A few weeks ago, I interviewed Tim Alexander, the Earl of Stirling. Lord Stirling was directly involved in the Cash for Honours scandal, having submitted evidence to the Metropolitan Police investigation under John Yates. He has written a book (“Cash for Peerages: The Smoking Gun”) on the subject, which is available from Lulu Press (www.lulu.com).
Introductions
JM: I am sure you will agree that it is quite ironic for an American to be talking to a Brit about hereditary titles.
LS: [Laughs] Yes, well, as an American I don’t take the issue of hereditary honours too seriously, except in as far as this is part of my family history and traditions going back centuries, as outlined in my book. In my time working with Burke’s Peerage I became an expert on Scots Peerage Law, Baronetage Law, Baronage Law and Chiefly Law. This knowledge about the law is reflected in my complaint against Blair, Lord Falconer and now Brown and Straw.
JM: You may be aware of the work of the UK Column and our fight against Common Purpose, which we suspect of being a Masonic conspiracy at the higher levels. Care to comment?
LS: Common Purpose certainly sounds like a front group to me. When you want to know where the real power resides in a given country, and those who you ask always speak in a very quiet, hushed voice about something – that tells you who the powers really are. Your goals are certainly admirable and I support you in them, but you really do have your work cut out for you, what with police cameras everywhere (one for every seven citizens; more than in the rest of Europe combined) and the rapid drive towards a police state in Great Britain. You know I call this period we are in now “The Quickening”, and I think that sums it up quite nicely.
The “smoking gun”
JM: Given the circumstances you outline in your book, I am sure you are familiar with the original cash for honours case that led to the introduction of the law against this in the UK. Would you agree that Lord Levy appears to be the reincarnation of John Maundy-Gregory in this respect?
LS: That would have been under the Lloyd George government, correct? Yes, well I don’t have any specific evidence to support this, but Levy certainly looks like a Mossad operative to me. At the bare minimum he should be considered as a key overlord and handler for NuLabour and Tony Blair. He can only really be described is a kind of shifty snake-oil salesman who speaks with a “forked tongue”, if you know what I mean.
JM: And what about Peter Mandelson who you will note just (re)ascended the giddy heights?
LS: Well, aside from the fact that in my opinion Mr Mandelson is an order of magnitude worse than someone like Karl Rove, I would say that these people are just so utterly corrupt and smack in the middle of this whole stinking business up-to their eyebrows that after a while they begin to think they are invincible, and just develop this unbelievably arrogant attitude towards the world around them.
I see the whole cash-for-honours scandal as a form of over-reach arising from this pompous and inflated opinion that they have of themselves. When Baron Mandelson was ennobled, he had two people with him: Baroness Jay of Paddington (who is a really lovely lady), and Lord Falconer. Now I could rant about that fat b****d Falconer all day – he has done more than the rest of them put together to undermine and besmirch the integrity of British politics and constitutional processes, and to destroy as much of British heritage as possible.
If you take my case alone, the fact that we are talking about crimes including obstruction of justice means that it should be sufficient to put at least one senior cabinet minister in prison for a significant number of years, so this is a serious level of corruption that we are talking about here. I don’t like to get too bent out of shape about them really, at the end of the day they will eventually have to face their creator and all the tea-and-crumpets-with-the-pope in the world won’t help them on that day! If nothing else, just take a look at the slaughter they have caused in Iraq and other parts of the world with their policies. These things really do require an accounting if we are going to move forward from here and build a better world free from all this senseless bloodshed.
JM: The impression I got from your book was that it was somewhat rushed to print to coincide with the political events, as opposed to being a detailed account of your legal case, is that a fair statement?
LS: Yes, that is more or less what happened. I wanted to ensure that my story was part of the public record, but as political events were moving very fast it was a bit of a rush job to get the book out.
JM: Further to that, while I think that there is clear circumstantial evidence for corruption presented in your book, I was not entirely satisfied that you had proved your case to the extent required to prove criminal wrongdoing. Do you have other evidence that was not presented in the book?
LS: In the end I did leave quite a lot of things out and have been deliberately circumspect in certain areas for a variety of reasons that I prefer not to discuss at this point in time. But, as you should know from the book, I followed Scots peerage law to the tee and obviously know it extremely well, so there is absolutely no question but that the ongoing obstruction of my rightful position as a peer is against the law of the land. The Labour government even failed to follow their own legal guidelines as laid out in the Royal Warrant, establishing the Roll of the Peerage, that was issued by Lord Falconer, supposedly to clear up problems caused by their half-assed reform of the House of Lords, so you might observe that their incompetence and clownishness is almost as accomplished as their capacity for wanton corruption.
As you will no doubt be aware, these type of characters do not exactly just come right out and send you an invoice for whatever it is they want from you, but instead make subtle “suggestions” over an informal chat that perhaps all your “problems” will just go away if you can bring yourself to make a “reasonable donation”. In fact, the “problems” they refer to do not exist in the real world under the legal system they should be following, but seem to just spontaneously appear out of nowhere when their expectations are not met.
Now I am a Christian and an ethical person, and I don’t think that paying bribes to politicians is really the way a first world country should be conducting its political affairs, and that applies to the United States, the United Kingdom and anywhere else that claims to be a bastion of ethics and good governance. So you can call me stubborn if you want, and I am sure these guys have a few other things they would like to call me in addition to that [laughing] but, that’s the way I see things and I know I am right about this.
A key point is that Tony Blair’s defense of his actions, and the actions of his senior people, in the “cash for peerages” scandal was that the peerages in question were not “honours” in the traditional sense but working party positions. My case, that involved both a possible life peerage and old hereditary Scottish peerages (something clearly a matter of traditional honours even under Blair’s very liberal definition of “honours” used in his defense) clearly proved that the actions of Blair and his most senior people were corrupt. They would not follow the law unless and until they received a massive “donation”.
