with the same brush, even though you are not, it can be perceived as that.
i hope my point is understood, its not as easy as sitting down with a pint and talking about things. text can grammar can be very misleading.
best regards
Mark
Another great edition, full of gripping articles – well done indeed UK Column.
Please keep the paper exactly as it is, it is wonderful!
How dare a bunch of dictatorial trolls demand you change anything!
If the trolls don’t like it they should go and print their own paper. In fact I wish they would just GO full stop – and find another place to spout off their malign rubbish.
If gay MPs behave badly they deserve an kick up the **** just like any other MP. Why should they be “special” and have their feelings spared? This is an example of EXACTLY the kind of PC restraint the UK Column is fighting. The trolls here are becoming so obvious now they are pathetic.
The Christian page in the UK Column is highly valid, very important, and should stay.
Cheesy, I think you should go and join the dictatorial crowd because your points seem to be leaning towards: it’s either my way or it’s the highway, no dissent here please, how dare you provide constructive criticism – this appears to be your stance. People who think like this cause many problems in this world. You don’t have to agree but please do maintain some dignity. In fact, take a leaf out of Brian Gerish’s book, ie. check out his response and try to learn from it.
As to your response below which was aimed at my post in which I expressed my worries and thoughts of moving away.- let me ask you something: If you were a single parent (female) with children and absolutely no support and no protection would you not think of moving your children to a place of safety? That instinct, as a mother, takes absolute priority. So next time you want to call someone pathetic maybe you consider that their circumstances may be different to yours.
Bit of advice: start to open your mind a bit more and you may actually be useful in this situation.
Hi Sharon I understand how you appear to be frightful, and wanting to protect your family, but really their is no where to run to, so do not make any hasty decisions without thinking it through, also I do believe that you are part of the New World Health Alliance led by Dr Mathias Rath, so if you are you must also be aware that he is also fighting a heroic battle against the same shower of Gangsters, if you are part of our organization then if you wish you can contact me through Mr Bob Hook
Cheesy let me get this straight , no pun intended. You come on here attacking me and Sharon when you clearly haven’t understood the point being made.
Futher more, you try and use ridicule without even RESPECTFULLY, entering into the debate.
You should take a leaf from Brians comment and my reply, because thats now people should debate. No Malice involved.
You make yourself look to almost be a sheeple following the party line. No one can question what is written as it is sacred. Seriously, thats what it sounds like.
Well sorry mate, I’m not a puppet of a sheeple, and I am not saying that anyone else on here is I am talking about me. I will question EVERYTHING, and look for the motives behind it.
I will not go on a one man rampage because I have a set opinion. I made my obersavtions based on other peoples independent feedback. If doesn’t have to change anything, but now Brian is aware that a perception was picked up by some readers. Wouldn’t he rather know this than not at all?
People need to stop seeing the world through ‘labels’. Forget ‘Gay Tory MP’. See it as two people. Both making unjust comments, so neither of them should be shown any support.
Now, just because Tony Bliar is trying to appeal to the church or vatican, to have them be more relaxed about how they regard gay people, doesn’t automatically, by evil association, make it wrong. BUT, a lot of people would see it as that. That’s why it’s important to run the story to show people how shallow and desperate he is to appeal to anyone and everyone, but at the same time make it clear that what he is saying isn’t wrong, it’s his back handed, twisted motives that is being exposed.
Does this make sense? I cant make it any clearer!
Sharon – pay no attention to ignorence. Dont let immature peoples comments get to you.
MM
Mike, Tried calling you. Will try again tomorrow if I can.
Re: my post above. Where it says I’m replying to this post and the one below, it should say to the posts above (sorry didn’t realise my post would slot in where it did).
End of Brown start of Cameron = both puppets of the New World Order.
Once the Illuminati run out of steam they use the two party scam to put in a new puppet to reinvigorate their agenda, and people laughably think they’re getting a new government with new ideas!
When will people see through this ridiculous scam, even now David Cameron is calling for CHANGE! Now where have I heard that before???
Anyway if anyone hasn’t so far please get over to You Tube and watch the Obama Deception and also email them at support(AT)youtube.com over the suspension of the Alex Jones Channel?
I had no idea they suspended Alex Jones on YouTube. What utter d**ks!
I guess it’s starting then, what with that and what our gov are bringing in.
Do you know where else Alex’ shows can be viewed?
itunes has his podcasts. 4hrs long, so quite meaty! and they are free. i didnt know they took him down.
time to start fighting back.
By doing what? Arguing with the UK Column, and getting scared and trying to run away to “..a country anywhere in the world where it’s safer?”
You two are a joke!
Cheesy,
As and individual, do you expect to hold, or expect others to hold precisely the same views on every subject? If that were so it would be a very grey world indeed don’t you think? Surely the point of this whole exercise (albeit it is far more than an exercise) is that we are speaking out for the liberty, freedom and individuality which every person has and has the right to hold?
That being the case, there MUST be arguments/debates/disagreement otherwise we are simply boxing ourselves in to another “must have or you’re not one of us” scenario. Surely (and I know this is the case) the UK Column AND the BC Group are embracing the idea of individuality and the acceptance of such, otherwise it would be a lost cause.
I’d suggest that you perhaps reassess your views regarding the RIGHTS of people to express THEIR views and disagreements since this is what is powerful. It demonstrates the capability of people to have very opposing views whilst working positively together for a mutually beneficial and positive goal.
Meanwhile, those who have (and it includes myself) spoken regarding some of these issues, are doing so with the best intentions FOR the group as a whole. I am sure Brian, Mike and John can appreciate this and while they may not agree, would they wish to have people who simply take what they say and never question it or question its validity or how it may impact others?
I am sure they see it as coming from people who are seriously interested and supportive of the goals and yet are attempting to provide constructive criticism. For the other road would simply be apathy and apathy is and has been a major part of the problem we are now faced with.
Sometimes things can get heated in exchange however, the strength of any relationship is not built upon not only the easy issues in which we can all agree but also the issues in which we disagree. Moreso the latter in fact because if a relationship can weather the disagreements and can retain a mutual respect and an appreciation of the worth of both parties to it, then that adds even greater strength to the bond.
Unfortunately in this country, we have a “disposable society” where marriages fail due to one or both parties’ apathy and unwillingness to overcome issues for the greater benefit. We need to overturn this mentality in our society and create one which does not promote such ease of disposal but create far greater appreciation between couples, within families and a good place to start is within this forum.
There just isn’t any need for personal insults Cheesy. We’re trying to achieve a world of empathy and understanding aren’t we? Isn’t that the true end goal?
I have every capability of pouring derision on people. Slice and dice as we’d say. But that is precisely what we’re trying to overcome. Our society has stooped to too low a level and it has been supported, if not promoted, by a series of governments now over decades, to introduce more and more of a “me myself I” society.
It doesn’t work and never will and never should have.
Mr Welsh, I couldn’t have said that any better!
If people cannot understand it, and my other comments today, then there is no hope.
We need to stay out of the box.
regards
Mark
Hey guys,
Agreed. We ALL need to stop fighting. That’s what’ll kill us before we start.
I’m so unbelievably glad that people really are starting to wake up, I was losing hope.
Now I see that England is waking up it really helps. I try talking to my friends about this, I post them daily newspaper articles completely highlighting the Big Brother society that is being ushered in, and they just smile like Im slightly crazy and say ‘yes, that’s a bit odd, but that’s just politicians.’
Thank god other people are listening.
And I dont even believe in god. But I do believe in freedom and respect, and that’s being eroded daily in this country.
Murdoch ( yes Roopey ) has said or let slip, in an interview, that the days of the internet are numbered. He is close to the Elite, so maybe he’s not talking sphericals.
Wiggins,
I was just about to add to my previous comment that yes, the internet is going down. Be aware that it has reached the extent where we are probably right now being monitored and tracked. Personally I dont care right now, I havent done anything wrong so I have nothing to fear. And if it does come to an awful conclusion, well I’d rather go down with knowledge than go down like a slaughtered lamb.
A new website has sprung up to cater for the information that Youtube/Google seeks to censor – check out http://www.infowarstv.com
Mr Gore under the spotlight more and more it seems!
