Whenever I tell my father I am no longer voting Labour or for ANYONE, he just trots out the usual, ” Oh, so you would have the Tories back in, then?”

People like that cannot understand that the party they have always trusted has sold them down the river.
It does not matter WHO is in power.
We do not have two or three main parties, we have ONE party with two or three BRANCHES.

Now, when you get that in your head and you can by reading the following (then checking the veracity if you so wish of ALL points within the book), then you will no longer doubt that 9/11 was staged.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/4368440/None-Dare-call-it-conspiracy

And yet, I have correspondence from Ken Clarke who just dismisses anything and everything to do with the idea of policy or anything of any substance being discussed at Bilderberg as “conspiracy”!
The man KNOWS he’s talking through a hole in his a*ss and he’s being allowed to do so by the apathy and ignorance of those around him.

These people are CRIMINALS!

1. Has the utmost integrity.
2. Is willing to take on a fight that will have him up to his neck in hell.
3. Understands completely and can fight the case of the constitution vs the riddled corruption in our parliament, goverment and judiciary itself?
4. Why would an honest lawyer, who understands all of this and believes wholeheartedly he can get a conviction, ask for a fee?

I’m playing devil’s advocate here simply because our country is full of corrupt individuals in the very profession we would be looking to hire.

Lastly, I understood that it does not require the privately funded services of a lawyer when the allegations and charges should be brought by our own Police: i.e. the state vs, in this case, the state!

Sorry meant to add the video link!!

This is a war folks and I’ve recognised this for a few months now but it is coming to a head.

It has been confirmed through the SPP and NAU that the financial crisis was orchestrated.
The US States are recognising treason by their own Federal government for selling out to the banks just as we recognise the sedition and treason of Heath and the rest to hand us over to the EU (which is then controlled again by the Banks).

THE UK COLUMN along with the BC GROUP and the BRUGES GROUP and all other groups (No2ID etc) NEED TO MERGE TOGETHER TO GET SUFFICIENT NUMBERS OF PEOPLE TO CAUSE A MOVEMENT AND CHANGE.

Meanwhile, a book which raised more than a number of eyebrows in the House of Commons a couple of decades or so ago is one called “None DARE call it conspiracy”. You can find it here: http://www.scribd.com/doc/4368440/None-Dare-call-it-conspiracy

The comments in the House of Commons about it were as follows:

DEFENCEHL Deb 26 June 1979 vol 400 cc1357-476

Lord MACLEOD of FUINARY

“Nor is it just for money. How many people know another American book of yesteryear by Garry Allen called None Dare Call it Conspiracy? It has sold over 3½ million copies in the United States. Its contents are one reason why more and more young Americans just are not going to play, if a war comes. This book points out not merely that it was the German bankers, Warburg Brothers, who put up £25 million to put Lenin in power in Russia, and who also assisted Trotsky to go from the United 1450 States to join him, but that they also sold nuclear armaments to Russia, not just to get money but to control the Communists so that, if they gain permanent power, the bankers will control them by the vast sums which they are owed back by Russia. The book is, chapter and verse, about foundations; it is chapter and verse about persons, well-known names; it is chapter and verse about the Council of Foreign Relations; and it is chapter and verse about Bilderberg Conferences in Europe—names and all, open to a hundred occasions for criminal libel, which somehow has never been brought. The address where that book can be obtained in this country is: KRP Publications, 245 Cann Road, London, E.11.”

I repeat: “..about Bilderberg Conferences in Europe—names and all, open to a hundred occasions for criminal libel, which somehow has never been brought”

The question is: Why have these libel cases never been brought?? Perhaps because it is all fact and unable to be argued against?

Further re Bilderberg:

What do you make of this?