I do not pay bribes, and they caused me no untold amount of problems because of this. To this every day, the Labour government, now under Brown (and with the personal involvement of Jack Straw as Justice Minister and Lord Chancellor) refuse to follow Scots Peerage Law in my case. They still have not placed my name on the Roll of the Peerage in spite of the fact that the circumstances of my claim, under Scots Peerage Law and the rules outlined by the Royal Warrant establishing the Roll of the Peerage, clearly legally require them to do so. In my case, there is even written documents from Falconer’s senior people lying about the wording of a recent Act of Parliament. When I proved their written statement to be a lie, there was no apology. When I caught them quoting English Peerage Law rules instead of the different Scots Peerage Law rules in my claim to Scots Peerages and pointed this out several times there was no apology, just a continuation of same. The flow of communication from the senior law officer in the land, at that time, the then Lord Chancellor Lord Falconer, when a case was before the European Court of Human Rights, clearly established that they were committing obstruction of justice.
JM: In your opinion, why was the investigation shut down and what should we, the British public be doing about that? In particular, I am curious about the role of Detective Inspector John Yates, who is a name we have come across recently in connection with charges of treason that are being made around the country on our initiative – do you think he is corrupt or merely under enormous pressure by higher ups in the establishment.
LS: I personally talked at length with John Yates and with his senior detectives. They had, let me make this very clear, they had more than enough evidence, just from my case alone, to bring criminal charges against some of the highest office holders in the land. But the “fix was in”. The Establishment did not want a PM and senior cabinet ministers going to Her Majesty’s Prisons, so the deal reached was Blair was to resign by a certain date and no criminal charges would be brought against anyone in the Cabinet or Number 10.
JM: What is the next move for your fight over this issue and what are the prospects for success?
LS: Well the first thing to say is that under Scots Law I am the Earl of Stirling, and nothing, even the mighty New Labour, can change that. As it stands I am free to bring a very substantial lawsuit against Falconer, Blair and Straw which I am very confident would be sufficient to bankrupt all concerned.I do not like to make money off lawsuits, but this after all is a matter of principle.
To be frank, I was quite put off by the whole process – it simply was not what one would expect from the UK as a first world country. So basically I just want the British government to follow the law, including international treaties to which the UK is a signatory, not to mention their much lauded manifesto commitments to gender equality (which is a key part of my case in view of the ridiculous and obsolete law of male primogeniture).
I believe there was a bill by Lord Diamond related to this not so long ago, which I did not think was too well put together and unfortunately was subsequently defeated in House of Lords. They probably think I am a boy scout but I am damned if I am going to pay them to do things they are supposed to do anyway. I don’t pay bribes, but since they are forcing the issue by continuing not to follow the law, I will bring legal action against the personal assets of several senior Labour officials under human rights legislation; there are a number of countries in the EU and in North America that claim “universal jurisdiction” in the case of human rights violations and also allow people to go after the government officials regardless of their governmental or Crown immunity and to go after their personal assets. They themselves valued a life barony/peerage at over one million pounds, this was their going rate for “donations” for a life peerage.
As my case involves one possible life barony, one hereditary earldom, two viscounties, two Scots Lordships of Parliament, a baronetcy, a chiefship of a Scottish clan, several hereditary great offices of state in Canada and Nova Scotia, and several other titles the claim is apt to be very very high. This is NOT something that I want to have to take to court but I will not allow the crooks to win. I supplied them with hundreds of years of my ancestry in my claim by right but they don’t care about this, they just want money. The current refusal to follow Scots Peerage Law in my claim by Jack Straw and Gordon Brown ties them into the Blair Cash for Peerages scandal in a on-going way. Further, the refusal to allow a resettlement-by-letters patent to eliminate the sexist rules of male primogeniture, with regards to the succession to my titles, something which under Scots Peerage Law is my right to formally request, is a basic violation of human rights of myself, my sister, and her heirs and ties Straw and Brown into the past obstruction of justice issue that was before the European Court of Human Rights.
It is downright shameful to insist on maintaining odious sexist rules of male only succession to the Earldom of Stirling/etc. when Scots Peerage law allows the present Earl, myself, the right to have the Monarch change these rules. It is Jack Straw and Gordon Brown who are standing in the way of ending this gender based human rights violation. The fact that they do so in opposition to the strong support for gender equality that the Labour Party supposedly stand for, is sadly reflective of their duplicity on gender and human rights issues.
The British Constitution
JM: We are particularly interested in the constitutional issues involved with the “cash for honours” scandal. In particular you may have head the recent case of the 22 MPs who want to abandon their oath to the Monarch and are pushing for Constitutional reform to make Great Britain a “Republic”.
LS: One of the most beautiful things about the UK is that you have managed to keep your heritage, and this is apparent to anyone who visits the country and can feel that kind of living history all around them. It really would be a bad thing to have one more semi retired corrupt politician appointed as head of state. The UK has the benefit of being separated from the continent and did not lose its monarchy at the end of World War 1 like other European nations, and this was a good thing in my opinion. In all my dealings with the British Royal family I have found them fair and have no complaint whatsoever against them, and so I wholeheartedly believe that the country should keep it’s Monarchy as an institution regardless of all the many scandals and intrigues, and marriage problems, around the Windsor family in recent years.
Economic Crisis
JM: There has been a lot of discussion and speculation on the internet about the crisis being a kind of “economic 9/11″. Do you agree with this perspective, and if so, who primarily do you think is behind it?
LS: Hmm. Well it’s quite an interesting co-incidence to see that the Rockerfeller and Rothschild interests have so far seemed to have done quite well out of all this chaos. There was also the recent case of this interesting “car accident” in Austria of a “far right” political figure who was raising the issue of the global banking families, which really is the 3rd rail in all of this. You know I often get emails attacking me for not being anti-semitic by saying that “the Jews” are responsible for all this in the articles that I write, but I simply refuse to blame an entire race of people for what some people try to do. Nonetheless, it is rather interesting to note that Lady Rothschild is a key fundraiser for the Tory party. The Rothschilds have been at the game of backing both sides of every major conflict for hundreds of years, and while their basic methodology is always to make money and accrue more and more political power, there is a broader agenda. Panics and crashes always benefit a small group of “insiders”, and if you look at the Great Depression this was the greatest generator of debt to the bankers on record, and it seems clear enough that fractional reserve banking goes together with wars as the biggest generator of deficit spending.