Cap-And-Trade: Al Gore’s Cash Cow
By INVESTOR’S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Wednesday, April 29, 2009 4:20 PM PT
Global Warming: At the cap-and-trade hearings, it was revealed that not everyone will suffer from this growth-killing energy tax. A congresswoman wanted to know why sea levels aren’t rising but Gore’s bank account is.
When Gore left office in January 2001, he was said to have a net worth in the neighborhood of $2 million. A mere eight years later, estimates are that he is now worth about $100 million. It seems it’s easy being green, at least for some.
Gore has his lectures and speeches, his books, a hit movie and Oscar, and a Nobel Prize. But Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., was curious about how a man dedicated to saving the planet could get so wealthy so quickly. She sought out investment advice we all could use in a shaky economy.
Last May, we noted that Big Al had joined the venture capital group Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers the previous September. On May 1, 2008, the firm announced a $500 million investment in maturing green technology firms called the Green Growth Fund.
Last Friday, Gore was the star witness at the hearings on cap-and- trade legislation before the House Energy and Commerce Committee. Blackburn asked Gore about Kleiner-Perkins, noting that at last count they “have invested about a billion dollars invested in 40 companies that are going to benefit from cap-and-trade legislation that we are discussing here today.”
Blackburn then asked the $100 million question: “Is that something that you are going to personally benefit from?” Gore gave the stock answer that “the transition to a green economy is good for our economy and good for all of us, and I have invested in it but every penny that I have made I have put right into a nonprofit, the Alliance for Climate Protection, to spread awareness of why we have to take on this challenge.”
Last May, we also noted that on March 1, Gore, while speaking at a conference in Monterey, Calif., admitted to having “a stake” in a number of green investments that he recommended attendees put money in rather than “subprime carbon assets” such as tar sands and shale oil.
He also is co-founder of Generation Investment Management, which sells carbon offsets that allow rich polluters to continue with a clear conscience. It’s a scheme that will make traders of this new commodity rich and Bernie Madoff look like a pickpocket. The other founder is former Goldman Sachs partner David Blood.
As Stephen Milloy, author of “Green Hell,” points out, Goldman Sachs is lobbying for climate change legislation and is part owner of the Chicago Climate Exchange, where carbon credits from cap and trade would be traded.
Others hope to cash in along with Gore. On Earth Day 2007, the various NBC networks gave 75 hours of free air time to Gore to hype climate change. NBC is owned by General Electric, perhaps the largest maker of wind turbines and other green technology in the world. It, too, stands to benefit financially from cap and trade, as Fox News commentator Bill O’Reilly has noted, connecting dots others won’t.
Gore’s altruism is phony. According to a March 6 Bloomberg report, Gore invested $35 million of his own money not in green nonprofits, but with the very profitable Capricorn Investment Group LLC, a Palo Alto, Calif., firm that directs clients to green investments and invests in makers of environmentally friendly products.
As reported on Green Hell Blog, Capricorn was founded by the billionaire former president of eBay Inc., Jeffrey Skoll, who also happens to be an executive producer of Gore’s Oscar-winning documentary, “An Inconvenient Truth.”
Gore has not taken a vow of poverty even as he advocates legislation that will push millions into it. He has said greed and corporate profits are behind the studies disproving his alarmism. Maybe it’s his desire for profits that’s behind his manipulation of the truth.
Sounds like an “inconvenient truth” regarding Mr Gore, from my perspective anyhow!!
Yea, saw the interrogation, Blackburn ripped Gore a new ass, it was great to watch the pompous ass get his balloon popped.
Ps. Don’t mention Ken Laye aka Kenny Boy.
With the dumbing down of the MSM it is truly amazing that so may people have any perspective of the bigger picture at all. Those contributing here are but a small sample of both the awakened and the awakening.
Each and every one of us is a witness to the unfolding of events, and the hammering of the world into a different shape, from our own personalised vantage point. As one who has distanced himself from the evil of TV for many years, as a consequence of the demands of academic study, I have been horrified to see the deliberate manipulation of the ‘herd mentality’. Moving against the prevailing direction of herd travel takes tremendous effort and courage and those at the Column the BCG deserve more encouragement and less criticism in my view.
My lack of active postings here is a reflection of the fact that, as a ‘truth seeker’, I spend considerable time reading posts and following the weblinks. It has been a humbling experience to come to terms with the fact that each of you holds the different jig-saw pieces that build the bigger picture. Disclosing your knowledge extends my knowledge. It is also an unfortunate fact that each of our life experiences shapes our views and the degree of tolerance that we extend to others from different backgrounds.
Some of the articles and posts here have caused me to re-examine and challenge my own belief systems. It has occasionally been uncomfortable but is a natural part of the waking up process. I have steeled myself to be shocked further in future!!!!
In the foreground we see that poison that has been introduced is presently coursing through the veins of the body of world-wide society. It attacks the financial, political, legal, spiritual and social organs of that body. There is no running and hiding from its effects.
In the background the antidote is already being administered.
Just to say i enjoyed your post !
Thank you. Just to elaborate a little more on my present thoughts. Our common enemy is cunningly deceptive. An essential ingredient of the administered poison is the logic trap. Its use enables him to deceive you into believing that what is upside down is really the right way up. Consequently, resistance becomes divided, confused and largely ineffective.
He conceals his primary objective from you by packaging his evil intentions as being for your own benefit / the benefit of society. Without realising it we become herded to the destination of his choosing. Simple yet clinically effective.
Yep, sly aren’t they ! A simple bi polar argument is enough to entrap most, and logic that leads to the elites pre chosen conclusion, which is another step down the path to slavery ! It’s our own ignorance and weakness we are fighting ! Get that sorted and we’ve got a chance !
wow dude,
so glad there are people like you awake. I dont need to post any additions, you said it all.
The homosexual and feminist agendas are both aimed at destroying the nuclear family, the building block of a stable society. Feminism, the Big Lie, is used to con women out of the home and into slavery, thus allowing the state to indoctrinate the children at a younger age.
From ‘freedom of the home’ to ‘chained to the office desk’ – how liberating! Rush hour travel, stress of office work, finding strangers ( childminders ) for the children to imprint on and who may have a different set of values to impregnate the children with, sales targets, job security – then the evening rush hour home, supermarket dash, followed by junk food & housework and very little time for the children! Having the additional job of looking after the home ie. husband and wife have a day job each and then another job maintaining the home. Missing out on their childrens development.
Many feminists, having used the agenda to their advantage are now seeing the effects on their sons ie. suicidal because they are ejected from their homes, childrens lives and forced to pay crippling child support for children they have no rights to parent and as grandparents, they have no access to their grandchildren!
… and having ejected the husband, they have no one to protect them when their children are forcibly adopted in many cases.
Unfortunately, like Pavlovs dogs, the public have been conditioned to accept both feminism and homosexuality as normal and any criticism of either is deemed bigoted, non PC or hate speech by people who are ignorant to the agenda behind them. The people who often insult people by calling them bigots are generally greater bigots and hypocrites too!
Nature gave me the ability to make decisions and choices – it is not up to corrupt, degenerate, self serving politicians to determine my likes or dislikes.
Brian / Editor – You are doing an excellent job and publishing what the controlled media dare not!
Nobody can call me sexist or racist … I hate everybody equally!
Wow, so many good points in here and yet a few that are not.
The comments about freedom are spot on, they want us enslaved. But look at all the under age and teenage mums un fit to look after their own children. Look at the council estates, modern day concentration camps some might say.
This is destroying the family unit more than mothers who go out to work or gay people!
I still cannot believe the level of ignornance though.
Get all this nonsense of labels: feminists, gays, blacks, jews, martians OUT OF YOUR HEAD! We are talking about PEOPLE! Maybe not the Martians lol.
If you cannot see that everybody is the same then you are living in a warped reality. You allow groups like CP to exploit preexisting prejudices in society. These people are not stupid! Once they favour a set group of people, or try and weasle there way in, you will throw your arms up and repent against it. This is exactly what they want. They want us divided, not united.
