CofE Covered In Blood And Gore

Mike Robinson

Jan 2nd 2009
No Comments
respond
trackback

According to Reuters a few days ago, the Church of England has invested £150 million with Generation Investment Management, a London based hedge fund owned by David Blood, ex-Goldman Sachs, and Al Gore, racist and genocidalist.

Al Gore is not a very nice guy. Certainly not someone any Christian should respect.

A Tennesee racist, his introduction into the political scene was with a seat in the US Congress – a reward for his part in the frame up of Morris Haddox, an African American political leader, who was trying to stop Nashville police from destroying his community by allowing unhindered narcotics trafficking and prostitution. This frame up was part of the FBI’s Operation Fruehmenschen (German for “early” or “primitive men”), in which black politicans and officials were illegally targeted and smeared, from the late 50’s until the mid 1970’s.

Gore’s  racism came to public notice in 1999, when he condemned millions of Africans to a lingering death by denying them access to generic Aids drugs. Never let a human life get in the way of making a profit, eh?

In more recent years, of course, Gore has been fighting his “Global Warming” crusade.

Gore claimed, for example, that Himalayan glaciers are shrinking and global warming is to blame. Yet the September 2006 issue of the American Meteorological Society’s Journal of Climate reported that this is only partly true. Gore claimed the snow on top of Mount Kilimanjaro was shrinking and that global warming was to blame. Yet according to the November 23 2003, issue of Nature magazine, “Although it’s tempting to blame the ice loss on global warming, researchers think that deforestation of the mountain’s foothills is the more likely culprit. Without the forests’ humidity, previously moisture-laden winds blew dry. No longer replenished with water, the ice is evaporating in the strong equatorial sunshine.”

Gore claimed global warming is causing more tornadoes. Yet the IPCC stated in February 2007 that there has been no scientific link established between global warming and tornadoes. Gore claimed global warming was causing more frequent and severe hurricanes. However, hurricane expert Chris Landsea published a study in May 2007 documenting that hurricane activity is no higher now than in decades past. Hurricane expert William Gray reported just a few days earlier, on 27th April 2007, that the number of major hurricanes making landfall on the U.S. Atlantic coast had declined in the past 40 years. Hurricane scientists reported in the 18th April Geophysical Research Letters that global warming enhances wind shear, which will prevent a significant increase in future hurricane activity. Gore claimed global warming was causing an expansion of African deserts. However, the 16th Sept, 2002, issue of New Scientist reported, “Africa’s deserts are in ’spectacular’ retreat … making farming viable again in what were some of the most arid parts of Africa.’”

So, we have a plethora of lies and half truths coming from the mouth of Al Gore. Why? For political reasons? Or was he planning, all along, the next great ponzi scheme? Does the Church of England not see the apparent conflict of interest here?

Generation Investment Management is a hedge fund. Its purpose is to make money for its owners and its clients. It is not philanthropic. It invests in global equities – it just so happens that its marketing niche is to buy and sell shares in companies with “green credentials.” Such as Nestle, that well known environmental and humanitarian corporation.

But global equity is not the end of it, because here comes the ponzi scheme – Carbon Credits. New financial engineering in the style of Mr Madoff, perhaps. A drivatives based tax on the world’s populations.

The day after The Inconvenient Truth won its Academy Award, the Tennessee Center for Policy Research reported that Al and his wife Tipper’s home electricity bills for one month were about equal to the annual electricity bills of an average American household. It’s OK, though, because he offsets this energy use with Carbon Credits – purchased from Generation.

Is this the sort of place the Church of England should have its money? Should the Church of England be contributing to Al Gore’s salary?

I don’t think so.


This post is tagged , , ,

No Responses to “CofE Covered In Blood And Gore”

  1. frank verismo says:

    Speaking with a theologian and lifelong christian friend recently he said: “the Church of England is going broke – and that’s a good thing”. Does make me wonder where exactly they got the £150 million from.

