<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bank of England, Sterling and Government Treason</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ukcolumn.org/2009/04/14/bank-of-england/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ukcolumn.org/2009/04/14/bank-of-england/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Mercer</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Mercer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 15:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-5336</guid>
		<description>There is a lot of credence in the 13 families theory,as first hypothesised by fritz springmeier.
talking of change,i dont think there will be any,it does`nt matter who you vote for,the government always get in.Cameron WILL be the next PM of the UK,he was in a society at Oxford which contained luminaries such as Boris Johnson(Mayor of London),but most worryingly a certain Nathan Rothschild,can i wager that he will be installed in Cameron`s government as an advisor on economic policy,he won`t be on the frontline,in the cabinet,but he will be in the background,where the Rothchilds operate most effectively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a lot of credence in the 13 families theory,as first hypothesised by fritz springmeier.<br />
talking of change,i dont think there will be any,it does`nt matter who you vote for,the government always get in.Cameron WILL be the next PM of the UK,he was in a society at Oxford which contained luminaries such as Boris Johnson(Mayor of London),but most worryingly a certain Nathan Rothschild,can i wager that he will be installed in Cameron`s government as an advisor on economic policy,he won`t be on the frontline,in the cabinet,but he will be in the background,where the Rothchilds operate most effectively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vicky</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 12:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-4841</guid>
		<description>Labour- A party of the working class, when in it&#039;s fold Fabians make up the majority of their numbers in Westmnister including ALL Labours Prime-Ministers?

East India Company.

The aims of the Fabian Society was developed by Webb, from what Englishman John Ruskin(1819-1900) taught at Oxford University. Ruskin, a teacher at the Working Men’s College(founded in 1854 by Christian-Socialist philosopher J. F. D. Maurice), a professor of Fine Arts at Oxford, an artist and writer, based his views on those of Socialist Robert Owen. He advocated a utopian society, and espoused theories developed from the teachings of Plato(428-347 BC), who studied under Socrates, and became the greatest philosopher in history. Plate established an academy which operated for 800 years, producing many great men, including Aristotle. In his work, The Republic, he outlined his ideal society, which was an aristocratic society ruled by the elite. It included the elimination of marriage and the family, and introduced selective breeding by the government, who would destroy all inferior offspring. In Plate’s utopia, sexual equality dictated that women would fight alongside the men in times of war.

Shaw(whose mistress, Florence Farr, was a witch in the Order of the Golden Dawn), revealed that their goal was to be achieved by “stealth, intrigue, subversion, and the deception of never calling socialism by its right name.” In fact, that’s how they got their name. The name originated from the Roman Consul, General Quintus Fabius Maximus, the Cunctator ( ” Delayer ” ) , who through patient, cautious, delaying and elusive tactics, during the early phases of the Second Punic War(218-201 BC), enabled the Roman army to regroup and defeat Hannibal’s stronger Carthaginian army.

The Fabians were working towards a new world, by indoctrinating young scholars who would eventually rise to power in various policy-making positions throughout the world; by infiltrating educational institutions, government agencies, and political parties. Their strategy was called the “doctrine of inevitability of gradualism,” 

CONTINUES BELOW..
http://silverbearcafe.com/private/NWO/nwo4.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Labour- A party of the working class, when in it&#8217;s fold Fabians make up the majority of their numbers in Westmnister including ALL Labours Prime-Ministers?</p>
<p>East India Company.</p>
<p>The aims of the Fabian Society was developed by Webb, from what Englishman John Ruskin(1819-1900) taught at Oxford University. Ruskin, a teacher at the Working Men’s College(founded in 1854 by Christian-Socialist philosopher J. F. D. Maurice), a professor of Fine Arts at Oxford, an artist and writer, based his views on those of Socialist Robert Owen. He advocated a utopian society, and espoused theories developed from the teachings of Plato(428-347 BC), who studied under Socrates, and became the greatest philosopher in history. Plate established an academy which operated for 800 years, producing many great men, including Aristotle. In his work, The Republic, he outlined his ideal society, which was an aristocratic society ruled by the elite. It included the elimination of marriage and the family, and introduced selective breeding by the government, who would destroy all inferior offspring. In Plate’s utopia, sexual equality dictated that women would fight alongside the men in times of war.</p>
<p>Shaw(whose mistress, Florence Farr, was a witch in the Order of the Golden Dawn), revealed that their goal was to be achieved by “stealth, intrigue, subversion, and the deception of never calling socialism by its right name.” In fact, that’s how they got their name. The name originated from the Roman Consul, General Quintus Fabius Maximus, the Cunctator ( ” Delayer ” ) , who through patient, cautious, delaying and elusive tactics, during the early phases of the Second Punic War(218-201 BC), enabled the Roman army to regroup and defeat Hannibal’s stronger Carthaginian army.</p>
<p>The Fabians were working towards a new world, by indoctrinating young scholars who would eventually rise to power in various policy-making positions throughout the world; by infiltrating educational institutions, government agencies, and political parties. Their strategy was called the “doctrine of inevitability of gradualism,” </p>
<p>CONTINUES BELOW..<br />
<a href="http://silverbearcafe.com/private/NWO/nwo4.html" rel="nofollow">http://silverbearcafe.com/private/NWO/nwo4.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedAlert</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>RedAlert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 14:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-4578</guid>
		<description>MPs&#039; expenses - another weapon of mass distraction:

Daily Telegraph goes on warpath against those venal (or just led to being gullible?) MPs and is followed by the red-tops (red -  Cockney slang for money - Bolshevism - the red dragon - the lifeblood - etc etc).