You can hate everybody equally if you like, I on the other hand respect everybody equally and care for people in the same way. I even respect your comments because thats your perception of the illusion of reality.
That is what is wrong with society today, there is no respect and no accountability.
Welsh_messenger makes some fantastic comments above as well. But if you do not have people ready to constructively criticise, then you become narrow minded and boxed in. This is how they will defeat you.
MM
It is referred to as the New WORLD Order for a reason! There is nowhere in this world untouched by it to go to, anywhere that appears untouched now soon won’t be. For example, Common Purpose is going global.
We all have responsibilities, why else would we all be so concerned? But you don’t protect your loved ones by running away, you have to stand your ground. Surely that is what the UK Column is doing, facing the problems, recognising them and taking action.
Sharon, as far as I am concerned you and Marko/Mark are bang out of order slagging this edition off on its first day of issue. You are either onboard with this movement or you aren’t, that’s it. If all this PC/ Diversity stuff is so precious to you both then why are you here? Actually?
Other people are entitled to their opinions too, and this is mine.
Cheesy,
You’re just not getting it are you? Constructive critcism is NOT “slagging off” as you put it. And you’re still spouting that: you’re either with us or against us (bit like George Bush did in his ‘war on terror’ threat).
I notice Glenn asked you in a post on one of the other topics if you were the sites’ policeman. It seems that way to me too. Go and have a lie down or something. Better still get off everybody’s back who doesn’t agree with you and don’t presume you know better than others. If you notice Mark and I merely put forward suggestions – we did not dictate. That’s clearly your speciality.
Marko
It appears to me that you are suffering a little too much from the “live and let live” mentality.
Unfortunately for us all, there are people now working in society to take your right to “live and let live” and oppose THEIR views and agenda on YOU, and let me tell you that the total suppression of individuality and free speach is number one target in this war on our collective minds.
It is US at the UK Column who are speaking up for the silent majority, the masses of people in this country denied a voice by the corrupt media and establishment, who dare not attack the false doctrines and ideas that underlie the social diseases and decay that we are living through.
The situation has simply gone too far for everyone to just sit around and smoke a peace pipe together and sing John Lennon songs. We can and must now declare TOTAL WAR on those who are attacking us and our society and sustain that war until either we win, and bring our country back under Sovereign Democratic government, where each and all has an ASSURED RIGHT to their views, opinions, and private lifestyles, as long as it harms no-one else, or attempts to propagandize and pervert minors, or we all go down together.
Speaking as a Christian, I know that defeat in this war will mean death as my alleigance to Jesus Christ as saviour means that I could never personally submit to the SATANIC New World Order. For as it is written in the Book of Revelations, we will all be soon asked to “take the mark”, and non Christians will not understand this when the time comes. Thus, the #1 target of the Satanists, is true Christians, who are their mortal enemy, for we know them by their works and are not deceived.
If you don’t have the stomach for this war, you might find our paper a little unfomfortable in some areas, but as other posters have said here “the truth hurts”.
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”
- Ephesians 6:12
What’s the plan then John?
John you are missing the point!
I cant possibly try and explain this again. I get it, Sharon gets it, Mark Welsh gets it. If you dont get what I am saying then there is nothing more I can do im affraid.
Of course the nWo is satanic. But I would think ,as a Christian, that you would understand what it is that I am saying with regards to respect and love for everyone.
We are all the same. Spirit, eternal life and infinite conciousness! This is regardless of age, sex, sexuality, race etc.
I actual give up in trying to point out the issues I had with a couple of articles, not with the paper!
I wish people would read before they make fleeting remarks.
I am sorry, I am not having a specific ‘go’ at you. I am just annoyed that people are making assumptions.
Sharon: See http://www.thebcgroup.org.uk/
Marko: There are two reasons why you shouldn’t get annoyed:
1. What’s the point?
2. While we are all on the same side, we all have different viewpoints of the written word. Its hard enough to make a point to people you know well this way, never mind people you have never met.
For example, you thanked Brian for his considered response. But of course his response came after our interchange, so he had the benefit of that, while I was sitting here screaming to myself: No! That’s not what I meant to have happen!
That’s one reason why I think it is so important that people come to the June conference. That’s also one reason why we are setting the BC Group up as a group of groups. To try and minimise this kind of thing. Its too easy for misunderstanding in these kinds of discussions. We all do it, and that just the way it is until we have been posting for a long time and learn each others styles. Its much less likely to happen when you meet people face to face.
I have been seriously looking at how we can take these conversations off text and onto voice and video. The main problem is one of control, I think, and how to give everyone a fair crack.
So if anyone have any views on how that could be made to work, please email me.
It’s not really being annoyed. Its more frustration that people aren’t seeing the reasons for pointing it out. Others will become so defensive because they haven’t read what has been posted and assume people like me and Sharon are out to judge them or the newspaper, when its completely the opposite and we want it to succeed in a way that everyone can feel welcomed and comfortable.
You’re right, we are on the same side. You are also spot on that this wouldn’t happen in face to face environment.
Perhaps set up local groups?
Not to side track, but its amazing watching a show like, come dine with me. They stick these people together from different wealths, ages, cultures, beliefs and in many occassion they enlighten each other and generate an understanding. Of course some people bitch and moan, but those are the ones only interested in winning.
When I go to talks hosted by John Harris, its such an open and relaxed atmosphere, as I am sure the conference in June will be.
Along with local groups you could try a pod cast? A sort of question and anwser session? A radio show?
I am not sure of the practicalities of these however.
We ran a radio show pilot a couple of weeks ago to an invited audience. We are very keen to do this again – the main problems still to be resolved are twofold:
1. How to queue up phone calls from listeners.
2. How to stream it out in a format people can use without hassle.
The setup we used is as follows:
I have an Asterisk server at home. Brian called into a conference call hosted on there. We streamed the conference to an internet radio server and people could listen. However, because Asterisk is open source, and mp3 is a licenced format, Asterisk only supports streaming as ogg vorbis, rather than mp3. So people were reluctant to install vlc or some other software just to listen to the show.
The Asterisk server takes voip connections from several voip providers, so that I can take calls from pstn land. But I am restricted to a couple of voice channels per telephone number, so how do I queue up calls?
(I can also mix in calls from Skype.)
These are the issues still to be solved. If anyone has advice about this, let us know. Because it worked quite well otherwise, and I think its a good format.
Sadly, I have no idea about the technical side of things. I do know Skype is great as it’s free and a lot of people have iphones now, which can run it as an application so no internet or pc is required.
You could run it as a pre-recorded segment until you get your head around a live broadcast. People would have to register to be eligable to call in. This could then be done on the basis of either
1. A random draw of names.
2. Pre submitted questions, but that might take away from the ‘live’ feel if you know what questions are coming.
Is there not public access radio, like they have with TV? What about approaching the controversy channel, Sky 200 (Not a cheap plug lol) to see if there is anyway of striking a deal with them? Maybe even a one off question and answe show we put together ourselves?
MM
Hi Skype is not free
I’m sorry chaps but i’ve been picturing the scene at the test broadcast. Was it like this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZFTuR6OZOdM
[quote]Marko
You can hate everybody equally if you like, I on the other hand respect everybody equally and care for people in the same way. I even respect your comments because thats your perception of the illusion of reality.[/quote]
It was a joke! Hence the smiley.
A short refresher for those who do not believe that the New World Order is explicitly SATANIC: http://www.threeworldwars.com/albert-pike.htm
Strange coincidence that the secret (inside) governments throughout the last 3 centuries of European history have always involved the Jesuit Order. Why, today they are virtually dominating the UK mainstream media. From the BBC onwards. I wish your paper every success.
This must be your day. Two replies in a row!
Yes, those long copy and pastes are things I rarely read, and if I do I sample bits of text in the middle somewhere to decide if it is propaganda or not. With propaganda you are supposed to start reading and gradually get more and more brainwashed so that by the middle you will believe black is white. Sample it in the middle first and that puts a stop to it.
Be concise though when posting, a point should rarely take more than a page to describe, although brainwashing is a different matter, as you know.
The Jesuits are the heartbeat of the nwo !