    As to Al Gore’s character, yesterday I came across this:

    “In 1991, Happer was appointed director of energy research for the US Department of Energy. In 1993, he testified before Congress that the scientific data didn’t support widespread fears about the dangers of the ozone hole and global warming, remarks that caused then-Vice President Al Gore to fire him. “I was told that science was not going to intrude on public policy”, he said. “I did not need the job that badly”.
    http://www.dailytech.com/Princeton+Physicist+Calls+Global+Warming+Science+Mistaken/article13773.htm

    ‘Science was not going to intrude on public policy’, eh? Can’t let the facts get in the way of an all-important global scam.

    Also from the Daily Tech:
    “Polls are clear. Despite the media’s increasingly shrill tone and ever-more unrealistic predictions, the public has lost all faith in global warming. After all, how many times can you say that this time the science is now finally proven, without being laughed at?

    In some respects, that’s good. It means less chance of implementing incredibly damaging policies, policies that will have disastrous impacts on standards of living, especially among the poor.

    In other ways, it’s bad. The overselling of inconclusive conjectures as “proven science” is leading some to distrust science itself. Given that, I think the year should conclude with a reminder of just what the scientific debate — minus its alarmist media trappings– is really all about.”

    This is an excellent point: arguing over the science does little to slow the advance of the Club of Rome’s agenda. Most of the science on the subject is valid and worthy. The problems arise when the data falls into the hands of agenda-driven demagogues. They have to remain our real target.

    • Wiggins says:

      Most of everything Al Gore comes out with is horses**t. Another Southern ‘Elite’ Family. This is as you say another scam to make money from the suckers. I think that they hope that when we are ‘potless’ we will starve to death, or accept their ‘Mark’.

  2. Welsh_messenger says:

    Neither the global warming scam nor the smoking ban (based on the premise that second hand smoke harms third parties) are based on irrefutable scientific evidence.

    The pillar supporting both is the precautionary principle. See http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=IdrgyTxjT7w and also http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=NJv03EHEcyU&feature=related

  3. Baron von Lotsov says:

    If you give money to Christian Aid, you are also funding Marxist global warming propaganda. Yes indeed, even though the pictures on the hype show starving Africans you are actually paying for deception and increases in poverty in your own country, especially amongst the poorest.

    So how on earth does this square with the Christian ethic? I mean, if they had actually read the Bible, they would have been warned about wolves in sheep’s clothing as the choice method Satan uses to lead people along the path to hell. How can they be so utterly stupid? I think the next time they come round with their collections I will tell them why they won’t be getting anything.

  4. Enufs Enuf says:

    2 Corinthians 11:13-15 (KJV)

    13For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming themselves into the apostles of Christ.

    14And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light.

    15Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works.

    Buckle up everyone – happy new year and don’t let Satan and his ‘little helpers’ grind you down, that IS his agenda after all….

  5. Biloxi says:

    BLOOD & GORE: Al has been sued by the owner of the Weather Channel as well as (last count) over 600 real scientists for his “fraud.”

    Speaking of CHRISTIAN:

    “Reckless Rites: Purim and the Legacy of Jewish Violence,” had a review written by Eliott Horowitz AND,

    It appears the memories of the Jews/Zionists is selective. Surprise, surprise.

    Selective memories to think that the persecution was the Jew/Zion clan.

    Rather than the truth: Christians were persecuted by Jews.

    Duh.

    Did not the story of Jesus already teach the true story?

    Nah, just like Blood & Gore, to rewrite history means a lot more of worshiping the GOLDEN CALF.

    Palestine is the continuance of the same agenda, since time began for this tribe of criminally insane – Zion.

    Websites in the US are blatant in their support of ZION. It is absolutely disgusting to find Jewish sites in abundance in the US, deliberately supporting a nation that kills indiscriminately as non-Christian.

    When Brian Gerrish demonstrated the hoax of GREEN, I did forensic investigation into the government websites in the US.