This is another ploy to take the public&#039;s attention away from (i) the seriousness of the global economic crisis and (ii) its causes - the latter being principally the rowing of the money supply and government slackening off banking regulation in 1990s onwards. The banksters are feeling the heat of exposure. So they do their fair weather friend act on the politicos via the owned media like the DTs.

Before the forthcoming Euro elections and also in any UK General Election that may be called imminently  I suggest you contact the marginal parties who are touting themselves and apply the acid test of demanding what is their position on reforming the UK&#039;s monetary basis and specifically regarding:

-- debt money - money being created through incurring debt which action leads to the need for an insatiable spiral of never ending &#039;growth&#039; (see christmartenson.com) and the fact that interest on the debt is not created leading to increased bankruptcy exposure since all dues cannot be paid back if loans are retired and the money supply diminishes;
-- the removal of the vestiges of political control over the BoE in 1997 - why is the UK Government itself not creating all currency/money and why are the debentureholders of the BoE allowed to syphon off millions upon millions in a meaningless loop circuit in the money creation process;
-- fractional reserve / reserve asset based banking which is a Ponzi scheme allowing banks to lend out many more times the quantity of money they have received which gears their returns but creates an inherently unstable system - taxpayer is then shafted by the subsequent bailouts being financed out of taxes of this and future generations - more debt slavery.

Unless and until the monetary basis of society in the West is sorted out and made more equitable we will continue to endure needless debt slavery and all that entails in terms of societal breakdown and personal misery.

Does anyone know of a succinct form of words that encapsulates the vices of the UK money supply system - with suggested soultions (no gold backing please) - that could be sent to the new parties when they canvass? I forgo mention of the Lib/Lab/Con since history shows they know perfectly well what the issue is and will never address it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MPs&#8217; expenses &#8211; another weapon of mass distraction:</p>
<p>Daily Telegraph goes on warpath against those venal (or just led to being gullible?) MPs and is followed by the red-tops (red &#8211;  Cockney slang for money &#8211; Bolshevism &#8211; the red dragon &#8211; the lifeblood &#8211; etc etc).</p>
<p>This is another ploy to take the public&#8217;s attention away from (i) the seriousness of the global economic crisis and (ii) its causes &#8211; the latter being principally the rowing of the money supply and government slackening off banking regulation in 1990s onwards. The banksters are feeling the heat of exposure. So they do their fair weather friend act on the politicos via the owned media like the DTs.</p>
<p>Before the forthcoming Euro elections and also in any UK General Election that may be called imminently  I suggest you contact the marginal parties who are touting themselves and apply the acid test of demanding what is their position on reforming the UK&#8217;s monetary basis and specifically regarding:</p>
<p>&#8211; debt money &#8211; money being created through incurring debt which action leads to the need for an insatiable spiral of never ending &#8216;growth&#8217; (see christmartenson.com) and the fact that interest on the debt is not created leading to increased bankruptcy exposure since all dues cannot be paid back if loans are retired and the money supply diminishes;<br />
&#8211; the removal of the vestiges of political control over the BoE in 1997 &#8211; why is the UK Government itself not creating all currency/money and why are the debentureholders of the BoE allowed to syphon off millions upon millions in a meaningless loop circuit in the money creation process;<br />
&#8211; fractional reserve / reserve asset based banking which is a Ponzi scheme allowing banks to lend out many more times the quantity of money they have received which gears their returns but creates an inherently unstable system &#8211; taxpayer is then shafted by the subsequent bailouts being financed out of taxes of this and future generations &#8211; more debt slavery.</p>
<p>Unless and until the monetary basis of society in the West is sorted out and made more equitable we will continue to endure needless debt slavery and all that entails in terms of societal breakdown and personal misery.</p>
<p>Does anyone know of a succinct form of words that encapsulates the vices of the UK money supply system &#8211; with suggested soultions (no gold backing please) &#8211; that could be sent to the new parties when they canvass? I forgo mention of the Lib/Lab/Con since history shows they know perfectly well what the issue is and will never address it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Welsh</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-4130</guid>
		<description>Aaron, yes many of us have. And, for me, it is a vision of what we COULD be as a race and what we COULD achieve. For others they see it as almost an ad for the NWO!! They see it as talking about a one collaborative (and therefore communistic) world. They, therefore, see it as some hidden type of propaganda for the NWO.

Personally, I don&#039;t agree. They are, along with the Venus project, promoting a utopian world which is entirely within our capability but, sadly, not yet within our grasp until we somehow eradicate the existing monetary based framework of society and those who control it.

