You can bet that the UK will be the last to leave – as always. And that will cost us dear – much more than Daisy Brown could borrow !

We need a REAL campaign to get us out – FIRST !

http://www.stuartwheeler.co.uk/11feb.pdf

Notice section 8 for example.

“[r]atification is a step taken on the international plane, and is not governed by domestic law nor operative at the level of domestic law”

So that is how they do it. They make international law govern domestic law, and so our country has no redress to its own courts. In layman’s terms I think that means we have given up our power. We therefore have to do this the hard way, and it needs to be done politically. It’s where the real power resides, and supersedes all form of government and law.

If enough people are against the EU then it simply cannot operate. It becomes a physical impossibility, and the laws of physics govern any man-made law. The EU is totally aware of this, it is their Achilles heel, and they bend over backwards to try and garner the support of the 500 million they also tell what to do. It’s a confidence trick.

The capability of the environment to support any population is directly proportional to the level of tecnology available to us. Our ability to feed, clothe, warm and transport ourselves is reliant on our willingness to embrace the latest technologies.

So, for example, in the past, our populations were relatively small, because we used wood as the source of heat, and we had poor agricultural capability, poor diet, poor medicine. As we learned more about the universe, we discovered wind. Coal, oil and gas allowed us to discover steam power and electricity. We made advances in agriculture and medicine, and our poplations took a bigger step as a result.

Pollution is a choice that we make, generally as a result of an unwillingness by profiteering corporations to invest in developing technological solutions to the problem.

The idea that cities get “too full” is another load of nonsense. Cities can feel too full, because we lack the necessary basic infrastructure to make being there pleasant. So trains never run on time, streets and subway tunnels are too narrow, the air is dirty, the streets are smelly and so on.

None of these problems is population related. They are technology and economy related as a result of the choices we make through our unwillingness to fight the results of the finance led corporate attitudes of our society.

And so we are at a point where the population is huge relative to our capability to support it. We are allowing our power, water, agriculture and medical capability to collapse, while the top 1% in terms of income loot whatever’s left. This can only end one way, and that might be something you would like to see, but not me. And, by the way, it won’t just be African, Asian and South American nations which suffer.

Ever since the last World War and the Stalinist period, any mention of population control or reduction in the Western World has engendered ignoramus retorts and accusations such as ‘Nazi! That has nothing whatsoever to do with a sensible programme of ‘passive’, I repeat, ‘passive’, population reduction on which the future wellbeing of human communities may ultimately rest.

If we want to muck around with Nature and our planet, then we have to give something in return, which is to voluntarily reduce our numbers over time to create a natural balance between us, our planet and the sustainable landmasses it provides. The end result will be ‘quality of life’ rather than ‘quantity of life’. If you all support the first, some will survive and survive well and on into the future. If you don’t and stay with the second, then we’ll all eventually go down the tube. Take your pick – now’s the time to make an important decision.

The EU is seemingly looking to build up large populations within ’slave’ nations. Nothing could more clearly highlight the greed and selfish ambitions of today’s politicians and the increasing imbalances between populations and sustainable landmasses. The policy of roping in another country or two into the EU to serve as fresh ‘bread baskets’ will only prolong the eventual and inevitable, which is mass starvation and pollution-based sickness on a frightening scale.

Most politicians thrive on encouraging and supporting population growth: It provides resources that increase potentials for votes, taxation and other government sources of revenue, much to be spent on things that don’t enhance our conditions or future human prospects. For example: Why are there State benefit incentives for teenage pregnancies at the expense of tax payers? That’s mindless!

For the scientific, mathematical realities that support these comments please go to http://www.Optimumpopulation.org which will help you come to grips with the central, fundamental realities on which the pollution problem, and our future chances of survival, really rest.

Happy Christmas to you all,

JR

You can get cheap trains to Birmingham, but it’s much more expensive to Stoke, and involves a change of trains. Also, to get to the conference on time you’d have to leave at the crack of dawn from Newcastle Central station, and many people live at some distance from the city/city centre, which adds even more time to the journey.

I shall manage to get there, but only by getting a train down the day before, and staying in Birmingham overnight. I’m still hoping to persuade at least two or three other people to come, but at the moment it seems a forlorn hope. Unfortunately, the only way of ensuring a big contingent from this area would probably have been to lay on transport.