    THE TREASURERS for the States of Oregon and Washington (both “men” are the “new bioengineered endocrine” style in the US, btw), were selling the stocks by automatically replacing PENSIONS, with fake companies based in Texas,

    AND,

    the corporate entities were UK GREEN, faux entities.

    It has been ceased and desisted since the company in Texas was found to have sold the State of Minnesota a multi-billionaire dollar project that was nothing but a fake and Minnesota’s AG has sued the Texas company (does Bush live in TX?), for the return of its money.

  6. Tom Collins says:

    Trying to sort out the wheat from the chaff is well nigh impossible, with religion, politics or banking etc.

    However, what you CAN be sure of is that, at the end of the day, it ALL boils down to mo ney.

    So, to quote the old adage, “Follow The Money”.

    After all, that’s what the Illuminati is all about, plus the power that comes from extreme wealth.

    Look at the money grabbers, Blair, etc. and the money makers, R and R etc..

    A good researcher could explode the conspiracies..

  7. frank verismo says:

    Hello T.C. –

    “However, what you CAN be sure of is that, at the end of the day, it ALL boils down to mo ney.”

    Close – but when you have complete control over the money supply, as well as its ultimate value, money is obviously merely the means to an end. So what is that ‘end’.

    The standardization of the nations and their populations. For those holding the reins, diversity = unpredictability: that which the money masters fear most.

    The Arab nations know this perfectly well. They know first hand the real meaning of the word ‘globalisation’. It means a wholesale bulldozing of centuries of tradition and culture in order to assimilate them into the ‘fold’ – a fold they quite rightly see as godless and evil.

    Money is the means by which (highly) useful idiots – such as Blair – can be made to do the bidding of his monstrous masters.

    • The Editor says:

      With the notable exception of the House of Saud, which seems to gave thrown its hand in with the godless and evil.

  8. frank verismo says:

    “With the notable exception of the House of Saud, which seems to have thrown its hand in with the godless and evil.”

    Quite so. But if Lindsey Williams’ inside information is correct, that cosy and unholy relationship will soon end. According to his sources, the idea is to keep the price of oil as low as possible for as long as possible, ending Saudi/OPEC control. We shall see.

  9. John Morton says:

    I will be taking this up with my contacts within the Church and see if we can make some noise about this. The CofE is clearly barking up the wrong tree here both theologically and ethically.

    I do not necessarily agree that this is all the work of Satan, but more misguided intentions of the Oxbridge “lefty do-gooders” who tend to infest the institution more and more.

    I also happen to know where a lot of this is coming from as I know someone who works for the Cambrige Program for Industry – yet another unlected Prince of Wales Trust affiliated, semi-bureaoratic quango who have run “training programs” with Al Gore for senior CofE policy advisors like Clair Foster:

    http://www.churchpublishing.org/products/index.cfm?fuseaction=productDetail&productID=3340

  10. Tom Collins says:

    It appears obvious that the CoE is no better than the RCC !

    Both chase money (and power) although the RC are more successful with both !

    The religions of today bear no relation to the TRUTH outlined by Jesus, they’re just money-making corporations.

    Don’t forget that FEAR is the controller of the populace. Frighten the people sufficiently and they will agree to almost anything !

    Just look at the examples. Councils using the Terrorist Act to convict so-called dustbin villains ! ID cards for 60 million people in the UK to stop a handful of so-called terrorists.
    We had more trouble from the IRA. One could go on, and on, and on !!!

  11. Frances says:

    This is one reason why we came out of organised Church three years ago. We live in Germany, where the Lutheran Church is just the same as the CoE, but where the RCC is perhaps worse than it is in the UK, because it’s also the State Church here, as is the Luth.
    We just heard God say, ‘Come out of Babylon’, so we did.
    Painful process, but worth every moment for the spiritual gains we received..

    • John Morton says:

      In a sense I can see the logic here, but then, isnt that a bit like saying “because the British government and culture is corrupt, we should withdraw entirely and live in a bunker somewhere”.

      We won’t make any positive change in society unless we are willing to engage institutions and policy makers forcefully and from a position of informed strength.