JM: What do you see as the primary solutions that are required at this point in time, and do you have any specific advice to our readers on that?
LS: I don’t have any simple answers to that one. What I do see coming is truly horrific economic conditions, and a global war. And given that this is the 21st Century, we are no longer talking about regular warfare. If you take the case of Iran, which clearly has an advanced bio-war MAD capability via genetically engineered viruses we really are looking at something that approximates the horrific scenes described in the Biblical accounts of Armageddon. What is coming in the short term certainly seems to provide the casus belli for the installation of the global fascist police state that is so clearly the agenda of these evil people.
Conclusion
JM: In closing, do you have any other remarks or points that you would like to draw to the attention of our readers?
LS: Ok, well the essential point to remember is that my case could have put Blair and Falconer in prison and it has not ended yet. Jack Straw (Brown’s Justice Minister and Lord Chancellor) is still not following the law and therefore I am not going to let this matter rest. They have tried very hard to sweep this under the rug but it is not going away. I have nothing to lose at this point in my life, so we will see in the end if justice prevails.
JM: Thank-you for your time this evening and God bless.
LS: Thank-you.
This post is tagged Cash For Honours, Corruption, NuLabour
Double WOW. Recently I read The Earl of Sterling, and his assessment of this 21st Century (global war, MAD, etc.). It was by and far the most accurate rendition of what is at the core and what this means to the whole. I continue to be moved closer and closer to the “harvesting” idea since these so-called “evil” and “rich” do not appear to be bothered by the fact that they do what they do with full immunity and impunity, too.
May I suggest that people also read the article by Christopher Bollyn: How Mossad Controls our Political Parties.
In my view perhaps this countries major problem!
http://www.bollyn.info/home/articles/euhispol/how-zionists-control-britain/
Can someone also explain to me why the Queen/Buckingham Palace has deemed it necessary to bestow a honary Knighthood on the Israeli President Shimon Peres.
What great thing(s) has he done besides helping to make the life of the Palestinians a complete hell.
Hi Peter
Pretty simple really, Zionism is a front for the Inner City banking cartel. Mossad is just the assassin squad for British intelligence. It goes back to the Khazars who are the thirteenth tribe,. Attila the Hun had a child with one of the Roman bloodlines daughters and thus the bloodline we know as the Rothschild’s and the Askenazim Talmud Jews, better known as the pretend Jews by the Sephardic jews…
Give this page a study peter and you will be fully informed
PS probably a good idea if i gave you the link ehh:
http://lifeinthemix2.co.uk/ISRAEL.html
Thanks Life. Some of this I already knew but by no means all of it. Will read the link (more than once) at my leasure. Cheers.
HI All.
This was a good interview until he lorded praise for the Royal family. An Earl he may be but informed he most certainly is not, or of course he is one of the naughty boys. Such a shame I held a bit of hope there for a while we had a powerful allie..
It looks more and more like we are going to have to have a bloody revolution in this nation, something the North is certtainly ready for , This is the frightening aspect to all this, if we cannot get sensible people on board , then they are all going to die a pretty horrible death…Try a visit to salford if you want proof of this, they haver more weaponry than the US military… …
Yes, the hope is the people are going to grow weary and then take up the axe. How perfect for the predators who always love a good slaughter. Why not simply stop spending any money and it won’t take long for the revolution to do what it really and truly should: freeze the free food to the cannibals. “Commoners” gather together in groups and strike as coalitions. No money for the ZIONISTs’ (cannibals) anti-Goyim schemes anymore. Henry Makow is a very brave genuine Jew who is shinning the light on it all. Let’s face it the world is not going to be FREE until the abomination of Palestine is accepted as the high crime against humanity for the cannibalistic barbarism that it clearly is. We must all demand Palestine be freed, then and only then are we going to face the fact that the Zionists created a headquarters to rule the world through the acts of preying upon our own species for the pure and simple fact that it could be done and the world (GB/UK, Europe, US, of course ISRAEL, et al.) all partook in this 60 plus year slaughter of innocent people. Our humanity is a wolf at the door now, for us all to howl, so the Palestinians can be heard, too?
I don’t think the Queen has that much power to be honest. She has to toe the line like everyone else. You see, conventional conspiracy theory would have you believe the Queen is ‘one of them’, but I have suspected all is not so great in the House of Windsor for a long time.
Indeed the Queen has been speaking out in the last few years. She hated the Blair’s when they visited and said they knew nothing about the country way of life. She is not in the least bit happy about the foxhunting ban. On smoking she said she always offers her guests an ashtray at Buckingham Palace and refused to put up no smoking signs. Recently when visiting the LSE she asked why no one had seen the recession coming and got a pack of idiotic lies back when she told them it was “awful”. Basically she did not buy their theory that it was just everyone copied the opinion of everyone else. Another time my MP resigned his job as a minister to protest over joining the Euro and a few months later the Queen made him a life member of the Privy Council. So you see the Queen is not such a bad person, even though the BBC tried to smear her and fake the documentary they did. Also she has spoken her mind on the disgusting ‘modern art’ produced by Marxists of the Frankfurt School.
A friend of mine with aristocratic family connections in Malta met the Queen twice on her recent visit as she was invited to some private receptions on board one of Her Majesty’s ships. She told me the Queen was the most perfect example of what one should be! Really though, I don’t think she has done anything evil and there are other aristocrats who equally try and do their best for society. Why would Blair have tried to get rid of hereditary peers otherwise? Take a look at Lord Monckton for example. He’s not exactly ‘on message’.
