<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Magna Carta &#8211; Practising Solicitor Urgently Wanted</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ukcolumn.org/2008/04/21/magna-carta-practising-solicitor-urgently-wanted/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ukcolumn.org/2008/04/21/magna-carta-practising-solicitor-urgently-wanted/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: david_grothier</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>david_grothier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Aug 2008 19:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=100#comment-251</guid>
		<description>The Magna Carta Man, Mr John Harris has done so much for us all in pointing the way forward and possibly---- depending upon our resolve to listen to what he is saying. 

John Harris can guide Britain back on track, for all our benefits, as a free democratic country run on behalf of the people, for the benefit of the people-----
This can be achieve if we all recognises John Harris as a good man and a potential leader. I am fully committed to follow him, and to support his progressive work. 

His time he freely gives to those who seek his help and wisdom and that quality already puts him streets ahead of any of our current bunch of MPs.

Although John and I have disagreed on a number of issues, basically we are on the same road and I have no doubt that the junction of total unity is not that far ahead of us both.

John Harris, to me nowadays is The Manâ€“------The Magna Carta Man for all future seasons,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Magna Carta Man, Mr John Harris has done so much for us all in pointing the way forward and possibly&#8212;- depending upon our resolve to listen to what he is saying. </p>
<p>John Harris can guide Britain back on track, for all our benefits, as a free democratic country run on behalf of the people, for the benefit of the people&#8212;&#8211;<br />
This can be achieve if we all recognises John Harris as a good man and a potential leader. I am fully committed to follow him, and to support his progressive work. </p>
<p>His time he freely gives to those who seek his help and wisdom and that quality already puts him streets ahead of any of our current bunch of MPs.</p>
<p>Although John and I have disagreed on a number of issues, basically we are on the same road and I have no doubt that the junction of total unity is not that far ahead of us both.</p>
<p>John Harris, to me nowadays is The Manâ€“&#8212;&#8212;The Magna Carta Man for all future seasons,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david_grothier</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>david_grothier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Aug 2008 09:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=100#comment-246</guid>
		<description>mMmhh very well put, and you could be right! 

This indeed may may be our saviour, our God&#039;s sent newspaper.

Problem is in getting the majority of the great British public awy from footie and page three to read it.

Talking about reading-----Any thoughts on the launch issue of the new magazine - Standpoint - re: an article by &quot;The Mole&quot; see here 

http://www.standpointmag.co.uk/the-mole-june

claimed to be written by &quot;a military officer who has worked for several years in the MOD&quot; referred to &quot;broadly a 1 to 4 ratio of civilian to military personnel&quot; ... now being &quot;6 to 1&quot;



Sometimes these issues as so misleading pathetic, I donâ€™t know if I should laugh, cry or be bothered at all.

Given that the majority of our ci--vile servants have already been conditioned (I would use refrain from using brainwashed, as that implies a brain) into propounding the virtues of the beast of Brussel&#039;s new breed of Nazism in the form of Common Purpose, I wonder why, especially since the intention of this government, and the treacherous queen( ever looking after her own interests, is to quietly fade away, under the assumed safety of the EU umbrealla!...These intentions were clearly made so blatantly and undemocratically obvious when Daisy Brown opened the back to and signed the EU Treaty.

Therefore, the question has to be that if we are signing away Britain to Europe, and we are all to live under the slug like conditions of Common Purpose, what&#039;s the point of our armed forces as surely they will be the---- European Military and dangerously under the control of none elected leaders in Brussels...Kinda like back in the USSR folks.