      Fundamentally, man is a creature of reason, and it is in the field of intellectual debate and argument, of ideas, that we must conduct this war.

    • TimGF says:

      Frances – good on you! The real church is orgainised by God not man, so we “go to Him outside the camp”.

  12. Steven Hume says:

    Having carefully read the above comments, I will say that I have seldom seen a better advertisment for the cause of atheism.
    I suggest you all pause, have a cup of tea -and claim down.

    This may amuse: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/jan/06/religion-atheism

    See the article, then ask yourselves the question: Who drives the bus ?

    • John Morton says:

      Whatever your point is precisely, it is not particularly well made or germane.

      I see no reason to calm down as the central basis of this argument is that an institution that is supposed to be dedicated to the teaching and instruction of the people of this country in the works and ways of Jesus, now sees fit to engage in political propaganda and “investment” in carbon trading scams that will undoubtedly harm more people than so-called “global warming” ever will.

      But then, as a Guardian reader, I suppose you have been brainwashed into accepting that mankind is indeed causing this illusory “global warming”, along with its inbuilt atheistic sneer.

      p.s. I hope you are enjoying the cold weather, which, by the way, I predicted over 6 months ago upon reading a report by NASA stating that 2008 was a record year for no sunspot activity whatsoever. Funny that.

  13. Tom Collins says:

    Steven Hume recommends us to read The Guardian article on the atheist buses !
    Once you see that the main personalities (for want of a better word) are Polly Toynbee and Richard Dawkins, one can turn over and go back to sleep ! After all, these are the usual suspects, to coin a phrase. To spend money on advertising on buses merely to suggest that there is no God must be the biggest waste of money since Gordon Brown propped up the banks and building societies.

    These people suffer from bad advice. After all, do they really believe that a NEGATIVE advertising campaign still works ? Especially when they have no evidence; when God does !

  14. Steven Hume says:

    Actually, I read the Daily Telegraph….
    -and Richard Dawkins does not write for the Guardian.

    As to your other points: In a democratic society one is entitled to spend personal income as a matter of choice. It is a further choice as to what religion ( or none ) to practice.
    I assume that you still believe in free will ?

    oh, and exactly who are ” these people” ?

    -and we seem to have gone a long way from the orignal topic, which was a highly questionable slant against Al Gore ( who I assume is some sort of American ? ).
    Does this matter a jot to the UK ? er, No.

    • The Editor says:

      The slant is not questionable. It is, in fact, true.

      He is, without assumption, a US citizen. He is also, however, an advisor to the current UK government on “global warming”, and his hedge fund is based in London. So, if you had bothered to find out before commenting, it does, in fact, matter to the UK. Even a jot.

  15. Tom Collins says:

    I never said that Richard Dawkins writes for the Guardian ! But if The Guardian publishes anti-religious articles which are supported by dear old Polly Toynbee and fellow travellers such as Richard Dawkins, then we must treat them as coming from the same place !

    Of curse we have free will – for the moment. I can never understand why some people try to humiliate or ridicule religious believers (generally Christian ) and yet have nothing to offer in return ! I ne ver see Islam ridiculed in the press ! I wonder why ?

    • NOEL says:

      I never seen Islam ridiculed in the press

      Or the Babylonian Lucifer worshiping witches either I wonder why? What would happen if there was a campaign saying Satan doesn’t exist, they would be up in arms, so why should Christians accept it? Not everything is perfect in the Christian faith or C of E. Jesus teachings, and the scriptures I believe are God inspired yet most turn their backs on it. I wonder how many people will think about this when they realise they are leaving their children and grandchildren to be inheritors of the earth with the Lord of darkness?