Sadly Baron – imho ‘Her Madge’ is guilty by association – one of those ‘associations’ being that of my MP Ken Clarke being a Bilderberger and Privvy Councillor……
Years ago and in naivity I might have perhaps referred to that as an innocent ‘conflict of interest’ and perhaps an ‘oversight’ on the part of Ken to report it as such. On the other hand – when one accepts the control mechanism we know as the ‘illuminati’/synagogue of satan then we understand that there is no ’slip up’ about such interests.
“All the world’s a stage and all the men and women merely players”.
When one understands that the world IS being run as a giant production for those who are still ‘asleep’ and that the object of that production is the total control of everything down to the last blade of grass, one can begin to throw off the chains of tyranny that have bound humanity for far too many millenia.
Here’s a new article from a great site which explains in more details about ‘them’:
The Cabal’s New Strategies
http://www.hermes-press.com/CNS_index.htm
and here’s part 1 of a 2 x 10′ part video I just watched this morning – the voice over needs some concentration but combine the script with the images and the essence of who, what and why ‘they’ do what they do is skillfully exposed:
American Show p1 – warning, graphic images of war casualties
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=rGa_rt0U50U
Of course, the original tyrant in the Bible is Satan and his ‘little helpers’ are aiding him in his ultimate goal of ruling the Earth in place of God The Creator.
1 Kings 5 (KJV)
1 And Hiram king of Tyre sent his servants unto Solomon; for he had heard that they had anointed him king in the room of his father: for Hiram was ever a lover of David.
We too can have all the power, control and wealth we desire – if that’s your ‘bag’, but the ultimately the price is our soul……
Hi All.
O the deception is great. Old Queeni has more power than you would wish to see. Blair attends the sacrificial rituals with the Queen, you are correct she is not the chief that belongs to Philip who stands as the most pure of the Aaenus-Charlemagne bloodline, he is the chief of the gens. You have to fully understand the occult hierarchy to see the power. It was the Queen Mother until her passing into the body of Prince Edward’s daughter. remember as she was dying the child as it was born was removed from its mother for 20 days. According to Christine Fitzgerald who was a close confidant of Diana, they have the secret of the micro currents which would explain why the Queen mother claimed she was Queen Victoria and before that Catherine de Medici. Man is so ignorant of the occult man is dumb in comparison.
I have a full detailed account of Diana and her death which I released some years ago, I may place it on site for you to see. if you go to the New World Order page on my site and scroll down to the bottom and click the link to Arizona Wilder, you will get a better picture of the occult world of these sick sick creatures….
Man hasd only half the reality available to him, the rest has been removed systematicaly since the deluge, Christianity has been the vehicle for the removal of all the occult knowledge, why do yoiu think they burnt the library at Alexandria, why do yoiu think they had to kill the native American’s and kill the African shaman’s? So they coukd keep the real truth of this world away from man to give them the ability to rule. The same with the Kinhg James Bible, he gave instruction on how to kill all women who communicate with the earth by labelling them witches. It is good that people now wish to grasp the conspiracy, but still you all concern yourselves only with that you can understand with the five senses… To fully grasp reality you have not even touched on the beginning, nor I feel will you be able to move into the world of the sixth sense, you have been conditioned to NOT SEE, TO NOT FEEL. I am sorry but this is the situation, and the reason Christianity has systematicxaly killed all those who can see and can hear the knowledge of the earth spirit…We are cast out as demons for communicating with the earth, only the sky god is allowed in the mix…. There version of the sky god. The Holy spirit is the bringer of the truth, she is the all encompassing female energy who carries you across the bridge into the heart, cast aside by religion keeping man fixed within the root Chakra, the sacral Chakra and the Solar Plexus, all three make up the kingdom of the evil one beneath the heart….
I am sick of hearing about how “wonderful,” how “lovely,” Baroness Jay is!
This woman is actually a PHONEY. She is a disgusting hypocrite of the highest order. She is part of the political dynasty – political class – that are ruining this country. They masquerade as ordinary when they are totally the opposite. They are over -privileged and represent only their own interests and those of their upper class cronies. The real and only reason she has progressed through politics, and become titled, is due to being the daughter of Jim Callaghan PM. She was educated at a posh girl’s school and has much less in common with ordinary people than women like Margaret Thatcher or Edwina Currie.
She gleefully oversaw the removal from power of the hereditary peers a few years ago for New Labour – yet failed to see, or chose to ignore, the irony of the fact that she is in a position of power herself entirely through nepotism, snobbish connections and privilege, not her own worth or effort. In effect, SHE IS A HEREDITARY PEER HERSELF! An arrogant, loathsome piece of work, like many in politics in Britain.
It really is quite amazing, when one takes the trouble to investigate, just how many people in all parties are very well connected and come from elite ruling dynasties that go back many generations. Particularly the Labour Party – the worker’s party? Which seems to have been totally high-jacked by unhinged toffs.
All
When I interviewed Stirling I found him to be a decent, honourable and honest man – qualities that are clearly lacking in the New Labour “ethical” government.
We all have our views and disagreements about the “institution” of the monarchy in this country, but at the end of the day, the hereditary peerage system has stood us in good stead for centuries as a bullwark against the kind of revolutionary “change” that this gang of communists is trying to ram down all our throats in the final death throes of Great Brtiain as a sovereign nation.
We must put aside our petty personal beliefs and antipathies towards the “ruling class” and think about the bigger picture from a constitutional perspective. If we seriously want to maintain peace and stability in the UK, we must work with the institutions we have been handed by our forebears and reform them to ensure that the justice we seek is delivered.
As such, I harbour no antipathy to the Queen herself, but the structure and governance of these Islands as a “state within a state” that has always oppressed the British people and those of other nations for the sake of the “interests” of the Club of the Isles and the City of London.
Remove the monarchy, and there is no barrier to an outright dictatorship in this country. We would do well to think about that carefully.
CAPITALIST TERRORISM: sequel to — CABAL’S NEW STRATEGIES SEQUEL: http://www.hermes-press.com/capitalist_terrorism.htm
“… Cabal capitalists have pulled off a second 9/11 terrorist attack–a financial assault on the world economy! A repeat of the 1929 economic crash.”