I know what you mean about picking up on things with the best intentions. We all do it, and that’s why this site is open to comments. I for one really appreciate all the comments left here – I like my view of the world being challenged, no matter how uncomfortable it feels sometimes.

“This new Rome has not been built by amateurs.” Absolutely. But where I applaud people like John Harris is that they are willing to put their own lives on the line to find out just how tied by their own rules government/establishment is. As for Maynard, I know he makes some videos, but I don’t know if he actually does anything. He was a stand up comedian in a previous incarnation, wasn’t he? I wonder sometimes if some of these people just do this stuff as a new angle on their careers.

I’m not suggesting John Harris himself is some kind of KGB, but what often happens is people pick up on these things with the best of intentions, as seeing it as a way out of the situation. The thing is though, this new Rome has not been built by amateurs, and it stands to reason that any body of power holds that power because of its abilities. They put up a puppet show on the box to fool us, but behind the scenes it is really a severe fortress, with no unguarded back doors to it. That’s not to say we can’t defeat it, and their biggest problem is that there are far more people being exploited than people who feed from it.

So a conference is an excellent thing and it cheers me up to see talk form into organised resistance. I do also think that this resistance is actually better when it is very ad hoc. I think it is most healthy to have many different organisations all attracting different people and all trying to solve the problems in their unique ways. It’s back to that Darwinian selection business I suppose. Bio-diversity is much stronger than only one dominant species, as it was in the Politburo. I think this is what is taking place among the small anti-EU parties. They all fight it out, but out of that soup will be a new super species of anti-EU politics to take them on with.

I’ll see if I can make it anyway, although I’m some distance from Stoke.

The purpose of the conference is, as you say, to get people organised.

I don’t know much about the freeman stuff, so I can’t comment on that. However, John Harris is a personable guy, and if you choose to come to the conference – you are coming, aren’t you(!) – he will answer any questions you have without insult or accusation.

Mike.

It’s definitely good to have a conference and get organised, but I’d be a little wary of the Freeman business if I were you. I’m not a lawyer, but I understand a little about it, as I have had to defend myself and others in court from time to time. To me it looks like a scam, and we must be careful to make sure that all information is checked and tested.

I have seen how the crooks in government play their games, and one thing they are very good at is to set up a strawman argument. Some strawman arguments would include things like windmills kill lots of birds-> windmills are bad. Another one is that ID cards wont work because the technology will fail. These sorts of arguments are deliberately infused into the opposition movement, and well meaning people who are not, lets say, expert in their subject, think that it would be a good argument to use. This is then followed by, maybe the BBC taking up that argument and reinforcing it, like saying protestors claim that this is the reason they are so bad. Then the idea eventually fails and resentment sets in against the people who are seen to have tricked them into believing something that has since made them look a bit stupid.

So on that basis I have been questioning one or two self-proclaimed Freemen and they have been having problems answering my questions. The main one is to ask them why this supposed piece of law had been entirely neglected by the legal profession, and how do they claim to be more expert than all of these people. As per usual, the response was to come out with insult and accuse me of working for the system and so forth. No answer was forthcoming, and these people pushing it had the signature of con artists. Use long complicated words, use of emotionally charged statements, never specific, never backed up with cases won or lost and so on. I asked had any QC endorsed it. Answer: “No”.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=FfHW7KR33IQ

“Carbon Trading”, “carbon footprint” and “carbon taxes” are all towards a complete scam of a tax on breathing and another use of ‘fear’ to promote cognitive dissonance in the unawakened and unaware sheople who still believe anything their so called ‘government’ tells them. Keep the sheople dependent upon oil whilst telling them that this habit they refuse to ‘kick’ will kill them, their children and their planet……it’s just plain evil and sadly very effective – until now.

“You shall know them by their fruit” ie MONEY.

Matthew 23:25-27

25Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter, but within they are full of extortion and excess.

26Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also.

27Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.

Read the whole passage here – especially the part about PENSIONS!:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?book_id=47&chapter=23&version=9

There is nothing and no-one that these traitors, common thieves and criminals wouldn’t use to retain the ’status quo’ over humanity – this includes taking the name of The Creator (not merely his ‘architect’) and subsequently our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ in vain.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/driving/jeremy_clarkson/article5292547.ece