Which is a strange analogy when considering some of the ideologies doing the rounds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mMmhh very well put, and you could be right! </p>
<p>This indeed may may be our saviour, our God&#8217;s sent newspaper.</p>
<p>Problem is in getting the majority of the great British public awy from footie and page three to read it.</p>
<p>Talking about reading&#8212;&#8211;Any thoughts on the launch issue of the new magazine &#8211; Standpoint &#8211; re: an article by &#8220;The Mole&#8221; see here </p>
<p><a href="http://www.standpointmag.co.uk/the-mole-june" rel="nofollow">http://www.standpointmag.co.uk/the-mole-june</a></p>
<p>claimed to be written by &#8220;a military officer who has worked for several years in the MOD&#8221; referred to &#8220;broadly a 1 to 4 ratio of civilian to military personnel&#8221; &#8230; now being &#8220;6 to 1&#8243;</p>
<p>Sometimes these issues as so misleading pathetic, I donâ€™t know if I should laugh, cry or be bothered at all.</p>
<p>Given that the majority of our ci&#8211;vile servants have already been conditioned (I would use refrain from using brainwashed, as that implies a brain) into propounding the virtues of the beast of Brussel&#8217;s new breed of Nazism in the form of Common Purpose, I wonder why, especially since the intention of this government, and the treacherous queen( ever looking after her own interests, is to quietly fade away, under the assumed safety of the EU umbrealla!&#8230;These intentions were clearly made so blatantly and undemocratically obvious when Daisy Brown opened the back to and signed the EU Treaty.</p>
<p>Therefore, the question has to be that if we are signing away Britain to Europe, and we are all to live under the slug like conditions of Common Purpose, what&#8217;s the point of our armed forces as surely they will be the&#8212;- European Military and dangerously under the control of none elected leaders in Brussels&#8230;Kinda like back in the USSR folks.</p>
<p>Which is a strange analogy when considering some of the ideologies doing the rounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PETER CAMPBELL</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>PETER CAMPBELL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=100#comment-245</guid>
		<description>as the  eu satanic spiritual  powers  try to invade  our very souls through  there ducking and weaving of there deceit and lies , david millaband  the  top minister in gordon browns  office eager  to take over this power ?  and  take  his place in the belly of this  beast ..called the eu? but our mantle  of truth ,called the uk column will prevail ,  as  brian girrish the edtor  and staff  burn the mid-night oil  to get  this gods send of  a news paper  out to  the british public  , come next years  eu elections  , we can use our votes for my party  of the ukip ...as  a protest vote  on a referendumn ? god speed  www.uk column .com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as the  eu satanic spiritual  powers  try to invade  our very souls through  there ducking and weaving of there deceit and lies , david millaband  the  top minister in gordon browns  office eager  to take over this power ?  and  take  his place in the belly of this  beast ..called the eu? but our mantle  of truth ,called the uk column will prevail ,  as  brian girrish the edtor  and staff  burn the mid-night oil  to get  this gods send of  a news paper  out to  the british public  , come next years  eu elections  , we can use our votes for my party  of the ukip &#8230;as  a protest vote  on a referendumn ? god speed  <a href="http://www.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.uk</a> column .com</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david_grothier</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>david_grothier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 11:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=100#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Many people throughout this nation have openly decided that when daisy Brown signed the EU Treaty the sneaky way he committed an Act of Treason. I firmly and honestly support this view as I am only to well aware of the contend of the Lisbon Treaty, and further fully aware that most of the Rank and File in Britain today are not as well verse with these matters, as for example our Irish neighbours areâ€“-they in turn given their rightful referendum were wise enough to vote a resounding no. In fact of those polled on the Lisbon Treaty, many who had received their copy of the same found, it too difficult to understand! As indeed do many MEPs

Under any democratic principle this Irish. â€œNoâ€ vote should have been respected by the Brussels bureaucratic bourgeoisie,

However, unsurprisingly it was not and immediately there were outrageously undemocratic cries the change the democratic Irish rejection, talks behind the scene are still being conducted. 

Why should this be if the Treaty of Lisbon is merely an EU reform to ensure a clear and easier form of EU Institution functions, or could it be rather more a case of tightening the strangle hold upon the Member States?

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=uXflgt7ZmOU&amp;feature=email

A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gate is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.
-- Cicero, 45 BC</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people throughout this nation have openly decided that when daisy Brown signed the EU Treaty the sneaky way he committed an Act of Treason. I firmly and honestly support this view as I am only to well aware of the contend of the Lisbon Treaty, and further fully aware that most of the Rank and File in Britain today are not as well verse with these matters, as for example our Irish neighbours areâ€“-they in turn given their rightful referendum were wise enough to vote a resounding no. In fact of those polled on the Lisbon Treaty, many who had received their copy of the same found, it too difficult to understand! As indeed do many MEPs</p>
<p>Under any democratic principle this Irish. â€œNoâ€ vote should have been respected by the Brussels bureaucratic bourgeoisie,</p>
<p>However, unsurprisingly it was not and immediately there were outrageously undemocratic cries the change the democratic Irish rejection, talks behind the scene are still being conducted. </p>
<p>Why should this be if the Treaty of Lisbon is merely an EU reform to ensure a clear and easier form of EU Institution functions, or could it be rather more a case of tightening the strangle hold upon the Member States?</p>
<p><a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=uXflgt7ZmOU&amp;feature=email" rel="nofollow">http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=uXflgt7ZmOU&amp;feature=email</a></p>
<p>A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gate is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.<br />
&#8211; Cicero, 45 BC</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david_grothier</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>david_grothier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=100#comment-212</guid>
		<description>pretty serious stuff this--a must watch.