  16. Steven Hume says:

    I think we are getting back to a consenus ( and I agree that Polly Toynbee is everyones favourite Aunt Sally – and these day she cops a clobbering each time she writes ).
    But you misunderstand the the reason why the Atheist Bus adverts were started.
    Many citizans do not take well to religion being pushed in their faces, and last years Christian bus messages did put the backs up a lot of folk ( as did much of the infamatory stuff on it`s website ).
    The resulting Atheist Bus cause is a rather British repost and a bit of fun as well.
    How you spin this into “.. humiliate or ridicule religious believers (generally Christian ) and yet have nothing to offer in return” – is beyond logic.
    No-one has mentioned Islam, only you.

    Now can we get things moving back to stopping CP, loss of constitutional rights and the mad-cap schemes of the Home Office ?
    Look at their website and see what they are planning to criminalise protest – which would include decent, blogs, the lot..

    Read http://www.henry-porter.com

    Be aware that a big and highly influential public conference is happening in London in Feb 2009. The best minds in the country will deliver speeches and presentations showing how Britain is becoming a police-state – and the ways in which we can all fight it. I would strongly urge everyone who posts here to attend and offer whatever support they can.

    -Details are on Henry Porter`s website.
    It`s not being organised by any political party.
    - Henry Porter is editor of Vanity Fair and for three years has thundered against the data-base state.

    • NOEL says:

      Your Conference Mr Hume seems to backed by the very people you say we should be fighting i.e. Common Purpose. Has anyone got any views on these articles?

      The Convention on Modern Liberty It is being sponsored by ROWNTREES openDemocracy, Liberty and the Guardian. Hosted by Henry Porter

      Common Purpose piloted ‘Local Links’ to improve neighbourhood networking, support, skills development and information sharing for local decision-makers and active citizens in four Yorkshire areas. The aim was to assist them to be better informed, empowered and more effective in their community roles. Produced for the ROWNTREE Foundation by COMMON PURPOSE – ref 2184

  17. NOEL says:

    As you appear by your postings to be an atheist you now have the nerve to say it was a bit of fun, maybe to you. As everything has to be politically correct, as not to offend anyone, perhaps Christians could sue, but I am sure they won’t.

    Before anyone gets involved in the Feb conference organised by Vanity Fair editor, Henry Porter, they should do some delving into the origins and management of this Magazine especially in America.

  18. Tom Collins says:

    It does appear that Stephen Hume is arguing for both sides !

    If you humiliate or ridicule someone, or something, you should have a reason for doing so. I merely asked the reason to be backed by evidence. Atheism versus Religion is really a non-starter.

    The Labour or Leftie contingent must have a clown to distract people. Since we’ve lost John Prescott, we’ll have to make do with Polly Toynbee. This is all planned. Keep the proletariat guessing and confused.”

    To condemn PC, CP and Jacqui Smith on the one hand and support the Lefties on the other, shows a confused state of mind !

  19. cheesy says:

    I most certainly will not be attending the Convention on Modern Biterly.
    What a load of poisonous hot air – never mind the burping cows, shut this lot up someone, please!
    I’m looking forward to our conference in Stoke. Less talk, more action, that’s what is needed.

  20. Steven Hume says:

    Well, I would love to refute some of the “head in the sand” views that have been expressed…But unfortunately, my last post has been stuck in moderation for an indecent period of time…

    As to the London conference, attending and listening is not a licence to surrender individual views.
    It would certainly be a place to find allies.
    -and I would have liked to have seen the anti CP movement find expression at a major public event, even if it were a fringe meeting.

    • NOEL says:

      Yes Mr Hume for those of us on the fringe it does seem a bit like David and Goliath. but that analogy can only be good.

  21. NOEL says:

    At risk of stating the obvious, Could this mean?

    Illuminist/Zionist owned media i.e. Vanity Fair = Henry Porters double bluff = Modern Liberty scam.

  22. Steven Hume says:

    Noel,

    You really need to get out more…Has it occured to you that you might possibly be wrong.

    Not everything is a conspiracy, you know ?

    • NOEL says:

      Calm down , Just found this article it sums it all up very well I am glad I am not the only one with these views.
      Foxes organise Liberty for Chicken, Modern Liberty.
      Hah Hah

  23. Steven Hume says:

    er, barking ?