I rarely post here at all and when I do I get little response – but when I have a little poke at a few people who post long piece after long piece, at all hours of the day, nearly every day, you all get so agitated.
How dare I?
I will continue to post my views, thank you.
And I will continue in my belief that there are some on this site with their own agenda.
I like your comments Cheesy, keep posting. It would be a sad world – or a 1984 – type world, if we all thought and held the same views.
Hi cheesy,
That leaves me wondering where i stand with you. If there’s something on your mind get it out there, don’t let it fester !
I’ve got an agenda, it’s to damage the nwo any way i can think of ! I’m not a Christian I’m an ecumenical Gnostic. That means i probably see things a little different to you but it’s a big world and vive la difference eh.
So have you joined the British Constitution Group yet? Set up your local group?
Just asking …
yes
I’ve joined, but not set up a local group. There is not an ice cube’s chance in hell that my usual circle of friends would sign the royalist pledge.
Have you?
Its not about making a club for friends. Its about getting out and speaking to people you have never met before and presenting a case for fighting back.
Besides, its not a royalist pledge. The pledge recognises Royal Assent as a constitutional role. Like it or not, at present we live in a constitutional monarchy. Its about taking back our own sovereignty using our Constitution, and forcing those who have responsibility to do their jobs. You could probably be persuading your friends that that is an effective way of getting to the point where we can decide whether or not to become a Republic. But that’s a discussion for the time when we have our right of self determination back.
The question is, Glenn, will you damage the nwo any way you can think of or not?
I’ve been damaging the nwo any way i could think of for a long time.
I understand the situation with the pledge, and here is where we are so we start from here !
My way of doing things overlaps with yours but isn’t identical. A lot of the people i know won’t use the internet, blue tooth phones, bank accounts, tv’s, they won’t vote or register or meet in numbers ! All over Britain there is an underground that works mouth to ear ! These people need little persuasion of what’s happening, i keep some of them up on the details, word spreads and meets the same word coming from other directions. There’s a lot more happening off the net than on it !
The internet, clubs, groups and meetings is the overground, while it lasts ! It’s good for info sharing but it wont be the be all and end all when push comes to shove.
I continually talk to people i’ve never met before, i’ve just talked the arse of two Jehova’s witnesses, i did a nun last week ! But yes i talk, ive developed different ’scripts’ for different people so i can engage their own interest and then show them how the Zionists have influence there. The England football kit and new Wembley is good for football lads, but tell them about economic mismanagement and they fall asleep !
Sometimes it’s about not saying too much, it may take a second or third person to raise the subject before a person takes notice, so i’ve learned to try to be happy to be first or second and leave the germ of a thought rather than push on and on and push too far.
I want to make things happen that i know will make a difference and that’s how i apportion my time. Where is the B.C. Group going !
“My way of doing things overlaps with yours but isn’t identical.”
Good!
The BC Group is basically about getting some kind of common ground for all the various activist groups out there, including those who are working to sit outside of our screwed up society. We aim to have each of the local groups autonomous, with help from the core. The aim is to have an organisation that can continue the work even if something were to happen to those at the centre.
The idea is that each of the local groups build networks with other local groups. We run local, county and national campaigns. The principles in the pledge are the basis for the common ground that all the groups should share, but we’re not asking people to drop any personal agenda they may have.
We are asking for a small financial commitment from each member, starting at £1 per month, so that we can run the website, publish flyers and pamphlets, pay for conferences, local group meetings and transport to the conferences and so on.
The British Constitution Group will exist for its members, not the other way round. We will not win this war with a small group of agitators, and we really sincerely believe that this is the only approach which will work. We hope to convince one million other of that too. Keep an eye the front page of this site for an article from Roger Hayes on this in the next day or so.
Well thats paranoia mate.
Who cares, so long as you know who you are and what it is you are trying to achievein life. People could think I have an agenda all day until the cows come home. I just call them paranoid and wish them well in their egocentric persuits.
If people are logical and open, they will spot the difference between a trouble maker and a critic looking to better the cause.
Its far too easy to get tunnel vision in this feild and not see the forest for the trees.
MM
This is what tolerance of the homosexual agenda does to society:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5292472/Eight-members-of-paedophile-ring-found-guilty-of-child-porn-and-sex-charges.html
Hi John,
What do you think society should do about homosexuality ?
You also taint this website and the work that’s being done by expressing views like that.
Well done.
You will go far.
OMG!
You are a right ole mug aren’t you.
How many paedos are straight men? How many are women? Go away and do some proper research you fear mongering fool.
I bet you are scared of swine flu as well, walk around wearing a mask and gloves. You probably profess that the Main stream Media are liars and cant be trusted and then spew out this bullshit.
the nWo love easily manipulated people like you, they really do. You help them further their agenda of dividing and conquering.
I actually cannot believe the utter stupidity of someone to come on here and post an article like that and say ‘hey look, they are all the same, look what it does’.
I few gays once crashed there car, does that mean that they are all rubbish drivers as well?
You need a reality check mate.
Marko,
Please stop the personal attacks. I was happy to let your naming me an idiot pass, but I won’t have this kind of abuse here.
JM, just like everyone here, is entitled to express his view. If you wish to debate that view, I welcome that, but please do it without the tirade of personal abuse.
If you can’t do that, then please leave.
OK, perhaps I’ve missed the point here.
He can post, highly offensive remarks saying homosexuals are paedophiles, which is what he is saying in case you didn’t see the link.
But I can’t express my view that he is a fear mongering mug and a fool. Hardly harsh in comparison to the allegations he is making is it?
So it’s a rule for one person and a rule for another person? Someone quoted that ‘The Truth hurts’ and thats the truth of people like him. Its clearly a sweeping judgement he has made, probably intentionally I might add.
Come on. See the double standards here. That language was very tame compared to what I really think of people like him.
MM
That’s not what he said.
There is no double standard here.
You can state your case that his view is wrong. I’m sure you are imaginative enough to do that without attacking him personally.
I already made my position clear on the issue of “offence,” by the way.
The rule is quite simple really. If you are unable to argue a point without heckling the person making the point, then please leave.
Ok, this isn’t our debate and it’s side tracking us both.
But why sit and state a case in a softly, softly way to someone who is making a harsh allegation. It’s clear as day that he is making this link. Anyone who sits back and lets it slide because they’re not gay, or they dont know for a fact that all paedos are not, is a very selfish person indeed. That helped in Nazi Germany!
If I came on here and said ’see this is what *insert non white race* does to society’, and then proceeded to link to a story of some *non white person* murdering a child. This would be ok, even though I was making a serious racist allegation and many of the people who read the column and take part who are of this race, would be offended and perhaps worried about where it might go?
I will defend any group of people that is being wrongfully targeted, and although you might not see it this way, I am defending the repuation of this group as well.
I’m not asking you to be soft in your approach. Just not personal. Apart from anything else, it doesn’t help your position.
JM referred to an agenda. He did not say “see what homosexuals do to society.”
Finally, Marko, can i just ask, why do you see it as your role to defend the reputation of this group?
Mate, it’s of any group. (not sure if you mean gay or the column!)
I did, and still do, the exact same thing for anyone who makes remarks about the Muslim community because the MSM tried so hard to paint them all as insane suicidal terrorists. This normally surprises people being white as ghost and covered in tattoos mind you!
There are too many people who dont speak up, especially in the various circles of groups that do get targeted, and this is not their fault as it can leave them open to further abuse. However and ‘outsider’, for lack of a better word, can have a bigger impact in many instances.
Marko
The homosexual agenda is not the same thing as “homosexuals”, so lets not play silly games with language.
I know and have known a number of gay people who do not engage in the kind of disgusting activities that some of the more vocal “homosexual activists” seem to enjoy as highlighted by this article, which by the way, is not the first time this type of thing has been brought to light.
The point here is that we are dealing with a very aggressive and vocal minority of sick people who should not be tolerated in society, since they are criminals, and I would venture one step further in calling them EVIL, because this is what they clearly are.
Overall, my point is that people like you and your constant bleating about “tolerance” and “respect”, are not helping fix societies problems one bit, so you should really take a good look in the mirror and think before you speak in future.
