Time allowed: About three years.
( All candidates must finish what they are doing by 2012)

(Note: Candidates failing to answer all the questions within the time allowed will be forced to spend their entire lives in a fascist prison society without hope of remission).

Engage what tiny amount of brain you have and think, if you can.

Question 1: (20 marks)
The “war on terror” has caused how many deaths in Afghanistan, Iraq, and now Pakistan? Discuss.
(OK these people are rag-heads and want to kill all of us , right? So it doesn’t matter if we kill lots of them, right? Anyway, they started it, right?)
Advice to candidates:
Before answering question 1 ensure you have a good grasp of the figures involved and be prepared to argue that one white person killed in New York is worth 1,000 brown babies killed in an A-rab country.
Extra marks will be awarded if you can supplement your written answer with pictures of dead babies in Iraq, Afghanistan or Gaza.
A bonus of 10 points will be given if you can hypothesise a good reason for the invasion of Iran other than the tired old “weapons of mass destruction” excuse.
(Note: If your reason for the invasion of ,or any attack on Iran is a good one , such that the public might believe it, be aware that the copyright to such an idea is ceded to the governments of Israel and the USA without prejudice nor compensation)

Question 2: OK, weed head: Take 50,000 of the world’s best scientists and 5 billion dollars per annum, put them in a room for 20 years and ask them to find a cure for cancer. Do you think they could?

Advice to candidates: Before answering this question, you may wish to consider the profitability disparity between finding a treatment and finding a cure. Candidates should also ignore any “cures” which are cheap and easy to administer, as these are essentially unprofitable. Marks will be deducted for candidates who refer to cannabis oil, sodium bicarbonate, chlorine dioxide or any other proven treatment that is inexpensive.

Question 3:
“ Democracy is a really good thing. Without democracy, we wouldn’t be able to run the world. As far as systems go, democracy is a much easier way to control the herd than fascism or communism. You see, with democracy the idiots think they’re in charge! It really makes us laugh! We make sure that the politicians of all the parties are in our pockets and have their snouts in the trough of greed. We run things, they do as they‘re told. Ha ha ha”
a) To what extent is it true that voters are “the herd” or “the idiots” ?
b) How many people that voted at the last election considered the number of brown babies murdered in the middle east was1) too many. 2) not enough 3) what babies?

Question 4:
Which internationally revered elder statesman and Nobel peace prize winner said:
“ George Bush and Tony Blair enjoyed many moments of ecstasy together. They like to kill, they like to laugh about killing, they like to laugh about how much money they are making from killing, they like to measure their dicks one against the other, they like to do each other in front of a picture of Lucifer. That’s the sort of down-home boys they are, and Obumma ain’t no different”
Was it:
a) HRH the Queen Elizabeth 11?
b) Alex Jones?
c) Olive Farmer?

Not only does he preside over a load of parliamentarian crooks but he himself, is guilty of
dipping his hands in the trough. See the Daily Telegraph report on his antics.

He wants to get shot of Hazel Blears for her alleged fraud and yet he allows Geoff Hoon and James Purnell, to get off completely for doing almost the same as Hazel. Double Standards, prime minister !

The country is now demanding a General Election but what will be the effect of that ? Not Call Me Dave surely ?

I think we’ll have to wait to see what happens after June 4th. !

It amy take awaiting for the answers and then follow up to logically dissect them. However, I can assure you, how can they answer the Bin Laden question for instance? They cannot! If I were to send you the answers I received from the BBC regarding this and then the further communication, you’d be shocked at their utter contradictions and incapability to form a reasoned, logical response. They can’t for they HAVE NONE!

Then Ken Clarke entirely ignores any and all direct questions re Bilderberg. He won’t answer because he can’t answer. He then deflects by suggesting conspiracy theory and using that old, well used, outdated ploy.
You can’t use it anymore Clarke – there is far too much evidence and far too much contradictory text even within Parliamentary Hansards. It’s just the parliamentarians won’t touch it. They’ll question but then they’ll not question deeply enough because they know how far the rabbit hole goes.

You have the population asking these questions and not letting go on them and THAT will be a different story I’m telling you!