AND THIS IS A MUST REPORT TO SHARE WITH THE WHOLE WIDE OPENED EYED:
OBAMA’S SVENGALI
Rahm Emanuel likes to brag about his role in discovering Barack Obama. “Six years ago, people on the North Side of Chicago took a bet on a young kid,” reporter D.H. Williams writes of their symbiotic relationship.
“Rahm and Barack have a deep history together in Chicago politics. Emanuel has been instrumental in the rise of Barack Obama from neophyte senator to the next president of the United States. Getting virtually no media attention, Rahm Emanuel has been by Obama’s side during most of the last two years on the campaign trail.”
If Karl Rove was George W. Bush’s architect, the same can be said of the Emanuel connection. When Obama bowed and groveled at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) convention on June 4, 2008, it was Emanuel who escorted him to meet the executive board afterward.
http://www.americanfreepress.net/html/rahm_emanuel_157.html
Too true John – I have never met anyone here in the UK who is both pro-British AND anti-monarchist – (the Americans are different, but that is a different context – they can be both patriotic and anti monarchist.)
From the Bruges Group: website:
‘HOW MUCH DOES THE EUROPEAN UNION COST BRITAINS? 2008
The price of the combined direct and indirect expenses of EU membership in 2008 costs Britain £55.775 billion. Set out in the latest Bruges Group research the full financial burden to Britain has now been calculated. They show a dramatic increase in the costs of the EU – A price Britain cannot afford.
The facts:
- By 2007 Britain had an accumulated trade deficit with the other EU member states of £383.7 billion
- The Common Agricultural Policy costs Britain at least £16.8 billion per annum
- The Common Fisheries Policy costs Britain at least £3.275 billion per annum
- Over-regulation on business costs Britain at least £28 billion per annum’
The next time anybody spouts the anti-monarchist line and use their number one argument – the cost – ask them first if they support Britain’s membership of the EU ( I promise you that 99 times out of 100 that they will) – then hit ‘em with the Stats.
Stalin’s Soviet, Mao’s China – in terms of sheer scale all the biggest genocidal regimes are those that have deposed the monarchy.
Hi All.
It was the Inner City that deposed all the monarchies.
I want an American style constitution, a constitution that will free the people as the US constitution freed the American’s. We would just have to ensure this nation never succumbed to the private bankers of which the House of Windsor is a fully paid up member..
The problem as I see it is that the people believe they have no power, if the world
agreed to roll back the econimies figures to the time before the crash, issue bonds to those amounts, then each nation print their own interst free notes to those amounts,
we would in one foul swoop destroy by sidelining the private bankers currency, But of course people are way to clever to think of such an easy way out of this. It has always to be too complex, it supports their own intellectual idea of their own sense of self.
Hanging on to the death to the very system that is destroying this country is going to change nothing…
PS.
I would add that to keep the old system, we would have to reinstitute the old Christian laws on Usury, then take it from there. Move back to the English system pre Cromwell and the evil he rought upon us.
Hi All.
Gold & Silver manipulation coming to and end?
could the suppression of precious metals finally be over? although yours truly is a avid fan of bob chapman’s theinternationalforcaster.com i have heard this scenario before. granted the short interest in gold is the lowest it has been in while however this doesn’t mean a guaranteed run up in the price of gold. lets not forget we are dealing with a fiat system, a funny money system with temporary unlimited printing capabilities. We are very close to a total financial collapse where the suppression in gold and silver will end. until we hit this point the shorts will come in again. remember a low short interest means more buying power to manufacture another false ceiling or resistance level. -st0ckman
-just a snip of larger article:
Since the end of October, when open interest for the December gold contract started a new series of decreases as the rollovers got off to any early start, the December open interest has fallen from 190,140 to this past Friday’s 122,902, yet total open interest has fallen from 305,451 to 285,219 during that same period.
Thus, of the 67,238 December contracts that have been terminated in the rollover thus far, total open interest has plummeted by 20,232 contracts, meaning that many of the contracts are not being rolled over, and are being cashed out instead. If this 30% ratio persists, we could see gold open interest fall to under 250,000, a multi-year low, an astonishing drop of 58% from the peak of 593,953 contracts set on January 15, 2008.
This is an absolute disgrace for the CRIMEX owners and regulators, and we wish them well in the ensuing bankruptcies and criminal investigations that will occur after the exchange collapses. No one wants to play in a game where the owners and sponsors are in cahoots with certain privileged players to make sure they come out on top. In addition, we note that no commodities market can survive without speculators who provide balance to the markets by taking the other side of contracts and by keeping the pendulum of market momentum alternating between bulls and bears. Otherwise the markets lean to far to one side or the other, and then bubble and/or collapse due to the lopsided positions. Once the precious metals markets of the exchange collapse, all the other markets will soon follow, as everyone realizes that the whole system is rigged against them. The CRIMEX will soon be ostracized from participation by honest market players. The criminal manipulators will soon find themselves traipsing in and out of court in endless investigations, and they will be forced to sit in their bedrooms, lonesome, because their is no one left who wants to play with them.
If you found this article interesting please subscribe for updates with any reader or your email. This site is not monetized and 100 percent free. My only form of payment is my readers comments and subscriptions. Also be sure to check out my stock market crash warning pt2, updated 11-19-08. You can also support the st0ckman by joining the pyrabang network. PyraBang is an awesome concept striving to take down main stream media and their corporate programming.
One thing though-It’s not possible to buy a hereditary peer. That’s because they already have their castle and whatever, and so they tend to focus on more important things like the state. An MP’s salary though makes it quite cheap to buy ministers and even a prime minister. Just offer them some after dinner speaking jobs. The Chinese paid £1/2 million to hear Blair rabbit on for an hour or two. Think about it. Those Chinese do not pay that much money just for a speech.
A “spokeman” for the Treasury, defending the EU, states that 3 million jobs depend on us being in the EU!! Lies from civil servants should be a crime !