Money is not the issue. The manipulation of it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, yes many of us have. And, for me, it is a vision of what we COULD be as a race and what we COULD achieve. For others they see it as almost an ad for the NWO!! They see it as talking about a one collaborative (and therefore communistic) world. They, therefore, see it as some hidden type of propaganda for the NWO.</p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t agree. They are, along with the Venus project, promoting a utopian world which is entirely within our capability but, sadly, not yet within our grasp until we somehow eradicate the existing monetary based framework of society and those who control it.</p>
<p>Money is not the issue. The manipulation of it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Watkins</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Watkins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 14:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-4032</guid>
		<description>Has anyone heard of the Zeitgeist and Zeitgeist Addendum movies? They&#039;re documentary movies about monetary systems and it shows how the american central bank the federal reserve was swindled into place by bankers in about 1913. Just type &#039;zeitgeist&#039; into google and it will be the first link on the search.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone heard of the Zeitgeist and Zeitgeist Addendum movies? They&#8217;re documentary movies about monetary systems and it shows how the american central bank the federal reserve was swindled into place by bankers in about 1913. Just type &#8216;zeitgeist&#8217; into google and it will be the first link on the search.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabine K McNeill</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabine K McNeill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 09:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3890</guid>
		<description>Well done for having put this together! Thank You!!!

We&#039;ve been advised to &#039;go for Parliamentary scrutiny via the Treasury Select Committee&#039; and have recently held two meetings at the House of Commons again. See http://forumforstablecurrencies.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/apr-23-09-for-web-posterity/ and http://rm14.wordpress.com/april-23-2009/stories-cases/ 

&quot;Audit the Fed&quot; needs to be paralleled by &quot;Audit the BoE&quot;, methinks. 

See also &quot;Sovereignty &amp; Seignorage - The Legal Privilege and a Financial Mechanism of Nation States&quot; on http://greencredit.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/sovereignty-and-seignorage-report.pdf - based on the analysis of the online data base of the BoE. 

More power to everybody&#039;s net-elbows!
Sabine
Organiser, Forum for Stable Currencies
http://forumnews.wordpress.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done for having put this together! Thank You!!!</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been advised to &#8216;go for Parliamentary scrutiny via the Treasury Select Committee&#8217; and have recently held two meetings at the House of Commons again. See <a href="http://forumforstablecurrencies.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/apr-23-09-for-web-posterity/" rel="nofollow">http://forumforstablecurrencies.wordpress.com/2009/04/26/apr-23-09-for-web-posterity/</a> and <a href="http://rm14.wordpress.com/april-23-2009/stories-cases/" rel="nofollow">http://rm14.wordpress.com/april-23-2009/stories-cases/</a> </p>
<p>&#8220;Audit the Fed&#8221; needs to be paralleled by &#8220;Audit the BoE&#8221;, methinks. </p>
<p>See also &#8220;Sovereignty &amp; Seignorage &#8211; The Legal Privilege and a Financial Mechanism of Nation States&#8221; on <a href="http://greencredit.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/sovereignty-and-seignorage-report.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://greencredit.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/sovereignty-and-seignorage-report.pdf</a> &#8211; based on the analysis of the online data base of the BoE. </p>
<p>More power to everybody&#8217;s net-elbows!<br />
Sabine<br />
Organiser, Forum for Stable Currencies<br />
<a href="http://forumnews.wordpress.com" rel="nofollow">http://forumnews.wordpress.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Welsh</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 10:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3576</guid>
		<description>The problem we have here in the UK is that people STILL wonder what the American Federal Reserve issues have got to do with us!! We have serious need for education in this country. Most just don&#039;t seem to get it!
When you say &quot;The Fed is the same as the Bank of England and neither are tied to government nor work in the best interests of either country&quot; they just glaze over.

They just don&#039;t understand their apathy and ignorance is digging their own grave!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAVaOe2zV3w


Ron Paul Revolution Sweeping The GOP
May 5, 2009

Dear Friend of Liberty,

With each passing day, Ron Paul is winning people over to the cause of Federal Reserve transparency and sound money.

More and more Congressmen have been signing onto Dr. Paul’s Audit the Fed bill, HR 1207, and it is now up to a whopping 124 cosponsors.

That cosponsor list now includes over half of the House Republican Caucus. Dr. Paul is truly leading the GOP back to its roots of sound money and fiscal conservatism.

In fact, The Washington Independent’s David Weigel just wrote an important article about how Ron Paul’s message is resonating with Republican lawmakers. All I can say is, &quot;It&#039;s about time!&quot;

http://washingtonindependent.com/41786/ron-pauls-economic-theories-winning-gop-converts

And today, Dr. Paul proved the case for Federal Reserve transparency to people across America by grilling Ben Bernanke on national television.

Chairman Ben is running scared now that HR 1207 is gaining steam. He even tried to appease Dr. Paul by offering transparency on everything except monetary policy -- the Fed&#039;s sole function!

It is clear we are winning this fight, and I believe that ultimately we will see it through to victory. But this is no time to rest on our laurels.

Keep writing and calling your congressman if he has not already cosponsored HR 1207. 

http://www.campaignforliberty.com/campaigns/supporthr1207.php

Circulate more petitions and Audit the Fed literature to your friends and neighbors to recruit them to this winning effort.

Thank you for all you have done and all you will do. With your continued support, Ron Paul and Campaign for Liberty will return the GOP to its conservative roots, and America back to its founding principles.