http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=uXflgt7ZmOU&amp;feature=email</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pretty serious stuff this&#8211;a must watch.</p>
<p><a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=uXflgt7ZmOU&amp;feature=email" rel="nofollow">http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=uXflgt7ZmOU&amp;feature=email</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david_grothier</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>david_grothier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 09:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=100#comment-211</guid>
		<description>We have this admirable quote on the front page---

&#039;A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gate is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.&#039;
-- Cicero, 45 BC

And its safe to assume that most of us here agree that Heath and the Queen took us into the EU under an act of treason.

The obvious question now is after 26 year of living in a country infested by traitorous politicians what are we going do do about resorting British sovereignty and get our sense of values back?

Sure we can talk about it dog legged fashioned for the next 26 years, meanwhile that does not stop the ever constant barrage of seemingly illegal EU legislation forced up this sceptered isle.

As Lord Denning stated--- the flow of EU legislation is as unstoppable as the tide.

Whatever happen to the great British will to stand firm?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have this admirable quote on the front page&#8212;</p>
<p>&#8216;A nation can survive its fools and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gate is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banners openly against the city. But the traitor moves among those within the gates freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in the accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to be feared.&#8217;<br />
&#8211; Cicero, 45 BC</p>
<p>And its safe to assume that most of us here agree that Heath and the Queen took us into the EU under an act of treason.</p>
<p>The obvious question now is after 26 year of living in a country infested by traitorous politicians what are we going do do about resorting British sovereignty and get our sense of values back?</p>
<p>Sure we can talk about it dog legged fashioned for the next 26 years, meanwhile that does not stop the ever constant barrage of seemingly illegal EU legislation forced up this sceptered isle.</p>
<p>As Lord Denning stated&#8212; the flow of EU legislation is as unstoppable as the tide.</p>
<p>Whatever happen to the great British will to stand firm?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david_grothier</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>david_grothier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:54:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=100#comment-134</guid>
		<description>I really donâ€™t think that the average person fully understands the absolute power of LIZ. Most say she is only a constitutional monarch with no power.

I wonder if those who claim that to be so actually know or even care to know, exactly who, and how many of them â€œtharrrrrrÂ· hangers on,  swear a personal oath of total allegiance to LIZ and not to the State etc.

So if Liz is just a figure head why does she need her sycophants?

If I were to tell you that Liz is the Grand Patreoness of World freemasonry, that should give you all a clue. If I went further and told you, that Liz is the only person that British secret service has to answer to.( check out  MI5â€™s logo..the all seeing eye! No less). And even further when I say the British secret service is supposed to be a part of the democratic government of the UK yet it is answerable only to a non elected personâ€“LIZ So much for the facade of British democracy! Now for those of you reading here who were commissioned in the military during Wilsonâ€™s time, it would be inconceivable, that you would not have had wind of the MI5 plot to remove him.

I donâ€™t want to harp on this topic as there are way too many conspiracy theories doing the rounds. Take a look here and think for yourselves. www.guba.com/watch/3000014882

0K, a bit scary yes but if true then the secret service under the control of LIZ worked to remove a democratically elect British Prime Minister.

Therefore people democracy does not exist in Britain as it and Britain are owned by the Establishment and the Establishment is owned by no less than LIZ. Try and find some stuff on , â€œ Le circle.â€


So as all good theories go Wilson went and then died. Thatcher was in and her remit from LIZ,  which she loved, was to destroy the power base of the BRITISH Working Classes.