If we have a deficit with the EU of some £383 BILLION then please show us where these jobs are. This is just another mantra for the “dead on deck” brigade.
If every department of the Civil Service has an EU propagandist and 80% of our laws emanate from the EU and WE pay for all the EU propaganda, we are paying for our own demise !
The Queen has no power. Even Gordon Brown is merely a hireling. Call Me Dave and Legover Clegg are just a sideshow. We need to know the next few chapters…. !
Hi All.
I think I need to clarify something here. The Queen is NOT THE CROWN. She is the crowned head of state, the State is the Inner City belonging to the Roman system.
The Crown is a system, the Queen is a part of the system. When I speak of the Crown I am speaking in terms of a system.
As the head of state the Queen is duty bound to protect the British constitution, she has not served her Coronation Oath, she is acting treason against the English constitution as are this government and those preceding this one back to Edward Heath. I have no problem with the idea of our constitution, nor do I hold a negative aim against the aristocracy, we need people at this level to operate our system. What is pretty damn obvious is the fact that our whole system has been destroyed or we would not be in the mess we are… with massive immigration, then all the power of the state giving legal protection to the immigrants over and above the British people. We have to face the reality that all those holding power in our system are not fit for the role assigned to them, they have allowed this, they are responsible for it.
Therefore the system we have has failed to uphold the constitution, it has failed on every level. I would give my full support to any Lord or Earl or whatever if they stood once again for what made Britain a great nation to live and grow within.
Apparently JFK wanted shot of the FED. He saw them for what they were, and set about creating the United States Note which was to be supported by gold and silver. Some of these notes were printed and ready for use, but, alas, we all know what happened to JFK.
Wiggins.
This is what Andrew jackson accomplished and suffered seven assassination attempts, Abraham Lincoln did the same printing greenbacks and was assassinated.
In today’s climate what needs to be done is the world governments agree to set each global economy to a figure each nation requires, then isse bonds to each nation to the agreed amounts. Each nation’s government can then print its own interest free money to the bond balance. Therefore sidelining the private bankers and their fiat money. It matters not what is actual collatoral just as long as the whole globe agrees that these bonds are valid. It is no use claiming we need gold because the private bankers have it all and we know not were. It is so simple I am afraid those super intelligent minds will never go for it.
Guy Reid Brown –
– I have never met anyone here in the UK who is both pro-British AND anti-monarchist7
you have never met me then Guy.
the notion of people singing along with the national anthem in servitude
makes me feel ill however I do feel very pro-Brit.
I see them just as another tool with which to indoctrinate the masses
Have to admit to having no great love of the Monarchy. But I do consider myself to be pro-British and wish the very best for our country. The simple problem, as I see it , is that for far to many years we have been badly led by those at the top..that is where the problem lies. That said, I have no wish to see the Khazars and their supporters who have always wanted the destruction of the Monarchy in every country they have “invaded ” get their way.
Oddly however it could just be that our Monachy only exists in its form with the exsistance and help of the Rothchilds. I’m just not sure!
All
Suggest all watch the following as this lays out the nature of the conflict and solutions:
http://larouchepac.com/news/2008/11/21/lpactv-larouchepac-weekly-report-november-21-2008.html
I believe that we NEED a Monarchy in this country. The Alternative is too awful to contemplate. Just fancy a Republic with Gordon Brown as President. It makes your eyes water at the thought !!
Sadly, The Queen is powerless and is NOT allowed to voice her opinions (at least not in public). We really need someone in or near the Palace who can eavesdrop and do a “whistleblower” job, although, upon reflection, this might well rebound on Her Majesty of course.
The trouble is that if The Queen were to “come out” and speak against The Illuminati, this would, without doubt, rock the Throne, at the very least.
She is between a rock and a hard place !
Tom, if only she would speak out. But is she or is she not part of the Illuminati herself? Thats what I can’t decide. Does not matter what system you have, if you have a Rogue ( Puppet) at the head of it, it’s still going to be no dam good for the people of the country.
Hi All.
The Queen is the benefactor of the most horrendous insider trading. To think she has no power is to suck into the propoganda. This is how they succede in all they do, you are a million miles, behind hanging onto the very people who are destroying this nation.
The Queen is ‘IN’ she cares not one jot for any of you out there. You really need to get to grips with Freemasonry, what it is and who it serves…
Peter1945
Agree with the sentiments but not your analysis.
The REAL problem in this country is NOT the establishment, it is US, the people. We have lost all sense of civic pride, duty, responsibility and the will to fight the system and make change.
Too many people have sold their souls to the “prosperity” society, and forgotten the principles on which our democracy stands, and that is the real cause of our troubles, for if we stood up and resisted in sufficient numbers, nothing the ruling classes tried to do would succeed due to the massive resistance.
Without the police and/or the army on board I fear the populace is powerless UNLESS the majority took some kind of stand.
One really has to look at history to see how events can lead to “extinction of the old and installing of the new”.
Harold Wilson once said that 7 days in politics is a long time. Harold MacMillan said that when things “happened” it was “Events, dear boy, events “.
I fear that until a huge minority or a small majority wake up we must simply “wait and see”. Or is that too negative ?
Hi All.
When you know you can change things… you can and you do.
It is all a matter of how you see yourself, it comes from within and not from without. The global matrix is the lie, so if you take all your stimuli from outside of yourself , then it is all deception. Trust what comes from the heart, and don’t let your head destroy a good idea, the mind is the magician tricked by fear…
How many times have you had the greatest of insights only for your mind to rip it to pieces and the idea becpmes lost?
LIFE says:
The Queen is ‘IN’ she cares not one jot for any of you out there. You really need to get to grips with Freemasonry, what it is and who it serves…’
However, Prince Charles has refused to become a Mason – and looking at everything he has done with his life [the Princes Trust and the many similar organisations he has founded that has given practical help to thousands, plus the genuinely visionary stances on Architecture, Organic and sustainable farming and the practical hard work he has put into that – and without ever exploiting it for PR purposes (look at how the ‘Princess of Hearts’ was able to turn the mob against him) – well, unless he has put an EXTRAORDINARY amount of calculation into all this, I think he is the Real Thing.