In Liberty,

John Tate
President, Campaign for Liberty</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem we have here in the UK is that people STILL wonder what the American Federal Reserve issues have got to do with us!! We have serious need for education in this country. Most just don&#8217;t seem to get it!<br />
When you say &#8220;The Fed is the same as the Bank of England and neither are tied to government nor work in the best interests of either country&#8221; they just glaze over.</p>
<p>They just don&#8217;t understand their apathy and ignorance is digging their own grave!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAVaOe2zV3w" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wAVaOe2zV3w</a></p>
<p>Ron Paul Revolution Sweeping The GOP<br />
May 5, 2009</p>
<p>Dear Friend of Liberty,</p>
<p>With each passing day, Ron Paul is winning people over to the cause of Federal Reserve transparency and sound money.</p>
<p>More and more Congressmen have been signing onto Dr. Paul’s Audit the Fed bill, HR 1207, and it is now up to a whopping 124 cosponsors.</p>
<p>That cosponsor list now includes over half of the House Republican Caucus. Dr. Paul is truly leading the GOP back to its roots of sound money and fiscal conservatism.</p>
<p>In fact, The Washington Independent’s David Weigel just wrote an important article about how Ron Paul’s message is resonating with Republican lawmakers. All I can say is, &#8220;It&#8217;s about time!&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/41786/ron-pauls-economic-theories-winning-gop-converts" rel="nofollow">http://washingtonindependent.com/41786/ron-pauls-economic-theories-winning-gop-converts</a></p>
<p>And today, Dr. Paul proved the case for Federal Reserve transparency to people across America by grilling Ben Bernanke on national television.</p>
<p>Chairman Ben is running scared now that HR 1207 is gaining steam. He even tried to appease Dr. Paul by offering transparency on everything except monetary policy &#8212; the Fed&#8217;s sole function!</p>
<p>It is clear we are winning this fight, and I believe that ultimately we will see it through to victory. But this is no time to rest on our laurels.</p>
<p>Keep writing and calling your congressman if he has not already cosponsored HR 1207. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.campaignforliberty.com/campaigns/supporthr1207.php" rel="nofollow">http://www.campaignforliberty.com/campaigns/supporthr1207.php</a></p>
<p>Circulate more petitions and Audit the Fed literature to your friends and neighbors to recruit them to this winning effort.</p>
<p>Thank you for all you have done and all you will do. With your continued support, Ron Paul and Campaign for Liberty will return the GOP to its conservative roots, and America back to its founding principles.</p>
<p>In Liberty,</p>
<p>John Tate<br />
President, Campaign for Liberty</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiggins</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 19:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3544</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve long advocated voting Independents in Local Elections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve long advocated voting Independents in Local Elections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wiggins</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Wiggins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 19:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3543</guid>
		<description>The reason that the public bury their heads in the sand, is because they can&#039;t stand the truth. Can you imagine any American citizen actually ever believing - even with concrete proof - that their goverment MAY have been involved in the September 11 2001 &#039;terrorist&#039; attack on the World Trade Centre ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason that the public bury their heads in the sand, is because they can&#8217;t stand the truth. Can you imagine any American citizen actually ever believing &#8211; even with concrete proof &#8211; that their goverment MAY have been involved in the September 11 2001 &#8216;terrorist&#8217; attack on the World Trade Centre ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2009 13:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3537</guid>
		<description>Attention  Paul from Devon

Well good luck with the lloyds debacle !!
however its over simplistic to divide the alledged assetts of Britain between the general public , firstly as they have no means by which to cash them in.

The City of London is a separate entity to the rest of the country , protocol demands the Queen ask permission from the Lord mayor.

I hope you find the following informative.
The three city states rules the world  together.  

The “CITY” in London 

The &quot;City&quot;, also known as the &quot;square mile&quot; an area of 677 hectares in London is just like the Vatican City in Rome their own state. The City-State, pays no tax, has its own courts, its own laws, their own flag, their own private police at about 2,000 men, and a night population that underestimates 9000 inhabitants. 
Here are the Bank of England, a privately owned institution which is not subject to regulation by the British Parliament, and in fact is a sovereign world power. Moreover, Lloyd&#039;s of London (insurance), London Stock Exchange (stock exchange) Fleet Streets newspapers and publishing, offices in all British banks, offices in 385 foreign banks, and 70 U.S. banks. 
Internationaly they use the &quot;Crown Princess&quot; as a symbol of power but the real power belongs to the bankers and not the royal house. It is very difficult to gain an insight into the persons who effectively control the Bank of England. A name that leaked is Rothschild. 
The &quot;City of London&quot; is an economic entity which is legally separate from England and in control of all lawyers and banks across the world - including the Federal Reserve in the USA! The &quot;City&quot; is also the English seat of the world&#039;s Freemansonry with the United Grand Lodge of England as the center. http://www.ugle.org.uk 
 