Please read the following from Clarke in the House of Commons when questioned regarding the nature of his and Blair’s attendance and why either did not openly declare their expenses:
86. That leads me to my second question which is, at the moment, a serious allegation will be of course investigated but should we put an onus on those making allegations that they should provide a threshold of evidence for those allegations? At the moment, if the allegation is serious enough, an investigation may well follow.
(Mr Clarke) “I suppose you could apply the test of whether there is any prima facie evidence or any evidence to support this allegation and I imagine that the Committee do throw out cases where you are met with a vehement denial from the Member of Parliament and where there is no indication whatsoever of there being anything to support the allegation. I do not remember one happening quite like that where someone has been accused of something without there apparently being the slightest grounds. The ones I had in mind were where the allegation, so called, is probably true but the answer that most politicians and most sensible Members of Parliament would give is, “So what? What influence can this possibly have had on the conduct of a Member of Parliament if what you say is true?” I hesitate to go on about my own case but that was my reaction to the allegations against me. The only reason that anybody knew that I had not paid my hotel bill was because somebody wrote to me asking what I had paid for. The Bilderberg conference is surrounded by slightly green ink conspiracy theories so people write to you about it and somebody asked me the question and I wrote back saying that I had paid my own air fare and then discovered that some Greek sponsors, whom I could not recall, turned out to have paid the hotel bill for everybody so that, when I came to pay my hotel bill, it had been paid and I left. If you like, that was true. I think the Committee should have said, “So? What has this unknown Greek done that has somehow possibly led to political advantage being obtained with Tony Blair and Ken Clarke when they found that, fortunately, this conference was sponsored and they did not have to pay for the hotel?” Especially when certainly I had paid my own air fare to get there in the first place. I had attended a political conference and flown home again. I had done nothing else. I did not even know the identity of the company, no doubt, which had paid the hotel bill.”

And the following:
Note also, Clarke is responding to suggestions made that he and Blair were “working together”.

Examination of Witness (Questions 78 – 99)

TUESDAY 27 FEBRUARY 2001

THE RT HON KENNETH CLARKE

“I could add more and I do refer to the one which actually did not cause me any damage when I was linked with Tony Blair when we were mildly rebuked by the Committee for not declaring that we had not paid a hotel bill at a political conference a few years ago, a conference to which I had paid my own air fare, so I had spent hundreds of pounds attending this conference. I do recall that, at first, neither Tony Blair nor myself found it easy to remember whether we had actually paid for the accommodation or not when we had been there, but both of us were separately investigated. That is not my prime motive, my mild indignation on that occasion rapidly passed and I did not make any protest at the time”

It is very interesting that Mr. Clarke states clearly that he had attended a “political conference” when, time and again, Bilderberg, and all those in attendance, have stated it is simply a forum for discussion and nothing more and that those who attend do so in a private capacity. Yet, as you will see as we continue, Bilderberg was formed in 1954, a founder being David Rockefeller (Banker) and Dennis Healey was a founder member also. From then on, they were very much political and have been ever since. Formed, from the beginning, to achieve a new global order after WW2.
Mr Clarke also did not protest too much. I wonder why?

Also from the UK Parliament website:

Portcullis: UK Parliament website.
Papers of Arthur Edward Alexander Shackleton, Baron Shackleton (1911-1994) MP
RefNo S/214
Title Bilderberg Conference
Date 1979
Level File
AccessStatus Closed
ClosedUntil 01/01/2010
Location 36

Papers of Arthur Edward Alexander Shackleton, Baron Shackleton (1911-1994) MP
RefNo S/228
Title Bilderberg Conference
Date 1977
Level File
AccessStatus Closed
ClosedUntil 01/01/2008
Location 36

Both documents are under the 30 year rule! Why on earth would this be for a simple discussion forum which creates no policy?
Note that the second document should have been opened in 2008. It seems it has been kept closed even after the 30 years are now over!

Lastly, as is well established, Mr Brown and Mr Blair attended Bilderberg in 1991 and 1993 respectively (Blair being noted as quietly attending again in Turnberry 1998) yet consider this carefully:

PRIME MINISTER
Bilderberg Group
Norman Baker: To ask the Prime Minister in which years since 1993 (a) he and (b) other Government Ministers have attended meetings of the Bilderberg group. [93240]
The Prime Minister: The information requested is not held centrally.
PRIME MINISTER
Bilderberg Group
Norman Baker: To ask the Prime Minister pursuant to the answer of 12 October 2006, Official Report, column 862W, on the Bilderberg Group, if he will provide the information requested in respect of himself since 1997. [95308]
The Prime Minister: I have not attended any such meetings.

Ok. Now you have considered it and, perhaps, there seems nothing of any concern, please re-read once you recognise that Blair did not answer the first question BECAUSE it was asked of “The Prime Minister” and not of “Tony Blair”. So therefore it was re-asked from the time he had become Prime Minister in 1997. He would not answer the first question because, in fact, he had attended in 1993 (along with Ken Clarke).

Apologies for the length of these postings. So much to cover.