    • NOEL says:

      After well composed postings I am sorry to see you are reduced to this sparse comment, er, barking. Don’t take it so personal, but I can see how er, barking … you must feel by the negative comments to your postings.
      Foxes arrange liberty for chicken Modern Liberty. Blogdial. Web site.

  24. serra says:

    The C of E has totally lost it. Go to any service especially in a Cathedral and hear the priest droning on about giving to the third world and trying to send the entire congregation on a guilt trip.
    Funding the third world is like throwing water in a well. Its fuelling a human breeding programme on a hitherto unknown scale and there is not enough food and land for so many people. If only the church would fund family planning I would support them. I am against abortion but there is a place for say having only 2-4 children instead of the 19 or so popped out by mama Africa and mama Islam.
    There are some really good C of E churches and they have excellent (right wing) priests but the overall thrust is weak and watery socialism and appeasement of(sic Islam etc)at any cost.

  25. Ruth Allan says:

    As we move, seemingly inexorably, towards a world government, perhaps it would be a good idea by all those of us who have a faith to find out what religion the United Nations has planned for us all – no exceptions. Google UN lucis trust maitreya. And find out the names of all the UN luminaries who back this weirdness.

    All that business with the Blairs and Carol Kaplan is no isolated nuttiness. For example – what is that old murderer Kissinger up to at the Vatican?

    • NOEL says:

      We cant condemn others when so much needs to be put right in our own Churches. The Christian Zionist Alpha courses run by many churches of all denominations has been criticised by many Christians. It seems the Alpha Course is having the effect they intended. Christians have become indifferent to fighting evil but are accepting it as part of their destiny along with the Jews in hurrying the destruction of humanity in line with Bible prophesies
      There are some interesting links.

      Beware of the Alpha Course!
      Perhaps the preachers and evangelists who have endorsed this course need to take a longer look at their Bibles. Jesus NEVER laid hands on his disciples, the result of which were “manifestations” of uncontrollable laughter, mayhem, shaking, animal noises, vomitting, or any of the other demonic disorder of the Toronto and Brownsville “things”. Luis Palau, of all people, had better wake up to this deception that is sweeping the churches of Europe and is now being used around the world.
      For a good critique on the dangers of this course, visit this web site:
      “The Alpha Course” by Chris Hand
      http://www.banner.org.uk/misc/alpha.html

  26. Edward Spalton says:

    I am involved with the constitutional struggle for independence and have been for many years; some of you may know of me. I have caught up with this article rather late and would like to comment from a religious viewpoint. I am the most junior sort of minister in my Church.

    . The Church of England is so doctrinally comprehensive as to mean anything to anybody.. It is not only the Evangelical/Catholic split (which always existed) but the “modernist”/traditionalist groups and even New Age “spirituality” and “Sea of Faith” atheism which are included. Clergy of these persuasions all draw stipends from the contributions of the faithful. Roman Catholic and Non-Conformist Churches have similar problems.

    I recently attended a meeting of that excellent organisation, the Christian Institute which has qualified researchers and lawyers looking at the increasing flood of anti-Christian legislation, much of it coming from the EU. A question was asked “What are the mainstream Churches doing to support you?” The organisers answered that many people from these Churches were supporting them but they avoided the matter of INSTITUTIONAL support because (presumably) there is none. The hierarchies mostly remain silent.

    The Christian Institute (www.christian.org.uk is an Evangelical Protestant organisation and I am a (non Roman, Orthodox ) Catholic but have no hesitation in supporting them financially and by writing to MPs and peers as one of the very few effective campaigning groups for traditional Christianity. I heartily recommend people to get onto their mailing list to find out what persecutions are in store for us and how to use every lawful method of defence against them.

  27. NOEL says:

    It’s good to hear there are people fighting these issues. Those intent on the destruction of Christianity know they cannot appear to demolish it outright. But with insidious introduction of New Age ideals Alpha and much more they hope to obtain their goal. I read somewhere that it only needs a few people to stay true to the God of the Bible. Will it be these people who in the future remain to build the Church, which will only become more powerful? We can only do what we can and hope that people will soon wake up and see the cause as to why a lot of lives today are reduced to a hell on earth.