See link for more .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Attention  Paul from Devon</p>
<p>Well good luck with the lloyds debacle !!<br />
however its over simplistic to divide the alledged assetts of Britain between the general public , firstly as they have no means by which to cash them in.</p>
<p>The City of London is a separate entity to the rest of the country , protocol demands the Queen ask permission from the Lord mayor.</p>
<p>I hope you find the following informative.<br />
The three city states rules the world  together.  </p>
<p>The “CITY” in London </p>
<p>The &#8220;City&#8221;, also known as the &#8220;square mile&#8221; an area of 677 hectares in London is just like the Vatican City in Rome their own state. The City-State, pays no tax, has its own courts, its own laws, their own flag, their own private police at about 2,000 men, and a night population that underestimates 9000 inhabitants.<br />
Here are the Bank of England, a privately owned institution which is not subject to regulation by the British Parliament, and in fact is a sovereign world power. Moreover, Lloyd&#8217;s of London (insurance), London Stock Exchange (stock exchange) Fleet Streets newspapers and publishing, offices in all British banks, offices in 385 foreign banks, and 70 U.S. banks.<br />
Internationaly they use the &#8220;Crown Princess&#8221; as a symbol of power but the real power belongs to the bankers and not the royal house. It is very difficult to gain an insight into the persons who effectively control the Bank of England. A name that leaked is Rothschild.<br />
The &#8220;City of London&#8221; is an economic entity which is legally separate from England and in control of all lawyers and banks across the world &#8211; including the Federal Reserve in the USA! The &#8220;City&#8221; is also the English seat of the world&#8217;s Freemansonry with the United Grand Lodge of England as the center. <a href="http://www.ugle.org.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.ugle.org.uk</a> </p>
<p>See link for more .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Welsh</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Welsh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 23:53:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3531</guid>
		<description>Paul, that&#039;s a very interesting situation you have there! TPUC by chance? And while I understand where you&#039;re going with all of this and follow the logic, it is also interesting to note that while we have a share in thic Corporation called the UK, we are, I believe, in &quot;bankruptcy&quot;.

Would be interested to explore/discuss further with you on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul, that&#8217;s a very interesting situation you have there! TPUC by chance? And while I understand where you&#8217;re going with all of this and follow the logic, it is also interesting to note that while we have a share in thic Corporation called the UK, we are, I believe, in &#8220;bankruptcy&#8221;.</p>
<p>Would be interested to explore/discuss further with you on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul from Devon</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul from Devon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 18:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3528</guid>
		<description>Correct me if I wrong but, to get a grip on the situation, one has to stand back from all the crap and illusions and take a simple view. The UK is a corporation. That corporation owns the assets of the UK (forget for a moment all the complex financial instruments and money). The UK corporation has shareholders and workers - you and me and, in my mind, one&#039;s birth certificate is your &quot;share&quot; certificate. There are roughly 60,000,000 of us - all of who own 1/60,000,000 of the assets of this country (that is nett assets - less liabilities). Someone (I don&#039;t know who) worked out that each &quot;share&quot; is &quot;worth&quot; around £25,000,000 - each. In a complex way (that for this view the details are immaterial) The &quot;Corporation&quot; of which we are all &quot;shareholder&quot; owns the nett assets of the country.
They are not producing money &quot;out of this air&quot; - they are creating it, backed by the assets of the &quot;corporation&quot; - in other words, the nett assets of the entire country. As we are shareholder in the &quot;corporation&quot;, they are, in fact, &quot;lending&quot; us money - backed by what we already own - our &quot;share&quot; in the &quot;corporation&quot;. 
I know that this is a massively simplified view but, when it comes down to it, they are making money by simply &quot;lending&quot; us what we already own. The only &quot;money&quot; the banks &quot;risk&quot; is the small portion that they have to lend themselves, which, in the scheme of things is minimal.
As it is illegal for a bank to lend depositor&#039;s money, what they lend has to be secured on solid and tangible assets (directly or indirectly).
In short, the banks are lending money (worthless paper or figures on a computer) backed by what we already own and charging us interest on our own money (as 90 or 95% of it comes from the &quot;corporation&quot; - which in turn &quot;we&quot; own).
I am currently embroiled with a very strange and increasingly bizarre battle with Lloyds TSB regarding security they took for a loan that was never made. Now, this is clearly breach of contract and we are taking the required action for this and damages caused but, one of the other items we are going to &quot;test&quot; is to get the bank (with respect to other small business loans we have) to prove that the money lent was from them and not from &quot;the corporation&quot; (as it was) because, if the latter is true and, as I partially own the &quot;corporation&quot;, they have simply lent me what I already owned and the contact is void - as they have suffered no loss.

I know that this is a simplistic view of things but, as I said, one has to sometimes stand back to look at the whole picture and, as I see it, despite the smoke and mirrors that they throw up (in the form of complex financial instruments - I wonder if they are able to form a band with them),  the basic facts are that, they are not making money &quot;out of thin air, water or anything like that&quot; - they are printing it, backed by &quot;our&quot; shares in the corporation of which they are directors and managers - and they are doing it fraudulently.