Freedom of speech is about freedom to be INTOLERANT, especially of views and behavior that are clearly wrong and destructive to civilized society. And let me tell you, I am VERY intolerant of people who want to impose a homosexual agenda on CHILDREN.
If you are suggesting that you disagree with that, then I think you should have a good hard think about what you are doing on this site, and reading our paper.
John I agree, my first thought was that a ‘gay agenda’ is not the same as ‘gayness’ in and of itself. I have no problem with a loving same sex couple and what they do in private is none of my business so long as its between consenting adults. However, what I do have a problem with is the actively pro-gay politically correct agenda which is literally rammed down our throats (sorry no pun intended!) it might not be ‘politically correct’ to say this but I don’t believe that same-sex couples should be considered the same as a married heterosexual couple, and I don’t think that children should be taught homosexuality in schools. I just think that when discussing issues of homosexuality theres a fine line between personal gay-ness and political gay-ness if that makes any sense. I’m not gay by the way, but I do have friends who are.
As long as they don’t do it in the streets and frighten the horses it’s o k with me !
There certainly shouldn’t be any agenda of this or any other kind on children. Once kids grow up and reach high school and then develop through puberty, they know which preference that they have. They certainly dont need to be taught it, or confused by it and I know it goes on in schools and I agree that it is wrong.
But please see the side that you made the comment and posted that link and it light of the discussions made above it, it didn’t look sinister in anyway at all?
I do find that very hard to believe.
However, as you have now elaborated on why you posted the link, it makes sense. But i feel it’s important to not leave things to interpretation, especially considering the debate that went on previous to it.
I hope that makes sense, and apologies for thinking otherwise of you. But I hope you can see where I am coming from?
MM
The endgame agenda of the NWO.
No family unit,the state will bring up the children.The teaching of homosexuality to 4 year
olds is indocrination.
We as a family have gay friends,even they are opposed to the sex education teachings.
We see adolessant boys becoming more effeminate,this is the mark of satan,when the
depopulation agenda is complete and tptb have their one billion controlled population
women will be used as breeding stock,the whole of humanity will be bi-sexual or
homosexual,this is being forced onto our young innocent children so to confuse them of
there sexuallity.
This is not an attack on gay men and women it’s an attack on humanity.
The UK column is merely bringing this to the publics attention.
One of the aims of tptb is division of race,religion,class and sexuality.
If we fail and the NWO win hetrosexuality will no longer exist,can it be right to turn a
straight person gay,or vice versa,no it is not,we are born what we are.
Now that is very well put.
I am pretty sure it helps with the depopulation excerise they are running as well.
But I have to say, how are they going to make people gay or lesbian? It’s not something that is taught. Sure, it will really confuse children and this is WRONG and they will have issues as a result, but at the end of the day you are going to be attracted to the sex that you like. I can see a downside in people becoming very violent or twisted.
They might have ways of hypnotising them into it, it’s certainly not that far fetched.
They might have god knows what in the foods and vaccinations that make the boys more effeminate.
Its a genuis plan I must say. I can see how they do it with religion and screaming anti-semite at people who speak out at anything deemed to be against jews. I can see how they do it with sexuality.
They will also pass these stupid laws on hate crimes and mention paedos and gays in the same breath, this is a big part of their genuis as it sends out the conflicting messgage.
either way, they are not going to win. Too many people are starting to wake up, and the revolt against the swine flu is just the start.
But once the sheeple begin to awake, they will hit us with an another false flag, or a bigger bio-attack in the form of a really deadly virus.
Its basically a game of chess.
Thank you marko,
Of course these children will have issues,how confused will they become in trying fight what they feel inside.
most adolesant teens go through a stage of confusion over their sexuallity,but they work it out for themselves in the end,it’s just not disscused enough.
What worries me is these brainwashed children will end up suicidal
and carry it through.
A game of chess is a good anolgy and we the population are the pawns.
I agree people are beginning to wake up,tptb are moving swiftly now the agenda is becoming cleare even to the fastidious non beleiver.
There is suggestions that boys will now receive the cervical cancer vaccinne
that is being forced on our daughters.
What the hell is in the vaccinne that can possibly be of any use to young boys
As wre aware the two sexes have different hormones.
I heard it suggested that it’s possibly to make the girls sterile,perhaps thats the reasoning for wanting to give it to boys too.
Either way my concerns are the vaccinne itself,are they being pumped full of hormones too?.
The faster they move things along the more mistakes they will make,you have to have a good memory to be a liar.
I have been heartened at reading comments on the news sites from time to time,people are not believing what they are being fed any longer.
They have threatened a pandemic for a few years now,the pig flu is a false flag,remember the boy who cried wolf one too many times.
The more of us that awaken the more danger we are in,the next bio attack will be for real,will they be believed by those still being herded?.
I must just add the UK column is a must read,i for one salute the whole team in their hard work to get this out to the people,despite all threats they have been up against,Brian and the people that volunteer are a special kind.
Anytime!
I like the way that you think and the way that you put facts and information together, all of which I agree with.
I read about the cervical jab for boys. It’s a mine field trying to keep up with the swines and there little schemes.
the problem for them though, is that they are rushing things now and making far too many mistakes. They know if they got shot of the internet, or regulated it, they would have complete and utter control. It’s coming! But they are scared. they can play their war games and simluations as to how we will react, but it will be worse than they think.
Forget sharing information, far too many people will lose their easy porn fix! This is sad but true. and thats only one major area they would effect and piss off.
We have interesting times ahead. I wait for the 9th Sep to pass, 9-9-9, because they LOVE the symbolism.
There Seems to be something new everyday to read up on,staying ahead of them is a major step for us.
We are fortunate to have the internet to source information and yes that frightens them.
My only concern with the internet is the way the younger generation use to socialise,facebook, bebo and so on.
We also have history as a reference so we can see this taking shape step by step.This has been planned for many many years. We also know how it failed.
When they bring in internet 2 all alternative websites will not be accessable so i save any
information i can,talking to each other face to face again can only be a good step.
We may not be privvy to what they have planned on a daily basis,the information we have gleaned is enough to know.
I would like to believe this could be won peacefully,that is diminishing very quickly
Yes losing their porn will upset many users,once this happens it may just wake them up.
Symbolism plays a very important role,i also await 9-9-9,another false flagwill happen soon,especially if we refuse the ID cards.
It will convince the public we need them to protect us,at the moment that argument is not holding water any longer.
Wow, this is the first time ive ever looked here (on a link from another site) and Im just so heartened to finally see some people with intelligence discussing these issues. I wish we would stop fighting though, and bringing anything other than the TRUTH into this, as its extremely counterproductive. Having read Markos comments I can see why The Editor is asking him to steer away from personal attacks, but I can also see Markos point and its very reassuring that there are people who are able to communicate with his clarity. Compared to the horrific anti-everyone comments Iv been forced to wade through on certain sites this is very refreshing.
The NWO have a singular goal.
We too have a singular goal, to STOP them.
Let’s focus on that.
Very good question Glenn.
I personally think Homosexuality is an abomination and a grave sin. However, leaving leaving the religious and/or moral question/issue to one side, let’s look at the obvious biological issue which centres on How would we have reached the 21Century if Homosexuality was the ‘norm’?
The mass mudering Jewish Bolshevik Lenin stated “Destroy the family and you destroy society”.
The family unit is the backbone of society. In order to usher in their Satanic godless and self-worshipping materialistic world order the family structure along with religion, race and patriotism need to be attacked, undermined and ultimately destroyed. The (false)Jew’s like the Rothschilds know this and are employing and utilising many diabolical and disturbing weapons to carry out this twisted agenda.
In order to destroy the family and society the gay and Homosexual agenda is being ruthlessly promoted (also helps in their Malthusian depopulation agenda). So is abortion, hardcore pornography, promiscuity, binge drinking, feminism, one parent families, divorce, co-habitation, drug taking, lack of responsibility for actions and a whole host of other diabolical and nefarious concepts.
Henry Makow has an excellent book on this whole diabolical approach. It’s called Cruel Hoax – Femimism and The New World Order:-
“Feminism, our official gender ideology, masquerades as a movement for women’s rights. In reality, feminism is a cruel hoax, telling women their natural biological instincts are “socially constructed” to oppress them.