Nothing worthwhile has ever been achieved in History without a figurehead (the great periods of British History are associated with figureheads – Victorian, Elizabethan.)
Of course, this new ghastly phase of national demise can similarly be appended to a figurehead – will this be in future years be known as the New Elizabethan era?
Let us work for the new Carolingian Restoration.
Tom said: “I fear that until a huge minority or a small majority wake up we must simply “wait and see”. Or is that too negative ?”
The answer is: yes, and no.
I believe that those who can already see what is going on have one responsibility at this time: keep talking, keep ACTING. No matter how much everyone else is asking you to just shut up, or stop what you’re doing, keep at it instead.
At some point, national and world events are going to get too much for even the (at present) sleeping majority. When they do waken up, they are going to get very angry, very quickly. When that happens, they are likely to become violent. That’s the worst thing they can do – it gives governments the excuse they need to take drastic action, which will result in a whole lot of pain.
So we need to keep talking and doing whatever we can. If we all do that, when people start to waken, they’re already primed for the right answers. The soon-to-be waking majority has to respond peacefully. Simple, peaceful, non-cooperation. Those that would oppress have no answer for that. Never have had.
Hi All.
Wow you guys have run back into your shell.
Guy go and study the Merovingians Page on my site, it is the Carolingian’s who usurped the Merovingian’s, it is the Carolingian’s who are the venetians-Imperial bloodlines.
Editor, sit and wait for your demise if you wish, but we are under attack from the very people you hold in high regard.
Tell me gentlemen, at what point in history have the rich come to save the poor?
You are defunct as means of rebellion…BONNIE PRINCE CHARLIES the lot of you.
Sorry; but cruel to be kind…
John I think your meet with Lord Stirling has shifted your frequencies….
Hi All, While you are down…
Larouch is only playing with half the tuth, he is not inspired, he is trying to make the best sense of known history, which of course has been written by the venetian-imperial bloodlines…
I see no means to success while you all have this mindset, you need to allow those who understand the secret world to educate you…
I smell Freemasonry at work here
looks like labour are getting in for a 4th term with this tax cuts pledge,
John Morton.
I can’t disagree with any of that,and you are right that people have sold their souls to “prosperity” society etc.
BUT who encouraged this type of society in the first place? Would suggest it has been the Consevatives and Labour governments over the last thirty years or so.. Helped also by the Press and TV.
The intentional dumbing down of this country, I don’t believe started with the ordinary man in the street (although he should have perhaps worked out what was going on) it orginated from those at the top.
Like it or not I don’t think you will change peoples attitudes and outlook until some honisty, Integrity and responsibility is shown from the top. What’s the point of having a “Establishment” if it does not lead by example?
I accept however in an ideal world individuals should show responsibility for how they act and behave inspite of what the “Establishment” gets up to.
Life:
You are wrong.
I say that emphatically, because I know LaRouche personally. So does John Morton. I was at his 85th birthday party in Kiedrich last year, and I can tell you it was one of the most inspired events I have ever been to in my life. John and I shared dinner with him in Berlin the year before, and again, it was inspirational. Every other time I have met the man, I came away feeling that if I am even a hundredth of the man he is when I am 86 years old …
LaRouche is doing what he knows to be right. If that doesn’t fit with your world view, then that’s fine. But you will NEVER find him working for those that you consider the enemy, and to suggest otherwise is just nonsense.
Hello Mr Life
When I was talking about a CarolingiAn Reformation, I was not referring to some Frankish bloodline or whatever – I was referring to the Charles the Second Restoration period in England, and of course the Prince of Wales would be Charles the Third.
Hi All.
Let me make it clear sir’s.
It was prince Charles who was to become my mentor at the end of my term in the mystery school. Sir’s I can still rememvber wht it felt like as they plugged me into their vibration.
Whe it comes to the Royal family you only know them defined by protocol, you have no concept of their real persona. You are fooled by protocol only.
John, Editor, then as you know laRouche, I know the frequencies around the real Prince Charles..
We seemed to have drifted away from the name of this article, “Cash for Honours”.
We have the self-seeking Lords, Kinnock, Mandelson, Malloch-Brown, Heseltine, and all the other “grab-it-while-you-can” brigade”
Then we have those that have paid for their peerages, knighthoods etc.
Kinnock mustn’t criticise the EU in any way, or he loses his EU pension !
It won’t be long for Lord Prescott of Hull and a few more when Labour get kicked out. Then Call MeDave and his lot move in and we start all over again !
It’s not so much the “Cash for Honours” that worries me, so much as the “Cash for FAVOURS.” That’s where we have the REAL corruption.
Life et al
If you knew me better, you would never accuse me of altering my vibrations. I have been through and suffered more than enough for my beliefs, which certainly are not pro-monarchist by any stretch of the imagination.
We must put aside the conflation of the “monarchy” (first person participal) with monarchism, which is an embedded institution in this country that nothing short of bloody revolution and civil war will uproot.
I swear this to you as a Republican, a sympathizer of the American Revolution and as one who would wish nothing more than to see this nation follow the same lead.
In these matters however, and at this time of GRAVE, EXISTENTIAL CRISIS for this nation, and civilization, we must stop thinking emotionally and taking grand sweeping idealistic positions on matters which we cannot and will never change about this Island of ours.
Life, whereas you are clearly dedicated to the eradication of the royal bloodlines and all that they represent, I am dedicated to the cause of peace, security and stability of this country and hence the general welfare of our people. I would walk a mile on burning coals to save this country from what is now coming down on us all, and if I must compromise to achieve the salvation of England, I will do so in a heartbeat, irrespective of the retchings in my gut and my soul that such a compromise will unleash.
I am surprised that John Morton dislikes the monarchy so much, and would very much prefer Great Britain to become a republic.
Who shall we nominate for president ? Gordon Brown ? Call Me Dave, That Clegg man ?