Paul

BTW - The &quot;battle&quot; (well it&#039;s not really) with Lloyds becomes more bizarre by the day. This week alone, I received a letter saying how pleased they were to offer us back our working overdraft (despite the fact that when we try to pay money in - it comes back &quot;account closed&quot;???) then the following day, we received a formal demand for all the money back (dated the day before the letter offering the money) - anyone like to tell me if I have an overdraft facility or not  ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I wrong but, to get a grip on the situation, one has to stand back from all the crap and illusions and take a simple view. The UK is a corporation. That corporation owns the assets of the UK (forget for a moment all the complex financial instruments and money). The UK corporation has shareholders and workers &#8211; you and me and, in my mind, one&#8217;s birth certificate is your &#8220;share&#8221; certificate. There are roughly 60,000,000 of us &#8211; all of who own 1/60,000,000 of the assets of this country (that is nett assets &#8211; less liabilities). Someone (I don&#8217;t know who) worked out that each &#8220;share&#8221; is &#8220;worth&#8221; around £25,000,000 &#8211; each. In a complex way (that for this view the details are immaterial) The &#8220;Corporation&#8221; of which we are all &#8220;shareholder&#8221; owns the nett assets of the country.<br />
They are not producing money &#8220;out of this air&#8221; &#8211; they are creating it, backed by the assets of the &#8220;corporation&#8221; &#8211; in other words, the nett assets of the entire country. As we are shareholder in the &#8220;corporation&#8221;, they are, in fact, &#8220;lending&#8221; us money &#8211; backed by what we already own &#8211; our &#8220;share&#8221; in the &#8220;corporation&#8221;.<br />
I know that this is a massively simplified view but, when it comes down to it, they are making money by simply &#8220;lending&#8221; us what we already own. The only &#8220;money&#8221; the banks &#8220;risk&#8221; is the small portion that they have to lend themselves, which, in the scheme of things is minimal.<br />
As it is illegal for a bank to lend depositor&#8217;s money, what they lend has to be secured on solid and tangible assets (directly or indirectly).<br />
In short, the banks are lending money (worthless paper or figures on a computer) backed by what we already own and charging us interest on our own money (as 90 or 95% of it comes from the &#8220;corporation&#8221; &#8211; which in turn &#8220;we&#8221; own).<br />
I am currently embroiled with a very strange and increasingly bizarre battle with Lloyds TSB regarding security they took for a loan that was never made. Now, this is clearly breach of contract and we are taking the required action for this and damages caused but, one of the other items we are going to &#8220;test&#8221; is to get the bank (with respect to other small business loans we have) to prove that the money lent was from them and not from &#8220;the corporation&#8221; (as it was) because, if the latter is true and, as I partially own the &#8220;corporation&#8221;, they have simply lent me what I already owned and the contact is void &#8211; as they have suffered no loss.</p>
<p>I know that this is a simplistic view of things but, as I said, one has to sometimes stand back to look at the whole picture and, as I see it, despite the smoke and mirrors that they throw up (in the form of complex financial instruments &#8211; I wonder if they are able to form a band with them),  the basic facts are that, they are not making money &#8220;out of thin air, water or anything like that&#8221; &#8211; they are printing it, backed by &#8220;our&#8221; shares in the corporation of which they are directors and managers &#8211; and they are doing it fraudulently.</p>
<p>Paul</p>
<p>BTW &#8211; The &#8220;battle&#8221; (well it&#8217;s not really) with Lloyds becomes more bizarre by the day. This week alone, I received a letter saying how pleased they were to offer us back our working overdraft (despite the fact that when we try to pay money in &#8211; it comes back &#8220;account closed&#8221;???) then the following day, we received a formal demand for all the money back (dated the day before the letter offering the money) &#8211; anyone like to tell me if I have an overdraft facility or not  ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 21:01:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3478</guid>
		<description>Reply to Core Luminous

In essence all children are born with innate intelligence:

Then the (P)harmaceuticle industry begin to destroy this with vaccines.
Then comes the
United Nations

UN-0010---FREEDOM ON THE ALTER : The U.N.’s Crusade Against God and Family - William Norman Grigg - $12.00 
Documents the U.N.’s vision of a New World Order, where children will be indoctrinated in socialist ‘values’ which may include compulsory ‘volunteer labor’; where control will be exercised over all family life, including coercive population control, parental ‘Licensing’ and the seizure of children from parents deemed ‘incompetant’ by U.N. approved officials; and where America’s culture, free institutions and biblically-derived values will be eradicated--in preparation for the official world religion. 

UN-0020---PARENT POLICE : The United Nations Want Your Children - Ingrid J. Guzman - List Price - $6.34 (@) Click Here to Order!! 
Not long ago, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a treaty that could put an end to parenting as we know it. If ratified, this treaty would turn the state into the co-parent, with authority to “assist” in child rearing. It would also give the state the power to enforce such so-called “children’s rights” as (1) :The right of the child to object to all religious teaching (Article 14); (2) : The right of the child to associate with anyone they chose, regardless of their parent’s wishes (Article 14); (3) : The right of the child to see, hear or read whatever they chose (Article 13). Don’t be misled or deceived by advocates of “Children’s Rights”. If ratified, this treaty will make parents subject to prosecution for trying to instill values that the U.N. decides are not in the best interest of their child

Whatever wealth one has its useless without good Health this is one of the Elites main targets. Every attempt is being made to prevent us looking after our own health.
they use CODEX ALIMENTARIOUS  this was set in motion by either I G Farben or its present day constiuents.