Feminism is elite social engineering designed to destroy gender identity, making women masculine and men feminine. Increasingly heterosexuals are being conditioned to behave like homosexuals who generally don’t marry and have children. Thus courtship and monogamy are being replaced by sexual promiscuity, prophesied in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
The Rockefellers and Rothschilds created feminism to weaken the family and poison male-female relations (divide and conquer.) Their twin objectives are depopulation and totalitarian world government. Why? These bankers create money out of nothing and think they are God.
“Cruel Hoax” shows the connection between feminism, Communism and 9-11. It examines male-female relations and shows how we can take back our heterosexuality.”
Well I wont even begin to take that first line apart. Some people just dont care so long as it’s not them being effected, or if it’s not them who are the very things they claim to be against.
Seriously. Why cant people see that if members who promote the UK Column walk around saying completely rediculous comments like that, others will avoid it with a barge pole and even rebel against it. It will give it a bad name and reputation, unless that is the general view? I dont know, im certainly not going to assume that. If it’s not the general view then for the life of me I cannot understand why remarks like it go unchecked.
This is logical and it is dangerous to the cause, very! Yet, these remarks go unchecked? I am not even going to begin to enter into this ’say whatever you like about anything but just dont insult the person saying it’ routine.
Its insane!
glenn I fully understand where you are coming from, but I cant understand how you can think in that logical way and then thank this guy when his first line is that.
If you look into it more you’ll find out that it’s just the way people are born. Whatever reasons are behind that, I dont know. But it doesnt just occur in humanity, it occurs all over the animal kingdom. But then people will debate we are not animals, we are better than that, and there in lies the problem.
ALL LIFE is equal. I wont debate shooting an elephant over a member of my family scenarios because thats when it gets into a very grey area due the society thats been created for us. I am very sure that God, whoever that might be, certainly did not want the Planet to end up the way that it is
If people cannot see that everyone is the same, then there is literally no hope. In an nWo depopulation program bringing the number of people down to 500k on this planet, they wont give a hoot how many gay people die. We are all in the same boat and it hasn’t quite sunk yet.
Hi Marko,
I thanked Crush for his honest opinion and i thank you for yours !
Divisions aren’t good, but getting honest opinions out in the open is good, there has to be dialogue before understanding . I don’t spend any time thinking about other peoples sexuality, the only important thing to me in all this is protecting vulnerable children from pedophiles and from being taught homosexuality. If someone is by nature gay, sound, that’s up to them in their bedroom !
Nine years ago one of my Sons came home from junior school with a religious education folder. On the cover were symbols of all Eastern and Western religions. There was also a Dove, which has a front meaning of the dove of peace, its occult meaning is as the Symbol of Semiramis the whore queen of Babylon. There was also a pair of hands locked in Masonic handshake ! The kids are being messed with in a number of ways and that puts heckles up !
One of my Sons attends a school in Derby whose outdoor play area is an uncapped pyramid with an eye above it made of a traffic turnaround. The entrance is a replica of the portico of Solomon’s Temple and the whole place is built on Freemason principles ! None of this is declared but the hidden agenda becomes clear when the symbolism is understood.
This school is Patronised by two senior Freemasons and partially funded by Rolls Royce. That’s the same RR who give secure office space to Common Purpose in their Sinfin Lane works here. Everything they teach is suspect as far as I’m concerned. What they are doing needs to be examined and exposed, I know it’s hard if you feel it is personally directed at you but you’re a tough guy so you can stay and make your case can’t you !
Agreed
Thanks for that Crush.
I’ve never been sure whether homosexuality is genetic or learned,nature or nurture ?
I think if i knew that i would then know what to think of it ! I wouldn’t want to condemn a person for their nature.
Having said that i think the heterosexual, man works woman stays at home to bring the children up properly family model is the backbone of the success that western society has enjoyed, and that is being attacked !
The minimum wage has become the average wage, ensuring both partners have to work to fund the home, leaving kids doing what ?
I’ve been a Henry Makow fan for a long time, anyone interested in the subject of feminism and social manipulation might enjoy his site:
http://www.savethemales.ca/
I’m no expert on Homosexuality. However, even though I don’t approve of it for religious reasons, it’s the ruthless promotion of its agenda that’s the worrying part. What I do know is the water supply and various plastic bottled drinks contain various gender bending chemicals.
Let children be children you sick diabolical scumbags. Five year olds shouldn’t be taught about any kind of sex whether that be heterosexual or homosexual. They haven’t even developed a immune system at that age let alone the emotional capabilities to deal with such complexities.
For example, I could be arrested for committing a homophobic hate crime for the above statement. This is the were the whole farce kicks in. In the court I would swear on The Bible to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. The very same book that states within it that Homosexuality is a sin and against Christian teachings!!! Also, if I’m committing a homophobic hate crime for disgareeing with Homosexuality by the same token they are committing a hate crime against my Christian beliefs, Christophobia. You can’t have it both ways. Political correctness etc. forces the majority to fit in with the minority, not the other way around which as we all know is nigh on impossible.
As with all these diabolical and nefarious concepts they have all been planned towards a set agenda. I don’t think anyone can dispute the direct correlation between family breakdown and the continuing attack on the family unit and the the breakdown of society.as a whole.
People are awlays saying teenagers are out of control and committting heinous crimes etc. – they are. However, society was completely out of control before any of the present day teenagers were even born. Let children and teenagers get completely out of control – both parents forced to work to keep a roof over their heads and parental discipline removed, violent and sick comouter games etc. React to this pre-planned and organised chaos and pandemonium by fingerprinting children, introducing curfews, installing Police and social workers at schools – sorry I meant state indoctrination centres, club bouncers at schools, CCTV in classrooms and toilets, metal detectors in schoolyards and last but not least the Armed Forces to take control of classrooms!!!!!
If this wasn’t so damned serious I would be laughing my head off. Unfortuntaely, it isn’t and its getting worse every day.
OK, i see a bit more into your way of thinking here.
You make some very valid points about they way they are trying to corrupt our children. Gender bending chemicals? Hmmm, not so sure about that one. Maybe the chemtrails are part of this.
I dont see why you can speak in such an open way regarding what is going on but have such a harsh view of gay people just because it’s in the bible!
Really, I seriously doubt that Jesus or any god, would condem people who are in love. Dont forget that heterosexuals perform the same acts with their partners.
there are too many contradictions. Seek the truth yourself, use the bible as a good reference point, but dont let it shape your life if it is not in a positive loving way of other people.
Its hypocritical not to.
With respect Marko, heterosexuals do NOT perform the same acts as homosexuals !.
Heterosexuals indulge in sexual intercourse, whereas homosexuals indulge in, what is still known, as perversion.
Without going into detail there is a huge physiological difference between the two acts.
Because society has been brainwashed into accepting homosexuality as being normal, this is not, of course, the case.
This does not mean I wish to make the act illegal, again, but one must accept that tolerance is not necessarily acceptance.
Quote: John Morton
This is what tolerance of the homosexual agenda does to society:
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/5292472/Eight-members-of-paedophile-ring-found-guilty-of-child-porn-and-sex-charges.html
Well said. You know it reminds be of a song called ‘If you tolerate this your children will be next’. Did they really mean it that literally?
All should read the following as this is not an academic debate, it is happening RIGHT NOW:
http://www.ccfon.org/view.php?id=733
Whatever your views on this topic, religious, ethical, political or otherwise, it is an absolute and incontravertible plank of a free and democratic society to be allowed to express our opinions and views on any topic.
HOW DARE THESE PEDOPHILES TELL US WHAT WE CAN AND CANNOT SAY ABOUT THEIR DISGUSTING AND EVIL PERVERSIONS?
I say we escalate and bring back the death penalty for people who do this kind of thing. That might focus some minds.
Children are sacrosanct! They should NEVER be brain-washed, either by religions or by politicians.