Takes a lot of â€œtaking in,â€ does it not? And you may or may not agree with it all or in part, thatâ€™s for you to decide. However I am happy that LIZ is no friend of the people and should go as LIZ is for LIZ and her gang!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really donâ€™t think that the average person fully understands the absolute power of LIZ. Most say she is only a constitutional monarch with no power.</p>
<p>I wonder if those who claim that to be so actually know or even care to know, exactly who, and how many of them â€œtharrrrrrÂ· hangers on,  swear a personal oath of total allegiance to LIZ and not to the State etc.</p>
<p>So if Liz is just a figure head why does she need her sycophants?</p>
<p>If I were to tell you that Liz is the Grand Patreoness of World freemasonry, that should give you all a clue. If I went further and told you, that Liz is the only person that British secret service has to answer to.( check out  MI5â€™s logo..the all seeing eye! No less). And even further when I say the British secret service is supposed to be a part of the democratic government of the UK yet it is answerable only to a non elected personâ€“LIZ So much for the facade of British democracy! Now for those of you reading here who were commissioned in the military during Wilsonâ€™s time, it would be inconceivable, that you would not have had wind of the MI5 plot to remove him.</p>
<p>I donâ€™t want to harp on this topic as there are way too many conspiracy theories doing the rounds. Take a look here and think for yourselves. <a href="http://www.guba.com/watch/3000014882" rel="nofollow">http://www.guba.com/watch/3000014882</a></p>
<p>0K, a bit scary yes but if true then the secret service under the control of LIZ worked to remove a democratically elect British Prime Minister.</p>
<p>Therefore people democracy does not exist in Britain as it and Britain are owned by the Establishment and the Establishment is owned by no less than LIZ. Try and find some stuff on , â€œ Le circle.â€</p>
<p>So as all good theories go Wilson went and then died. Thatcher was in and her remit from LIZ,  which she loved, was to destroy the power base of the BRITISH Working Classes.</p>
<p>Takes a lot of â€œtaking in,â€ does it not? And you may or may not agree with it all or in part, thatâ€™s for you to decide. However I am happy that LIZ is no friend of the people and should go as LIZ is for LIZ and her gang!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stopthepodulants</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>stopthepodulants</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=100#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know how the law would be changed - if it was all done above board? It seems Common Purpose has decided what rights we do and don&#039;t have under our own legal system. Yet it claims to be a charity? After all if an organisation can do that to our rights in law, it must be able to do pretty much anything. What procedures were followed? Please follow the link on the homepage of www.podulantpeople.co.uk and listen for yourself. regardless of whether we agree or disagree in the the segregation of society into different rights and classes, it seems more than freaky to me that the law can be rewritten by a &#039;Charity&#039; Where does that remit end.. if indeed it does?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know how the law would be changed &#8211; if it was all done above board? It seems Common Purpose has decided what rights we do and don&#8217;t have under our own legal system. Yet it claims to be a charity? After all if an organisation can do that to our rights in law, it must be able to do pretty much anything. What procedures were followed? Please follow the link on the homepage of <a href="http://www.podulantpeople.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.podulantpeople.co.uk</a> and listen for yourself. regardless of whether we agree or disagree in the the segregation of society into different rights and classes, it seems more than freaky to me that the law can be rewritten by a &#8216;Charity&#8217; Where does that remit end.. if indeed it does?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Morton</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>John Morton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=100#comment-94</guid>
		<description>The crown is the sovereign.

In international law, the &quot;sovereign&quot; is the legal personality of the British nation and constitutional order under magna carta.

As such, the Queen herself has no power to abolish or transfer the sovereign power vested in her by her coronation to a foreign power - the EU.

By doing so, she herself will have committed treason, which is why you find our &quot;Attorney General&quot; talking about altering or abolishing our treason laws in recent weeks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The crown is the sovereign.</p>
<p>In international law, the &#8220;sovereign&#8221; is the legal personality of the British nation and constitutional order under magna carta.</p>
<p>As such, the Queen herself has no power to abolish or transfer the sovereign power vested in her by her coronation to a foreign power &#8211; the EU.</p>
<p>By doing so, she herself will have committed treason, which is why you find our &#8220;Attorney General&#8221; talking about altering or abolishing our treason laws in recent weeks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foo</title>
		<link>http://forums.ukcolumn.org/showthread.php?tid=&#038;pid=#pid</link>
		<dc:creator>Foo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 09:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ukcolumn.org/?p=100#comment-90</guid>
		<description>One must ask the question...Solicitors&#039; sworn loyalty. Who have they sworn their loyalty to? Presumably it is to the &quot;Crown&quot;. But who really is the &quot;Crown&quot;? Is it the Queen or is it The City of London? or ....?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One must ask the question&#8230;Solicitors&#8217; sworn loyalty. Who have they sworn their loyalty to? Presumably it is to the &#8220;Crown&#8221;. But who really is the &#8220;Crown&#8221;? Is it the Queen or is it The City of London? or &#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