I have added the above link to Dr Mathias Rath . which is a good starting point ,
I have also noted that some of you are aware of the dangers of ASPARTAME...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reply to Core Luminous</p>
<p>In essence all children are born with innate intelligence:</p>
<p>Then the (P)harmaceuticle industry begin to destroy this with vaccines.<br />
Then comes the<br />
United Nations</p>
<p>UN-0010&#8212;FREEDOM ON THE ALTER : The U.N.’s Crusade Against God and Family &#8211; William Norman Grigg &#8211; $12.00<br />
Documents the U.N.’s vision of a New World Order, where children will be indoctrinated in socialist ‘values’ which may include compulsory ‘volunteer labor’; where control will be exercised over all family life, including coercive population control, parental ‘Licensing’ and the seizure of children from parents deemed ‘incompetant’ by U.N. approved officials; and where America’s culture, free institutions and biblically-derived values will be eradicated&#8211;in preparation for the official world religion. </p>
<p>UN-0020&#8212;PARENT POLICE : The United Nations Want Your Children &#8211; Ingrid J. Guzman &#8211; List Price &#8211; $6.34 (@) Click Here to Order!!<br />
Not long ago, the United Nations General Assembly adopted a treaty that could put an end to parenting as we know it. If ratified, this treaty would turn the state into the co-parent, with authority to “assist” in child rearing. It would also give the state the power to enforce such so-called “children’s rights” as (1) :The right of the child to object to all religious teaching (Article 14); (2) : The right of the child to associate with anyone they chose, regardless of their parent’s wishes (Article 14); (3) : The right of the child to see, hear or read whatever they chose (Article 13). Don’t be misled or deceived by advocates of “Children’s Rights”. If ratified, this treaty will make parents subject to prosecution for trying to instill values that the U.N. decides are not in the best interest of their child</p>
<p>Whatever wealth one has its useless without good Health this is one of the Elites main targets. Every attempt is being made to prevent us looking after our own health.<br />
they use CODEX ALIMENTARIOUS  this was set in motion by either I G Farben or its present day constiuents.</p>
<p>I have added the above link to Dr Mathias Rath . which is a good starting point ,<br />
I have also noted that some of you are aware of the dangers of ASPARTAME&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3477</guid>
		<description>Yes Mocklate ,that is defeatist 

 one point that stands out with the many I speak with &amp; email ,many can real off lists of the obvious ie freemasons, bilderberger, CFR, black nobility ,13 families . he one that usually gets ommitted is our in house 5th column that being COMMON PURPOSE why not listen to Brian Gerrish an ex Naval Officer , he is an excellent speaker. link above and also at the top of this website.

One point that sticks out in my mind when he is speaking interuptions usually about the above mentioned;
his reply : as an ex military man when being shot at the priority is to see wher its coming from little point convcerning whats miles away. He does of course talk on the above.

He has stated the biggest fear COMMON PURPOSE has s being discovered and he encourages people to call their local councils &amp; police to ask how much they spend on Common purpose.

We Also have a written Constitution &amp; Bill of rights</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes Mocklate ,that is defeatist </p>
<p> one point that stands out with the many I speak with &amp; email ,many can real off lists of the obvious ie freemasons, bilderberger, CFR, black nobility ,13 families . he one that usually gets ommitted is our in house 5th column that being COMMON PURPOSE why not listen to Brian Gerrish an ex Naval Officer , he is an excellent speaker. link above and also at the top of this website.</p>
<p>One point that sticks out in my mind when he is speaking interuptions usually about the above mentioned;<br />
his reply : as an ex military man when being shot at the priority is to see wher its coming from little point convcerning whats miles away. He does of course talk on the above.</p>
<p>He has stated the biggest fear COMMON PURPOSE has s being discovered and he encourages people to call their local councils &amp; police to ask how much they spend on Common purpose.</p>
<p>We Also have a written Constitution &amp; Bill of rights</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:08:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3475</guid>
		<description>Steve 

It would be nice if it worked however there are charges against the Fereral Reserve oustanding since 1934 Louis Mcfadden tried hard but was bumped off , it took 3 times to kill him

See charge below
On May 23, 1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND TREASON. 
The petition for Articles of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee and has 
YET TO BE ACTED ON. 
So, this ELECTRONIC BOOKLET should be reprinted, reposted, 
set up on web pages and circulated far and wide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve </p>
<p>It would be nice if it worked however there are charges against the Fereral Reserve oustanding since 1934 Louis Mcfadden tried hard but was bumped off , it took 3 times to kill him</p>
<p>See charge below<br />
On May 23, 1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts, including but not limited to, CONSPIRACY, FRAUD, UNLAWFUL CONVERSION, AND TREASON.<br />
The petition for Articles of Impeachment was thereafter referred to the Judiciary Committee and has<br />
YET TO BE ACTED ON.<br />
So, this ELECTRONIC BOOKLET should be reprinted, reposted,<br />
set up on web pages and circulated far and wide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3473</guid>
		<description>Chris O Reply: sorry I 1st posted this I think in the wrong place apologies
April 30th, 2009 at 8:28 pm

This seems a very civilised forum :
Perhaps we should recert to the old system used in the usa known as Colonial Scrip

——————————————————————————–

A study of American Colonial history will reveal that Benjamin Franklin went to England as a representative of the Colonies.

The English officials asked how it was the Colonies managed to collect enough taxes to build poor houses, and how they were able to handle the great burden of caring for the poor. Franklin’s reply was most revealing: “We have no poor houses in the Colonies, and if we had, we would have no one to put in them, as in the Colonies there is not a single unemployed man, no poor and no vagabonds.” Think long and hard about this. In the American colonies before the American Revolution, there was “not a single unemployed man, no poor and no vagabonds”. — no one on Welfare, no one on Social Security, no homeless, no income tax, no alphabet agencies, No IRS, BATF, FBI, DEA, CIA, HEW, OSHA, SBA, and on and on and on to provide for the “general welfare” of our villages, towns, cities and states. How did Benjamin Franklin explain this to the British officials of his day?
How would he explain it to today’s lawyers, judges, politicians and other government officials? “It is because, in the Colonies, we issue our own paper money. We call it Colonial Script, and we issue only enough to move all goods freely from the producers to the Consumers; and as we create our money, we control the purchasing power of money, and have no interest to pay.”
-Benjamin Franklin