The extremists such as NuLabour, communism, fascism, marxism etc. ALL want to inflict their ideology on us and our children. With nearly 2 million unmarried mothers, with no fathers, all on Benefit, some 5 million or more on unemployment, with more to follow and the rest on Sickness Benefit, I’d say this country is in a real mess.
NuLabour intend brainwashing our children in primary schools, in the art and instruction of ALL TYPES OF SEX. Jim Knight, the so-called Education Minister, fervently believes this is the right thing to do. I pointed out that certain forms of sex, i.e. teaching children about homosexuality, is not education but exposure to perversion. God knows where this will all end up.
Tolerance is one thing – evil brainwashing of our young is totally another.
Comments on a postcard !
I’m seeing a trend in views here…. hmmmm
PLEASE NOTE: I WILL BE A CANDIDATE IN MY LOCAL BY-ELECTION ON THE 18TH JUNE , AS AN ACTIVIST FOR UKIP AND THE UK COLUMN , PLEASE PASS ON TO FREINDS IN SCOTLAND , GOD BLESS
I’m confused about these by-elections next month – I thought there was some sort of election on the 4th? Is the 4th and the 18th for different things? I want to vote UKIP but I am worried that I won’t know how or where or what day to vote!
Liz why vote for any political party, as once they are voted in they are once again got at by the very manipulaters that we are trying to get rid of, Political parties do not work and from what I have seen of UKIP i certainly would not be impressed by another face of Consevatism
LIZ,
The European (Parliamentary) Elections, are on the 4th. June.
Ignore APByrne, he has an axe to grind !
Good luck Peter !
Peter, when you have a minute, drop me an email at sickofit45@live.co.uk. Thanks. If you’d like to exchange contact details.
Tom
When you talk about the benefits system, the thing that not a lot of people say about it is that it’s not so much a matter of people don’t want to work and make something of themselves, it is more a case that in our socialist system there are two types of people. The working people are deemed fit to have a job because they have been brainwashed sufficiently and will be well-versed in the Marxist political correctness.
Often one of the qualifications to be on the worker list is to not exhibit signs of too much intelligence. Intelligence is a negative characteristic regarding suitability as a government worker. Freethinking tends to go hand in hand with intelligence and resistance to brainwashing, and again, one must never show signs of free thought at a government job if they want to rise above the status of toilet cleaner.
This situation has got so bad now that it is building an underclass. They might be short of cash, but tough times just toughens them up, and they get stronger each year. The other class, the workers, are being brainwashed in their jobs to such a degree that they loose track of reality. Look at some statistics and you will find a large proportion of people can’t even do simple things for themselves like change the oil in their car.
The government always tries to lay the blame when their banker dictated policies brings this country to its knees, of course it’s all down to those people claiming £50 per week. However, looking at the level of government expenditure it is clear the cost of quangos, probably about £200 billion per year, dwarfs any social security costs. I think sickness benefit is about £12 billion or there abouts, to put it into perspective. Naturally doing a made-up job is more expensive by a long stretch than not doing any work at all. However, not working is very damaging to someone in the mental sense and so a lot of those people use their time to be productive, but outside of the financial system, they have alternative means of exchange, e.g. I’ll fix your car if you fix my washing machine. No money spent, no money earned and yet both jobs are done and the taxman does not get a look in. It keeps the British spirit of free enterprise alive and well, albeit rather hidden from view. One day it will be essential to help rebuild our country.
There is only one game in town at the moment. Here it is:
“The UK Independence Party could topple Gordon Brown by beating Labour into fourth place in next month’s Euro elections, says leader Nigel Farage. ”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8040168.stm
All signs are looking excellent; it’s now or never.
If you want to sit there and tell me that he can make comments like that, then you are just as bad for allowing it.
So answer me, are you? Are you allowing someone to spread hatred, because thats what it is that he is doing.
Are you?
Banning? more like silencing!
Probably off-topic but I’ll put a few comments here.
NWO, Common Law, Commercial Law
The NWO is more of an evolutionary process, where over the past several decades, and possibly since the time of Marx, the systems of law pretty much everywhere have been moved to convert them into compatibility with the NWO.
Finding out how far along a country is into the ‘NWO’ is probably just checking how far its law system has moved from Common Law to Commercial Law/Admiralty Law. I imagine that much of recent UK law is firmly under the aegis of Admiralty and Commercial Law. I had always though that laws were created as an “earner” for the govt, and this would clinch it if true.
As has been stated elsewhere in order to ’stop’ the NWO the systems that comprise the legal and judicial underpinnings of civilized society have to be moved back to Common Law in Letter and in Spirit.
If people were educated in basic legal concepts, much of what goes on in the system would not be tolerated as too many people would see the game for what it was.
BTW, I have found a wealth of useful stuff (hundreds of podcasts) on matters such as Common Law on the website:
http://www.georgegordon.org
George Gordon’s approach is Biblical, and his style takes a little getting used to, but he covers all manner of subjects. He often compares the ‘Ten Planks Of The Communist Manifesto’ with ‘The Ten Commandments’. His assertions on Communism seem to me to ring true, we are already living in a Communized world in the West.
He covers legal aspects in getting out of the system, which in the States means a legal status change so drastic that one opts out of taxes, social security, etc. One then lives under Common Law, trading -not- buying/selling which would be under Commerce Law and thence regulated and taxed. He is not a tax protestor. One wonders whether anyone in Europe or the UK has ever ‘opted out’ of the system, and yet survived and made a living in such a way!
No to Internet 2, Yes to Netsukuku…
Someone mentioned Internet 2. What could happen instead is that people set up an informal ‘internet’ based on peer to peer networking. There may be wireless technologies available either now or soon such as WiMax that have a range of 1 km
or more. Once this happens, at least in cities and towns an adhoc hetwork could be
created with thousands of nodes. Check out ‘mesh networks’ and programs/protocols such as ‘netsukuku’ to see the possibilities.
Hi just thought I would let all know of the following and hope I get your comments on the following
“Queen Elizabeth II is the largest landowner on Earth”
the Queen as head of state of the United Kingdom and of 31 other states and territories, is the legal owner of about 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the earth’s non ocean surface, She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries, and who owns countries that are not her own domestic territory. this land ownership is seperate from her role as head of state and is different from other monarchies where no such claim is made – Norway, Belgium, Denmark etc.
The value of her land holding £17,600,000,000,000 (aprox).
this makes her the richest individual on earth,
And we still pay her; my head is in my hands, I wish you hadn’t told me that !
AP: Where can I find the solid facts which support this?
Well you got our comments AP but where’s the proof as requested?
Where can i order this newspaper from ? also cost .
Thanks
John their is no cost for the newspaper, it depends on the following, do you need just 1 paper or many, to show one appreciation you need to donate a few poud to the UK COLUMN, Contact number 01752 312743 email editor@ukcolumn.org
UK Column May ’09.
Page 6 headline
… ‘do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.’
Motto of Aleister Crowley – the wickedest man in the world. How appropriate!
The latest edition of The UK Column is the most startling so far, each page seems to contain information more disturbing than the others, the articles concerning children are particularly hard to take,
‘..project “Caressing”; an initiative which encourages touching between adults and children,’ and
‘Meanwhile we ask if our children are safe in the hands of corrupt and solacious MPs promoting pornographic movies at public expense, privately run Academy schools and project “Caressing”.’
Creepy, or what?
On page 13, Academy Schools are investigated, ‘Project Caressing’ again!
And, ‘What would it take to teach queerly?” Huh?!
Page 9, on the anniversary of poor Maddy McCann’s disappearance, presents a different viewpoint to the mainsteam. Then my eyes are drawn back again to the advert on page 13, ‘Our vanishing birds. Are mobile phones to blame?’
An undulating ribbon of migrating wild geese flew high above me the day before yesterday, there must have been about 200 of them, calling to each other. An awe inspiring sight! Another flock of about 100 flew across yesterday and I found myself worrying about them and hoping they’ll be alright.
It seems everything innocent, honest and good in this world is under attack these days.
I can’t wait for the Conference in June.