Or perhaps one of the runners-up, Peter Mandelson, Ed Balls, Alistair Darling. ? Take your pick !
No, whilst we have a monarchy, we can’t have a dictatorship !
First THEY must get rid of The Queen ! Not an easy job, but it could be done, by foreigners of course, directly from Brussels, which would have to be rubber stamped by our PARLIAMENT. The Queen is already a citizen of the EU, as stated by John Major.
Jean Monnet has brought us this far down the road to oblivion. No one really seems to care, apart from “the few”.
They say that the pen is mightier than the sword. It is up to us to prove it.
Hi All.
Its good to let out those brewing feelings on occasion. it refreshes the debate and every one gets a better understanding of each other…No offence meant in any respects to all…
Tom
Please re-read what I said and think carefully.
What I am saying is that we need to reform the monarchy to better serve the interests of this country and to immediately revoke their plans for world genocide as promoted by both that Nazi Philip and his son Charles.
To the extent that the sitting Monarch of England/Great Britain follows their constitutional oaths and serves US, the people, then I have no issue with them.
Sadly, this monarch, her husband and progeny have betrayed us, upto and including the signing of the UNCONSTITUTIONAL Lisbon treaty, and so I am calling for them to abdicate and be replaced by a Monarchy who does and will serve our nation faithfully.
Hi All.
Ok John, I hear you, but you are talking as if you have someone in mind to take the place of this royal family, the same idea I recieved from John Harris. He said the person they have in mind would never allow this madness to happen. John Harris also said to me that the Templars were not bad, that they were mis-understood.
If you guys have someone in mind then share this information, otherwise you are seen to be leading the people into a false sense of security only for you to announce yet another lame duck and puppet.
You suggest “if I knew you”, John… The whole aim of the spiritual journey is to know thyself.
When one truly understands oneself then you also know every other human and animal on the planet, we are made up of the same .
Hitlers closest aid stated that Hitler was medium, as most of the time he was as normal as any man, only when required was he imbued with such an energy, that is seemed he was ultra powerful. Hitler had the means to shift peoples frequencies as they came into his aura, this is what I experienced with myself as they plugged me in during the late 1990’s. The medium acts as a conduit for the energy, it matters not whether the energy is negative or positive, the same attraction is operating which thus shifts all auric fields that come into contact with the medium. Of course in Hitler’s case we would call this a, ‘fat6al attraction’, but attraction it was none the less. Do you think the majority of people who came into contact with Hitler thought he was evil? No is the answer, but they took on the shift all the same. The Nuremberg rallies were great occult rituals to amplify the energy coming through Hitler to encompass all at the rallies. Unless one has accomplished certain spiritual attainments, then this energy shifts all who come into contact with the energies. The DNA is nothing other than a reciever and transmitter of light (energy), this is the very feeling you named as “INSPIRED”.
The means to which the same bloodlines have controlled the world since the deluge is down to the fact that what comes in the place of the force the people are revolting against…Is the same force with a different mask.
La Rouche holds FDR in high regard when FDR was a Freemason 33 Degree, he ws Illuminati, he took his thumbs up signiture from Alaister Crowley as Hitler took the Nazui salute (which was a Golden Dawn salute). and old Winnie Churchill took his V for Victory sign from Crowley also. FDR placed the pyramid with the missing capstone onto the Dollar bill, he also allowed in fact forced the Japanese to attack pearl harbour (see my 911 page video’s).
When I say LaRouche is not playing with the full and basic truth, it is on such issues as these that I base them. I do not doubt for a second your and indeed the Editor’s well meaning, we have spoken often and I hold you both in high regard, but in this game one has to fully check out those who we at times hold in high regard, for in most cases they are either duped puppets themselves or high occultist’s.
Lack of an occult understanding places all in a situation of entrapment without the mind ever suspecting it, and if the mind does, the shift of frequencies to resonate with the medium cancels it out..
I like Ron Paul, yet he refuses to answer the question , ‘Is he a Freemason, LaRouche again I like what he says…BUT…The elite use good people by occult means to ensure we all take up the new force on the block, once accomplished the good men are removed and the sick creature takes its place at the top of the newly formed movement and the game goes rouind and round again..
My advice would be for the both of you to re-analyse those you hold in high regard and look at their contridictions, then use your own anylytical mind to make the required adjustments.
I, like all men would like to find a leader, but as yet all who place themselves up as such have major floors, floors that will achieve nothing we all want in the long run…
With respect and friendship Life…
To John Morton.
I don’t mind being told when I’m wrong but did you not say that (a) you are a Republican and (b) that you are an anti-monarchist ?
If you are one, or both, of these, then you MUST be prepared to accept a PRESIDENT. !
I have previously outlined some contenders for that job !
Tom
In an ideal world yes, I would like to see the concept of hereditary monarchy replaced entirely with a meritocratic society based on a government of principles, not of priviledge.
However, I am pragmatic enough to know that this is never going to happen in the UK, and so the best we can hope for is a reformation under a new monarchy that is prepared to accept their role and coronation oath to the BRITISH PEOPLE, to serve us and our nation faithfully.
This country will never be a Republic, because our culture has been so degraded and demolished to have had the very idea of Republican humanism uprooted from us since the Venetian invasion and imposition of the House of Orange Anglo-Dutch rentier financier tyranny over these Islands.
We musy rely on our distant cousins in America to lead us out of the darkness that we, in our failure to follow their example, have brought upon ourselves.
Life
The financial oligarchy has declared LaRouche and his organization(s) as their #1 enemy since his resouding defeat of economist Abba Lerner in 1970s.
I find your research interesting, but I do not and cannot agree with you that, for example, FDR was “illuminati”.
This simply makes no sense whatsoever for a man who spent his life fighting Nazi tyranny, so I would urge you to review your research and think about where some of this information might be coming from.
HINT: It seems to me that you have succumbed to disinformation and fallen into a populist trap that has been laid for you by those who wish to control the future by controlling the past.