Now take a look at this. Because Sir John Bond is/was part of the Multinational Chairman’s Group. It makes sense then that he would have been a party to this Bilderberg information.

http://www.isgp.eu/organisations/Multinational_Chairmans_Group.htm

Just ask this question Roger: If Bilderberg is comprised of the “brightest minds” and the elite (which it is) and these people saw then that there was an impending disaster on the horizon yet, instead of using their unquestioned ability to stop it or reduce it’s impact, they actually kept pumping the gas into it – meanwhile they had Bush that same year, effect a bill which allowed total free for all while individual states were saying they wished to put strict limitations on the mortage loans.

So, no deep dark secret I suppose IF the HSBC Chairman (and possibly others) raised it that year but it would be interesting to note if those who raised its spectre did so AFTER the Bilderberg conference which was early in the year.

Roger, these people knew 5 YEARS AGO. They, at the very least, then let it happen.

People can say all they wish that “we’re to blame” for our materialistic and spend spend spend pattern BUT they miss a fundamental point. That is that the average Joe doesn’t think to himself “I mustn’t take this great deal to own my own home because I see they are going to pump up the interest rates and screw me and so many others and then there is going to be one almighty crash”.

The average Joe votes in a Government who are meant to act prudently and be our representatives in dealing with such macroeconomic, social and national policy issues.

So yes, while I hear what you’re saying, it does not, in any way, subtract from the issue here.

Re the Thai businessman – I don’t know. Sorry but I am missing the point there.

Meanwhile, note (among others) just one of the attendees that year:

USA – Donilon, Thomas E. – Executive Vice President, Fannie Mae

I recall clipping a Guardian article from 2003 that quoted the then Chairman of HSBC warning publicly of the likely effects of government’s policies of endless borrowing. It may also have mentioned permitting the securitisation of any old thing.

I also recall that the Fed published its money printing statistics until 2006. Before that year you could observe the American money supply increasing exponentially – it doubled in less than a decade.

I think a financial meltdown might have been dimly detectible from those and similar facts. I cannot believe the Asia Times had access to any deep dark secrets – didn’t it belong to an ordinary Thai businessman then?

I’m worried that, with the popular son of Diana in place, the average Brit’s idea of the EU may change.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_qJQCJp4ehc

I can use all the help I can get. One thing that happens is people send me links and articles. Then I need to read them to see if they are relevant. Then I need to pull a paragraph or two and set it up as a post with the Headline, Live Link, etc. It’s time consume, but even if I had 50 people that could do one of those a week, that would be great.

Here is what I sent a few people that offered to volunteer:

1 – My idea is to get a few volunteers to go out and find interesting posts for the blog I set up. I just posted a few where I simply use an excerpt and a link to the article. If we can get permission to

post the entire piece that is fine, but the big guys will never do that. We may get that from other blogs, as they can take whatever we have. This is time consuming to find the pieces and then load them up, and I’d like to be able to put a few up every day.

2 – If this goes well, I will build a website where we will post all of the stuff from the blog, and this way we will get top ranking in Google.

3 – I also need a volunteer to screen and decide on comments we receive. This is relatively easy, with a basic quick read to make sure there is nothing offensive, no profanity and the comment is legitimate.

Then it is nothing more than hitting the button to Publish or Reject.

4 – If all goes well, and we accumulate enough information, I want to write a book . . . How Goldman Sachs Destroyed the World

5 – I also want to start gathering information about where Goldman Sachs executives go. We know they are at the Bank of Italy, Bank of England, US Treasury, etc. Well, where else are they and what are they doing. This could be a book in itself. But if you have time to start Googling names of Goldman Sachs executives, you will see more names and more information. I need to get this info to one person to start outlining.

So that’s where I’m at. If you think you can help, I will give you a login to the blog and we can talk about what you can help with.

————————————————————————————–
Mike Morgan, J.D. Mike@GoldmanSachs666.com

‘Research, Consulting and Investment Services’
Registered Investment Advisor

lots of love,

someone with a brain and a Fuc****ing pair of balls. please stop wasting my time you bunch of paranoid hippies.