    There is a good web site Powers behind the Alpha course with thirty three pages of links. Jesuits, Freemasons the lot how can any decent church run on the principles of these organisations.

  28. Mark Welsh says:

    Japan: CLIMATE CHANGE IS BOGUS! THIS IS EXPLOSIVE FOLKS! :-)

    Western media completely ignores major report from Japan’s Energy Commission

    Friday, Feb 27th, 2009

    A major scientific report by leading Japanese academics concludes that global warming is not man-made and that the overall warming trend from the mid-part of the 20th Century onwards has now stopped.

    Unsurprisingly the report, which was released last month, has been completely ignored by the Western corporate media.

    The report was undertaken by Japan Society of Energy and Resources (JSER), the academic society representing scientists from the energy and resource fields.

    The JSER acts as a government advisory panel, much like the International Panel on Climate Change did for the UN.

    The JSER’s findings provide a stark contrast to the IPCC’s, however, with only one out of five top researchers agreeing with the claim that recent warming has been accelerated by man-made carbon emissions.

    The government commissioned report criticizes computer climate modeling and also says that the US ground temperature data set, used to back up the man-made warming claims, is too myopic.

    In the last month, no major Western media outlet has covered the report, which prompted British based sci-tech website The Register to commission a translation of the do$%^&ent.

    Section one highlights the fact that Global Warming has ceased, noting that since 2001, the increase in global temperatures has halted, despite a continuing increase in CO2 emissions.

    The report then states that the recent warming the planet has experienced is primarily a recovery from the so called “Little Ice Age” that occurred from around 1400 through to 1800, and is part of a natural cycle.

    The researchers also conclude that global warming and the halting of the temperature rise are related to solar activity, a notion previously dismissed by the IPCC.

    “The hypothesis that the majority of global warming can be ascribed to the Greenhouse Effect is mistaken.” the report’s introduction states.

    Kanya Kusano, Program Director and Group Leader for the Earth Simulator at the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science & Technology (JAMSTEC) reiterates this point:

    “[The IPCC's] conclusion that from now on atmospheric temperatures are likely to show a continuous, monotonic increase, should be perceived as an unprovable hypothesis,”

    Shunichi Akasofu, head of the International Arctic Research Center in Alaska, cites historical data to challenge the claim that very recent temperatures represent an anomaly:

    “We should be cautious, IPCC’s theory that atmospheric temperature has risen since 2000 in correspondence with CO2 is nothing but a hypothesis. ”

    “Before anyone noticed, this hypothesis has been substituted for truth… The opinion that great disaster will really happen must be broken.” Akasofu concludes.

    The conclusions within the report dovetail with those of hundreds of Western scientists, who have been derided and even compared with holocaust deniers for challenging the so called “consensus” on global warming.

    The total lack of exposure that this major report has received is another example of how skewed coverage of climate change is toward one set of hypotheses.

    This serves the agenda to deliberately whip up mass hysteria on behalf of governments who are all too eager to introduce draconian taxation and control measures that won’t do anything to combat any form of warming, whether you believe it to be natural or man-made.

    The Register’s report: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/02/25/jstor_climate_report_translation/

  29. AP Byrne says:

    With the exception of the editor, it is quiet obvious that most of the comments on this site are from people who are still “Mind Controlled” by Religion irrespective of which of them you belong to, this is also reflected in most of your stance on Poliitical Parties, and all seem to be confused, when it comes to differentiation between between the following tags, on Democracy, Socialism,Marxism, and what we are now in the grip of “Fascism”,you are all still living in the make belief world which has been produced by your selves, and still have no idea of what is going on around you,
    all I can say is if I may use the term God help us all if we have to depend on the people who frequent these blogs, and I do not know how the editor has the paitence or for that matter waste his energy answering you all