It is also worth reading Louis Mcfadden and his still outstanding challenge to the FED
see link http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris O Reply: sorry I 1st posted this I think in the wrong place apologies<br />
April 30th, 2009 at 8:28 pm</p>
<p>This seems a very civilised forum :<br />
Perhaps we should recert to the old system used in the usa known as Colonial Scrip</p>
<p>——————————————————————————–</p>
<p>A study of American Colonial history will reveal that Benjamin Franklin went to England as a representative of the Colonies.</p>
<p>The English officials asked how it was the Colonies managed to collect enough taxes to build poor houses, and how they were able to handle the great burden of caring for the poor. Franklin’s reply was most revealing: “We have no poor houses in the Colonies, and if we had, we would have no one to put in them, as in the Colonies there is not a single unemployed man, no poor and no vagabonds.” Think long and hard about this. In the American colonies before the American Revolution, there was “not a single unemployed man, no poor and no vagabonds”. — no one on Welfare, no one on Social Security, no homeless, no income tax, no alphabet agencies, No IRS, BATF, FBI, DEA, CIA, HEW, OSHA, SBA, and on and on and on to provide for the “general welfare” of our villages, towns, cities and states. How did Benjamin Franklin explain this to the British officials of his day?<br />
How would he explain it to today’s lawyers, judges, politicians and other government officials? “It is because, in the Colonies, we issue our own paper money. We call it Colonial Script, and we issue only enough to move all goods freely from the producers to the Consumers; and as we create our money, we control the purchasing power of money, and have no interest to pay.”<br />
-Benjamin Franklin</p>
<p>It is also worth reading Louis Mcfadden and his still outstanding challenge to the FED<br />
see link <a href="http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html" rel="nofollow">http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris O</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris O</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 19:28:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3472</guid>
		<description>This seems a very civilised forum :
Perhaps we should recert to the old system used in the usa known as Colonial Scrip


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 A study of American Colonial history will reveal that Benjamin Franklin went to England as a representative of the Colonies.

The English officials asked how it was the Colonies managed to collect enough taxes to build poor houses, and how they were able to handle the great burden of caring for the poor. Franklin&#039;s reply was most revealing: &quot;We have no poor houses in the Colonies, and if we had, we would have no one to put in them, as in the Colonies there is not a single unemployed man, no poor and no vagabonds.&quot; Think long and hard about this. In the American colonies before the American Revolution, there was &quot;not a single unemployed man, no poor and no vagabonds&quot;. -- no one on Welfare, no one on Social Security, no homeless, no income tax, no alphabet agencies, No IRS, BATF, FBI, DEA, CIA, HEW, OSHA, SBA, and on and on and on to provide for the &quot;general welfare&quot; of our villages, towns, cities and states. How did Benjamin Franklin explain this to the British officials of his day? 
How would he explain it to today&#039;s lawyers, judges, politicians and other government officials? &quot;It is because, in the Colonies, we issue our own paper money. We call it Colonial Script, and we issue only enough to move all goods freely from the producers to the Consumers; and as we create our money, we control the purchasing power of money, and have no interest to pay.&quot; 
-Benjamin Franklin

It is also worth reading Louis Mcfadden and his still outstanding challenge to the FED
see link  http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This seems a very civilised forum :<br />
Perhaps we should recert to the old system used in the usa known as Colonial Scrip</p>
<p>&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
<p> A study of American Colonial history will reveal that Benjamin Franklin went to England as a representative of the Colonies.</p>
<p>The English officials asked how it was the Colonies managed to collect enough taxes to build poor houses, and how they were able to handle the great burden of caring for the poor. Franklin&#8217;s reply was most revealing: &#8220;We have no poor houses in the Colonies, and if we had, we would have no one to put in them, as in the Colonies there is not a single unemployed man, no poor and no vagabonds.&#8221; Think long and hard about this. In the American colonies before the American Revolution, there was &#8220;not a single unemployed man, no poor and no vagabonds&#8221;. &#8212; no one on Welfare, no one on Social Security, no homeless, no income tax, no alphabet agencies, No IRS, BATF, FBI, DEA, CIA, HEW, OSHA, SBA, and on and on and on to provide for the &#8220;general welfare&#8221; of our villages, towns, cities and states. How did Benjamin Franklin explain this to the British officials of his day?<br />
How would he explain it to today&#8217;s lawyers, judges, politicians and other government officials? &#8220;It is because, in the Colonies, we issue our own paper money. We call it Colonial Script, and we issue only enough to move all goods freely from the producers to the Consumers; and as we create our money, we control the purchasing power of money, and have no interest to pay.&#8221;<br />
-Benjamin Franklin</p>
<p>It is also worth reading Louis Mcfadden and his still outstanding challenge to the FED<br />
see link  <a href="http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html" rel="nofollow">http://home.hiwaay.net/~becraft/mcfadden.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Editor</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>The Editor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:48:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=845#comment-3449</guid>
		<description>I take it you are referring to the main article? 

Did you come here to add something to the discussion, or just to throw brainless accusations of inaccuracy and so-called conspiracy theory? If you feel there is something inaccurate, why not elaborate and so add to the discussion, and our understanding?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I take it you are referring to the main article? </p>
<p>Did you come here to add something to the discussion, or just to throw brainless accusations of inaccuracy and so-called conspiracy theory? If you feel there is something inaccurate, why not elaborate and so add to the discussion, and our understanding?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