Believe me B C Group – you have my full attention!
the 4 major lab tory, lib, green were at the top table trying to tell how wonderfull we will all be being members in there big marrage of nations called the eu, i asked the allan smith SNP , WHAT ABOUT THE EU LAW AGENDER TO HAVE ALL NEW BORN BABYS MICRO CHIPPED …. he looked amazed at my question , ? making some silly comment with a smirk in his face ? ….then i asked him if he could prove his statement that we are not lied to regarding the EU TREATY? IAM STILL AWAITING AN ANSWER TO BOTH MY QUESTIONS? THIS WAS AT CALADONIAN UNIVERSITY HUSTING LAST NIGHT? …THEY KNOW THERE ARE NO PLACE FOR THEM TO HIDE NOW ,,,,AND THERE BIG CON OVER THE EU IS WELL AND TRUELY UP? ROLL ON THE 4TH JUNE ,,,VOTE UKIP
Peter, can you point me in the direction of where that EU law is suggested?
Once again l would particularly like to thank the editor for the marvellous front
page cover with Gordon Brown goose stepping across the uk ,terrific stuff and a
truely powerful sublimable message there.The front page wording Battle for Britain also
very powerful key words.Excellent job.They seem to get better everytime.
See you all at the BCG conference
Tim.
Have you noticed how all the media have been allowed to enthusiastically attack MPs and their cheating on expenses? And well they might, you could say. But as we know that Parliament will cease to have any actual power after next year, this is just the sort of coverage the elite want.
The public will just say of Parliament’s demise; ‘Well, good riddance!’ instead of standing up to defend their sovereignty..
Oh so correct Ruth! Just a little more thought …not much, just a little…. and an open mind and willingness to look and do just a little research and people would not fall for this.
It doesn’t take much. Just instead of zoning out on the couch every damned night staring at that TV, take a little time to understand the world we live in and what is behind all of one’s moans and groans. Just ask yourself why and try to look for the answers. They’re all there to be found.
Just a note on the chemtrails article, I live in Glenrothes, Scotland and work in Edinburgh. I have seen chemtrails most months as many large planes fly across the sky leaving a thick white trail which within an hour has become very broad and eventually causes a haze across the sky, even on the clearest of days.
The first time I saw it I was at Balbirnie Park in Markinch (just down from Glenrothes) when there were dozens of these large (about the size of a commercial jet, white or at least blends into white and very difficult to spot at the front of a trail unless they are low).
Anyway these planes were crossing trails creating a mesh in the sky, one even went along leaving no trail at all then it reached a point in the sky and then began leaving this thick trail. I don’t know what it is they are spraying but it is worrying as it is certainly not tests, it is widespread and worldwide and they are definitely spraying as they sometimes leave no trail then begin, start and stop and so on so it is the controlled release of something. I will get pictures of it next time.
What is strange though is the only other than that I see a plane is small hobby planes like small ones from Fife airport where they teach people and maybe an occasional military jet from luchars but those a rare and the sky is usually empty (it is also interesting to see when I am in edinburgh planes landing leaving no trail or at high altitude a trail that is thin and dissapears in 10 seconds. These planes fly low, maybe 3000-10000 feet as they are quite visible and leave thick trails.
Excellent. We need to unite. Long live Alex Jones and Infowars.com
Mercian Watcher
Could I have a chat with you? Email me at richy_landry@hotmail.com if you could regarding commercial laws etc, hopefully we can catch up on this subject as soon as possible. Commerical processes are being ignored in the UK and steamrollered by courts, it seems things are changing somewhat
Cheers
UK GCSE Test Paper: Current Affairs, Paper One. (2009)
Time allowed: About three years.
( All candidates must finish what they are doing by 2012)
(Note: Candidates failing to answer all the questions within the time allowed will be forced to spend their entire lives in a fascist prison society without hope of remission).
Engage what tiny amount of brain you have and think, if you can.
Question 1: (20 marks)
The “war on terror” has caused how many deaths in Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Pakistan? Discuss.
(OK these people are rag-heads and want to kill all of us , right? So it doesn’t matter if we kill lots of them, right? Anyway, they started it, right?)
Advice to candidates:
Before answering question 1 ensure you have a good grasp of the figures involved and be prepared to argue that one white person killed in New York is worth 1,000 brown babies killed in an A-rab country.
Extra marks will be awarded if you can supplement your written answer with pictures of dead babies in Iraq, Afghanistan or Gaza.
A bonus of 10 points will be given if you can hypothesise a good reason for the invasion of Iran other than the tired old “weapons of mass destruction” excuse.
(Note: If your reason for the invasion of ,or any attack on Iran is a good one , such that the public might believe it, be aware that the copyright to such an idea is ceded to the governments of Israel and the USA without prejudice nor compensation)
Question 2: OK, weed head: Take 50,000 of the world’s best scientists and 5 billion dollars per annum, put them in a room for 20 years and ask them to find a cure for cancer. Do you think they could?
Advice to candidates: Before answering this question, you may wish to consider the profitability disparity between finding a treatment and finding a cure. Candidates should also ignore any “cures” which are cheap and easy to administer, as these are essentially unprofitable. Marks will be deducted for candidates who refer to cannabis oil, sodium bicarbonate, chlorine dioxide or any other proven treatment that is inexpensive.
Question 3:
“ Democracy is a really good thing. Without democracy, we wouldn’t be able to run the world. As far as systems go, democracy is a much easier way to control the herd than fascism or communism. You see, with democracy the idiots think they’re in charge! It really makes us laugh! We make sure that the politicians of all the parties are in our pockets and have their snouts in the trough of greed. We run things, they do as they‘re told. Ha ha ha”
a) To what extent is it true that voters are “the herd” or “the idiots” ?
b) How many people that voted at the last election considered the number of brown babies murdered in the middle east was1) too many. 2) not enough 3) what babies?
Question 4:
Which internationally revered elder statesman and Nobel peace prize winner said:
“ George Bush and Tony Blair enjoyed many moments of ecstasy together. They like to kill, they like to laugh about killing, they like to laugh about how much money they are making from killing, they like to measure their dicks one against the other, they like to do each other in front of a picture of Lucifer. That’s the sort of down-home boys they are, and Obumma ain’t no different”
Was it:
a) HRH the Queen Elizabeth 11?
b) Alex Jones?
c) Olive Farmer?
Olive Farmer: Thank you. That was an entertaining read my friend! LOL 10/10.
Who was it who said, ” Democracy is two wolves and a sheep voting on what is for dinner”?
Talking of the McCann & Madeleine case (Page9) – I have become a little intrigued to say the least & have since learnt that Gerry McCann is/was involved with Common Purpose:
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=58641
But also got interested with this Media Monitoring Unit & came across a link to the full movie:
Clarence Mitchell in his own words, on 29 September 2007 to Espresso: “I was the head of the government’s Media Monitoring Unit. Forty people work there and their function is to control what comes out in the media.”
http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2009/03/clarence-mitchell-mccanns-spokesman.html
And there’s a video there, detailing the story of the Portuguese cop, Goncalo Amaral, who was taken off the case just as soon as he thought he had cracked it.
About 36 minutes in he describes:
“Before I left, someone came to me, I wont say who, with a speech about investigations that don’t end – investigations that don’t end in the way we desire, that do not succeed and that if this investigation was archived or dropped, nobody would question it much or raise any problems about it”
It’s a promotional video for his book, The Truth About A Lie, there’s an English translation due to be published this summer. It’s a shame that the UKColumn’s article on Madeleine is not online:
“Not surprisingly, the McCanns’ lawyers threatened to sue Amaral over his book and Amaral reported that Mitchell allegedly told him: ‘If you go ahead and publish your book, you had better take care.’”
Skype is free if its internet to internet. It only costs money if you are phoning to a landline. Even so, it hardly costs anything, I use it to call friends in Australia and I talk to them for 2 hours and it costs me about £1.50
)
hI Liz
not according to my local Skype company, as they have fixed rates or a standing monthly charge depending on which Tarif you are on, and then you pay for the calls through different rates depending where you call, of course as I do not use Skype I am speaking from a disadvantage, plus I do beleive that everything one does on Skype is recorded so be careful of what you say, also I did have someone call me from Australia and they said it was costing them so much for the package which they were on something like 100 AUSD per year, anyway thank you for your input